Exodus: Gods and Kings

Name: Exodus: Gods and Kings
Genre: Action, Adventure, Drama
Released: December 12, 2014
Duration: 150 min
Rating: 52
Cast: Ben Kingsley, Ben Mendelsohn, Christian Bale, Joel Edgerton, Sigourney Weaver

2014

METASCORE

Mixed or average reviews based on 43 Critics

See All

USER SCORE

Mixed or average reviews based on 372 Ratings

See All

4.8

VOTE NOW

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

4.8	Your Score
4.8	User Score Mixed or average reviews based on 372 Ratings

Would you like to write a review?

There is a 75 character minimum for reviews. If your review contains spoilers, please check the Spoiler box. Please do not use ALL CAPS. There is no linking or other HTML allowed. Your review may be edited for content. 0/5000

Check box if your review contains spoilers

Please enter your birth date to watch this video:

You are not allowed to view this material at this time.

Exodus: Gods And Kings

Movie Details & Credits

Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation | Release Date: December 12, 2014

Starring: Ben Kingsley, Ben Mendelsohn, Christian Bale, Joel Edgerton, Sigourney Weaver

Summary: Moses (Christian Bale) rises up against the Egyptian Pharaoh Ramses (Joel Edgerton), setting 400,000 slaves on a monumental journey of escape from Egypt and its terrifying cycle of deadly plagues. [20th Century Fox]

Director: Ridley Scott

Genre(s): Action, Adventure, Drama

Rating: PG-13

Runtime: 150 min

See All Details and Credits

Awards & Rankings

39	#39 Most Discussed Movie of 2014
47	#47 Most Shared Movie of 2014

Watch Now

Buy On

Stream On

Metascore

Positive:

Mixed:

Negative:

Critic Reviews

100

Chicago Sun-Times - Richard Roeper

Dec 11, 2014

As a fictional, big-budget, 3-D, epic interpretation of Moses’ journey, Exodus: Gods and Kings is spectacular. Read full review

Entertainment Weekly - Chris Nashawaty

Dec 10, 2014

Is it possible to sit through a movie, mentally cataloging its absurdities, and still walk out dazzled? Because that pretty much sums up my experience watching Ridley Scott's eye-candy spectacle Exodus: Gods and Kings, an over-the-top Old Testament epic that's essentially Gladiator with God. Read full review

Chicago Tribune - Michael Phillips

Dec 11, 2014

How you respond to the totality of Exodus: Gods and Kings will, I suspect, relate directly to how you responded to Ridley Scott's "Robin Hood" from 2010. Square, a little heavy on its feet, much of that film held me, even when its bigness trumped its goodness. Same with this one. Read full review

USA Today - Claudia Puig

Dec 11, 2014

Swarms of flies, oozing pustules, alligator attacks and gaggles of frogs are vividly rendered in three dimensions in Exodus: Gods and Kings. And yet this biblical epic is still bland, overly long and otherwise forgettable. Read full review

Philadelphia Inquirer - Steven Rea

Dec 12, 2014

As for Bale, he seems to have lost his compass. His accent strays, his famous intensity wasted on clunky dialogue. Read full review

TheWrap - Alonso Duralde

Nov 29, 2014

This stodgy adaptation creaks with solemnity — not to mention reactionary casting choices — and apart from some nifty frog and locust infestations, even the special effects pale next to a wind-blown Charlton Heston parting the Red Sea. Read full review

New York Daily News - Joe Neumaier

Dec 10, 2014

This eye-rollingly bad movie is silly, sluggish and miscast. Read full review

SEE ALL 43 REVIEWS

Write a Review

User Reviews

SchroederRock

Dec 12, 2014

Usually I give fair reviews, but since people are tanking the scores because it doesn't follow a Biblical story properly, I'm giving it a 10. As a Christian, I want to spite all the other Christians that forget that Hollywood is Hollywood, and that Ridley Scott only does epic death and notUsually I give fair reviews, but since people are tanking the scores because it doesn't follow a Biblical story properly, I'm giving it a 10. As a Christian, I want to spite all the other Christians that forget that Hollywood is Hollywood, and that Ridley Scott only does epic death and not much else. The only surprise here is that Russell Crowe wasn't tapped for the lead role. I'm rooting for this movie to tear it up this season, if for no other reason than to piss off the close-minded r-tards that can't take a joke and forbid a little dancing. Cheers!… Expand

22 of 45 users found this helpful2223

LeZee

Apr 3, 2015

This is a well known story and I have also seen the '56 movie 'The Ten Commandments'. So in this film could not foresee the modification, but it did in a slight manner like the later 'Noah' movie. The best part was the visuals, the graphics were so good, hard to resist the pleasure if youThis is a well known story and I have also seen the '56 movie 'The Ten Commandments'. So in this film could not foresee the modification, but it did in a slight manner like the later 'Noah' movie. The best part was the visuals, the graphics were so good, hard to resist the pleasure if you are vfx geek like me. That's the reason I love modern movie, especially remake of a classic like 'King Kong'. The problem in this flick was lie in the story telling.

As we know, Ridley Scott is an excellent narrator, but this movie was too short even though it ran 150 minutes. I felt it was just a brief, I mean there were no details or depth in the important scenes. You will know what I'm saying if you had watched '56 movie I mentioned in a above paragraph. That's drawback for the first timers at a same time advantage for not to fall in boredom for those who have already seen other versions. Christian Bale, awesome; Joel Edgerton, good; Ben Kingsley, never required; Aaron Paul, totally waste.

Overall, not cleverly stablised in the scenes that are very important, especially the final one about ten commandments should have been extended a little bit with a moral message. If it was a Peter Jackson movie, definitely it would have been a trilogy with an aggregated time of over 500 minutes. This movie was an entertainer like I enjoyed it than the message deliverer. Must be watched for the amusement and for the pleasure in updating technical aspect of the narration rather than inspiration.

7.5/10… Expand

1 of 5 users found this helpful14

epoc

Dec 12, 2014

Unlike many, I actually thought this movie was decent. At the time of this review the user review section was just littered with 1's and 2's, resulting in an incredibly low user score of 1.9! That's lower than the Star Wars prequels! Yeah that's messed up, and it's all probably butt hurtUnlike many, I actually thought this movie was decent. At the time of this review the user review section was just littered with 1's and 2's, resulting in an incredibly low user score of 1.9! That's lower than the Star Wars prequels! Yeah that's messed up, and it's all probably butt hurt Ridley Scott fan boys raging because of Prometheus. The first half of this film, for me was the best. We have these two very strong brother characters; Moses played by Christian Bale and Ramses played by Joel Edgerson. The brilliant aspect is that the two clearly have conflicting ideologies, yet still love and respect each other. It adds this additional tension to every scene the two share, as your constantly wondering if an argument will erupt, but you don't that to happen because the movie does such a good job of establishing their friendship. Helping this are great performances from both, fleshing them out and making them more believable. This especially the case for Moses, which is the best aspect of this film. He's this really good, wise man who you can really root for, yet isn't some paragon of virtue that will always do the right thing. For example, initially Moses doesn't want to unleash the plagues on Egypt, as he thinks he will take more lives than he will save, which is what any normal person would think. In addition to this, Ramses is also extremely believable. Even though he seems incredibly bratty and whiny, but by the end you can relate to him. He's a good person, but is fed up of things not being perfect for him, something we've all felt at some point. Despite this, the over all narrative is incredibly generic, and does absolutely nothing to make this classic tale original, and is full of under devolved and cliche characters (apart from Ramses and Moses). Ramses father, for example, is just a huge douche bag with no real explanation of why he's like this. Also we never connect to the people Moses is trying to save, making us care more about Moses safety more than him saving everyone else. But the most disappointing part of this movie comes when it reaches the half way mark. When your expecting all that tension to just come out in a beautifully done peace of emotional drama, it decides to rush through it. Basically, it comes down to, Ramses father banishes Moses, he dies, Ramses is now in charge and is douche. Why? We don't know! It just skips on and suddenly he's his dad! I was expecting a scene where the two argue and we see their friendship being torn apart through dialogue. Now the third act could have saved the movie. As mentioned before, Moses's dilemma is extremely compelling and is so interesting. Because of this though, it kind of makes God look like the villain here. He's brashly making this decision to potentially wipe out thousands and isn't even taking into account that he might wipe out his own people in process. But the plagues! Oh my god the plagues look amazing! One of the best parts of this film is just the grand scale of Egypt and how cool it looks. And when the plagues come down it just destroys everything and it looks awesome! Their vile and disgusting, yet look really realistic. If this where to happen in real life, this is how it would look. It mixes everything to amazing CGI to excellent audio to make an immersive experience. Unfortunately, the ending is a huge let down. The parting of the Red Sea is no where near as awe inspiring or grand as it should. Worsening the taste of this last morsel is the fact that the CGI takes a big turn around. The sea looked like a darker version of the Elder Scrolls Oblivion water! Did they run out of budget? And that's it! No ending, no finally face of between the two brothers, just done. In the end Exodus ends up being a let down, yet still a great emotional drama (at least in the first half) and an entertaining watch.… Expand

1 of 6 users found this helpful15

csw12

Aug 10, 2015

There is no escaping the dreadful monotonous first hour of Exodus: Gods and Kings. Thanks to a better made second half the movie becomes an average one at best.

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

EludiumQ36

Sep 4, 2015

The only way this gets a positive rating is if it's NOT compared to the classic "Ten Commandments", otherwise it's a shameful, waste of a remake. I barely got halfway through it before pulling the plug on its awfulness.

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

hotfromcauldron

Dec 16, 2014

In the beginning Viceroy Hegep says his problem is people are living longer. And so it is. Nowadays, we can see the original-the remake and even a second remake if we are lucky or unlucky enough. Exodus is
this generation's Cleopatra- an unspectacular spectacle of astronomical costs. MostIn the beginning Viceroy Hegep says his problem is people are living longer. And so it is. Nowadays, we can see the original-the remake and even a second remake if we are lucky or unlucky enough. Exodus is
this generation's Cleopatra- an unspectacular spectacle of astronomical costs. Most of the name actor's don't disappear into their characters ( especially weaver and turturro) - like liz and dick.
Bale - a miracle himself- an incredible child actor (empire of the sun) still going strong- gives his best though this isn't his best- as yet , another biblical character gone wild. What irritated me most was the message delivered by this omnipotent god- peace can only be achieved through violence. Why not just brain wash them like Hollywood does us?… Expand

2 of 4 users found this helpful22

TinoTrivino

Jan 4, 2016

Its not the Story which is bad and not true according to the history, its just.. that they use actors, really well known actors, that the begining of the movie seems to be a comedy... common, really? what is that!!!
but what is also a bit freightend is the zionist undertone, and i sayIts not the Story which is bad and not true according to the history, its just.. that they use actors, really well known actors, that the begining of the movie seems to be a comedy... common, really? what is that!!!
but what is also a bit freightend is the zionist undertone, and i say zionist not jewish, complet different things for me.
Really Mister Scott, At least you could use actors which no one knows, and without british accent :p… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

SEE ALL 121 REVIEWS