Summary:In 1983, a group of childhood friends pulled off the crime of the century: kidnapping one of the richest men in the world, the heir of the Heineken beer empire (Anthony Hopkins). The shocking capture—by gunpoint in broad daylight on the streets of Amsterdam—resulted in the largest ransom ever paid for a kidnapped individual. It was trulyIn 1983, a group of childhood friends pulled off the crime of the century: kidnapping one of the richest men in the world, the heir of the Heineken beer empire (Anthony Hopkins). The shocking capture—by gunpoint in broad daylight on the streets of Amsterdam—resulted in the largest ransom ever paid for a kidnapped individual. It was truly the perfect crime…until they got away with it.…Expand
Un casting extra, et plutôt deux fois qu'une, une affiche qui rassemble Anthony Hopkins, Sam Worthington et Jim Sturgess pour les plus connus, avec un scénar inspiré d'une histoire vraie, ce film doit frôler l'excellence ?
Mais alors, pourquoi n'a-t-il eu aucune programmation au cinéma ?Un casting extra, et plutôt deux fois qu'une, une affiche qui rassemble Anthony Hopkins, Sam Worthington et Jim Sturgess pour les plus connus, avec un scénar inspiré d'une histoire vraie, ce film doit frôler l'excellence ?
Mais alors, pourquoi n'a-t-il eu aucune programmation au cinéma ?
Je vais tenter de répondre à cette question, sans rien dévoiler du suspens qu'offre se long métrage.
Sans être pour autant super-déçu, je m'attendais quand même à mieux, surtout dans la mise en scène. En effet, Daniel Alfredson n'a absolument pas cherché plus loin que le kidnapping, la genèse manque de profondeur, le poumon de cette histoire aurait dû être beaucoup plus convaincant. La présentation des cinq protagonistes ne m'a absolument pas touché, aucune émotion, aucune motivation autre que le manque d'argent n'a été exploité pour que l'on s'attache un minimum aux personnages. Dommage !
Un divertissement honnête pour un dimanche après-midi avec une bonne bière ;).…Expand
The movie was relatively entertaining, the acting was good and the story was interesting. Even though there are a few plot holes here and there and some moments can be pretty boring, it's still not a bad movie.
Critics were after this one. It's true that doesn't do anything great. But it manages to do almost everything "ok". Maybe the biggest problem is that it looks lazy, because they don't bring anything really great in any aspect. It lacks a bit of strenght on the emotion, witts on the dialogue,Critics were after this one. It's true that doesn't do anything great. But it manages to do almost everything "ok". Maybe the biggest problem is that it looks lazy, because they don't bring anything really great in any aspect. It lacks a bit of strenght on the emotion, witts on the dialogue, intelligence on the plot... etc. But is not bad…Expand
As tedious as being imprisoned for several weeks. How a crime drama with such good cast can be so dull is borderline a crime. The actors are good, but the characters they play have the personality of barren unsympathetic schmucks. The screenplay and conversation are dry, primarily dabblingAs tedious as being imprisoned for several weeks. How a crime drama with such good cast can be so dull is borderline a crime. The actors are good, but the characters they play have the personality of barren unsympathetic schmucks. The screenplay and conversation are dry, primarily dabbling in curses and complaints for nearly the entire movie. While there are clearly a couple of good moments by the actors, they are too few to sustain interest for the rest of boring banters.
Kidnapping Mr. Heineken is exactly what it advertises, the story of five men who are down on their luck and decide to snatch a billionaire in hope for monetary gain. It's amazing that none of these five characters is even close to being relatable. The movie tries to depict individuals who are pushed to do illegal things by the circumstance, yet they are all manipulative, aggressive and severely lacking empathy.
At latter half they are even interchangeable since everyone has a knack for whining, in exception of Sam Worthington's character who surprises audience with poor and crazy decisions. Probably the best decision the movie did was to put Anthony Hopkins as Heineken in a box and let him do a few monologues. Still, there is no tangible connection between Heineken and the kidnappers, there's not even connection between the kidnappers themselves. When the movie tries to pull friendship theme, it only makes things more awkward.
For action crime, one would expect an intelligent plot, perhaps major twists and thought out plans, sadly there's a barely any level of sophistication here as five of them partially wing it and hope for the best. In fact, most of the times they are just fooling around, laughing annoyingly and verbally abusing each other. As for action scenes, majority of TV shows will offer more than this movie.
The film offers the shallow sense of helplessness and uneasiness as audience watch five aversive men threatening an old man for money and bicker with each other.…Expand
A complete disappointment, it's a shame to see an actor like Anthony Hopkins reduced to this kind of flimsy and totally disposable papers, the same happens with Jim Sturgess and Sam Worthington who since Avatar is virtually gone, both promises that were erased over time. I do not recommend it.