King Kong

Name: King Kong
Genre: Adventure, Horror
Released: December 17, 1976
Duration: 134 min
Rating: 61
Cast: Charles Grodin, Dennis Fimple, Ed Lauter, Jack O'Halloran, Jeff Bridges

1976

METASCORE

Generally favorable reviews based on 11 Critic Reviews

See All

USER SCORE

Generally favorable reviews based on 17 Ratings

See All

6.9

VOTE NOW

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

6.9	Your Score
6.9	User Score Generally favorable reviews based on 17 Ratings

Would you like to write a review?

There is a 75 character minimum for reviews. If your review contains spoilers, please check the Spoiler box. Please do not use ALL CAPS. There is no linking or other HTML allowed. Your review may be edited for content. 0/5000

Check box if your review contains spoilers

Play Sound

Please enter your birth date to watch this video:

You are not allowed to view this material at this time.

King Kong

Now Playing: King Kong

Movie Details & Credits

Paramount Pictures | Release Date: December 17, 1976 | PG

Starring: Charles Grodin, Dennis Fimple, Ed Lauter, Jack O'Halloran, Jeff Bridges, Jessica Lange, John Randolph, Jorge Moreno, Julius Harris, René Auberjonois

Summary: A petroleum exploration expedition comes to an isolated island and encounters a colossal giant gorilla.

Director: John Guillermin

Genre(s): Adventure, Horror

Rating: PG

Runtime: 134 min

See All Details and Credits

Watch Now

Buy on

Stream On

Expand

Metascore

Positive:

Mixed:

Negative:

Critic Reviews

Richard Schickel

The special effects are marvelous, the good-humored script is comic-bookish without being excessively campy, and there are two excellent performances. Read full review

Keith Phipps

I’m still deeply fond of De Laurentiis’ King Kong now, no doubt in part because we’ll never see its likes again. Whatever the failings of its ape effects, they have a tangible quality that even Jackson’s great CGI work couldn’t fake. Read full review

Staff (Not Credited)

Faithful in substantial degree not only to the letter but also the spirit of the 1933 classic for RKO, this $22 million-plus version neatly balances superb special effects with solid dramatic credibility. Read full review

Staff (Not Credited)

The results of this technological bonanza are pretty mixed. Read full review

Empire Kim Newman

The lamest of the three versions but the performances are bearable. Read full review

Dave Kehr

Reducing one of the most compelling cultural icons of the century to a comic book character, this $22 million project makes a passable kiddie show, and not much else. Read full review

TV Guide Magazine Staff (Not Credited)

Without a doubt, De Laurentiis' remake of Cooper and Schoedsack's classic is the biggest con job ever pulled on the unsuspecting American public. Read full review

SEE ALL 11 REVIEWS

Write a Review

User Reviews

JakeLeM

Jun 10, 2021

I know given the slate of newer films we get every year with better and more advanced technology, it’s easy to dismiss older films as fake looking and not worth seeing but I’d argue giving even just one a chance you might find yourself a new favorite film like I did. Thank you Shout FactoryI know given the slate of newer films we get every year with better and more advanced technology, it’s easy to dismiss older films as fake looking and not worth seeing but I’d argue giving even just one a chance you might find yourself a new favorite film like I did. Thank you Shout Factory for an amazing re-release Blu-ray.
Simply put King Kong brings me immense joy as a cinephile and someone who appreciates all the hard work that goes into filmmaking as a whole. Perhaps what I adore even more is that clearly from the get-go this film knows what it set out to do when it was made. While Dino De Laurentiis wasn’t the greatest person around ( Meryl Streep incident) he was ambitious enough to challenge Jaws for the biggest monster flick and wanted to create what the poster says the most exciting motion picture event of all time. For many children of that Christmas of 1976, it was, and I’d argue it still is even with the 05 remake. Instead of being a shot for shot remake of the classic 1933 Kong Dino and company reworked the story to fit into the time period of the 70s.
Choosing to do this turns people off who adore the classic but for me it makes it stand out on its own and embraces its newly found story and shows off the technology that was available during the year it was made. Seeing how they combined practical effects with Rick Baker’s suit looks beautiful and at times real except that snake. I love seeing how the mechanical arms interacted with the actors and certain scenes. Jessica Lange is wonderful and even though her character is no Anna Darrow and more of an airhead she’s stunning and gives the film the emotional weight for beauty and beast. Jeff Bridges has never looked better , his hair makes me envious just so luscious. Charles Grodin as the villain was brilliant casting he steals every scene he’s in and gives a dashing turn for the oil tycoon who seeks it all for personal gain. John Barry delivers a beautiful score that makes the emotional scenes hit home.
Also, the finale is changed up instead of the empire state building we get the twin towers which look beyond stunning , I give Dino props for doing something different and giving it good reasoning behind it.
Overall, I adore King Kong 76, it’s no means a perfect film but for me it set out what to do. Be the biggest blockbuster of its Era. All hail the mighty Kong the eighth wonder of the world.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

SEE ALL 1 REVIEWS