Maps to the Stars
Focus World | Release Date: February 27, 2015
6.0
USER SCORE
Mixed or average reviews based on 97 Ratings
USER RATING DISTRIBUTION
Positive:
41
Mixed:
39
Negative:
17
Watch Now
Stream On
Buy on
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Expand
Review this movie
VOTE NOW
 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Check box if your review contains spoilers 0 characters (5000 max)

User Reviews

User scoreBy dateMost helpful
7
beingryanjudeMar 1, 2015
A highly entertaining, yet dark look at the Hollywood lifestyle and those involved and affected by it. Featuring a strong ensemble of unusual suspects, lead by Julianne Moore's fine performance.
2 of 2 users found this helpful20
All this user's reviews
10
katezoeFeb 28, 2015
Pitch perfect movie about Hollywood and how incestous it is figuratively and literraly. Julianne Morre gives one of the bravest no holds barred performances for an A list actress I have ever seen. Screenplay amazing and this is one of DavidPitch perfect movie about Hollywood and how incestous it is figuratively and literraly. Julianne Morre gives one of the bravest no holds barred performances for an A list actress I have ever seen. Screenplay amazing and this is one of David Cronenberg's best film.… Expand
2 of 2 users found this helpful20
All this user's reviews
8
danippMar 13, 2015
Crazy, funny, scary, with an incredible Julianne Moore. It's clear why this movie didn't get a 2014 release and why the Academy preferred Moore in Still Alice, since it makes a huge critic to Hollywood, including mentions of names like DemiCrazy, funny, scary, with an incredible Julianne Moore. It's clear why this movie didn't get a 2014 release and why the Academy preferred Moore in Still Alice, since it makes a huge critic to Hollywood, including mentions of names like Demi Lovato, Garry Marshall and even Harvey Weinstein. But I liked how Cronenberg and Wagner explored the politics, fame and behavior of big stars. They're not lying, they're showing something real that many people don't wanna see. Besides the world of movies and celebrities, Maps to the Stars tells a bizarre story about a family and a star who has issues with her abusive dead mother. Mia Wasikowska is also amazing in this surpising movie. I recommend!… Expand
1 of 1 users found this helpful10
All this user's reviews
8
avr50May 26, 2017
Maps to the stars is a unique movie. It has great actors delivering really good performances (Julianne Moore is the best) a first class director and a Cannes Film Festival Selection logo on the poster. This will be a movie for a ten, butMaps to the stars is a unique movie. It has great actors delivering really good performances (Julianne Moore is the best) a first class director and a Cannes Film Festival Selection logo on the poster. This will be a movie for a ten, but something´s missing, a better script. The script has some fails that make the movie seem a little improvised, with scenes that are over the top and situations very predictable and a very dissapointing ending. However, this movie (at least until the end) delievers a really creepy version of Hollywood that is valid and unfortunately truth… Expand
1 of 1 users found this helpful10
All this user's reviews
1
csw12Mar 3, 2015
An abysmal failure of a film. Maps to the stars has some of the most unlikable characters in any film this year. Uninteresting, incoherent at times, and one of the worst films this year.
1 of 2 users found this helpful11
All this user's reviews
0
dierregiFeb 27, 2015
This is the story of a bunch of creeps, Hollywood-style. If you can sympathise with the following characters, you probably will like the movie:

*Benji, ex-junkie teenager TV show star, jealous about child actors; *Cristina and Stafford,This is the story of a bunch of creeps, Hollywood-style. If you can sympathise with the following characters, you probably will like the movie:

*Benji, ex-junkie teenager TV show star, jealous about child actors; *Cristina and Stafford, couple of weirdos parents, exploiting said teenage junkie; *Agatha, homicidal schizophrenic girl stalking her family; *Havana, washed up movie actress consumed by the desire of playing her mother's part in a remake.

On the other hand, if you think that the rich are different from you and I and you find it difficult to feel empathy for a "poor" kid who will earn only 6 million per season instead of 8, you might not get the point of this flaccid tale. Unless that is "even rich people have their problems".

If emotional engagement is not your thing, you might still have problems with the script and editing. The movie contains several overlong scenes that add nothing to story, except underlining how depraved people are in Hollywood. The party scene, with the despicable conversation among teenagers is a very good example.

Then there is a scene with Havana, the Moore character, sitting on the crapper and farting away, while having a conversation with her assistant. This is usually described as "vanity-free" interpretation by the critics. Which means Hollywood stars looking like you and me in the morning, rather than their red-carpet version. In turn, this is interpreted as "mega-stars demeaning their supernatural status, thus deserving an Oscar".

Finally, several "ghost scenes" are scattered liberally in the story. They are among the worst I have ever seen, Havana's ghost mum being the most risible of the bunch.

Eventually bad things happen to bad people and the movie ends not a second too soon, but who cares: this is a movie –as somebody wrote – that you want to forget you saw.… Expand
0 of 6 users found this helpful06
All this user's reviews
3
manofthemoonMar 6, 2015
Cronenberg continues to try and make us care for rich narcissists and again fails. Characters without depth or sympathy in a story that drifts from one genre into vague horror by the end. So much potential wasted. The performances, however,Cronenberg continues to try and make us care for rich narcissists and again fails. Characters without depth or sympathy in a story that drifts from one genre into vague horror by the end. So much potential wasted. The performances, however, are very strong, especially Moore and Cusack. By the end, I just didn't care about Hollywood and its "problems". There are better stories to be told and Cronenberg no longer seems to be the man to tell them.… Expand
0 of 3 users found this helpful03
All this user's reviews
2
hotfromcauldronFeb 27, 2015
Map to the Stars gets lost somewhere between Robert Altman lite and Sofia Coppola cool. Cronenberg' s family affair has more issues than a psych 101 textbook including arson, addiction and abuse. A way too inside edition of "sick degrees ofMap to the Stars gets lost somewhere between Robert Altman lite and Sofia Coppola cool. Cronenberg' s family affair has more issues than a psych 101 textbook including arson, addiction and abuse. A way too inside edition of "sick degrees of separation" that leaves one ecstatic for each character's comeuppance. An Oscar prediction- Julianne Moore would have lost for Still Alice if this film was released three months ago as Eddie Murphy did for Dreamgirls on the heels of Norbit.… Expand
0 of 2 users found this helpful02
All this user's reviews
5
SpangleDec 8, 2015
Maps to the Stars is a deeply flawed film that is all over the place. Each scene feels loosely connected at best and though it is a captivating look at stars and fame, it just falls apart slowly throughout the film. The acting is very good,Maps to the Stars is a deeply flawed film that is all over the place. Each scene feels loosely connected at best and though it is a captivating look at stars and fame, it just falls apart slowly throughout the film. The acting is very good, but that does not save this one from feeling like a beautiful mess at times. David Cronenberg is a great director, but just did not have control over this one, but for the great portrayal of Hollywood, this one is anything but a disaster. Though messy, it is very captivating and very well shot and would be interesting to place under a microscope to figure out what it all means. However, on the whole, Maps to the Stars just falls flat and does not live up to the performances of its stars.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
1
foxgroveMar 8, 2015
David Cronenberg is no stranger to controversial or bizarre material but he probably has more misses than hits in his film canon. His best films have strong narratives and lack ambiguity of which 'Eastern Promises' and 'A History of Violence'David Cronenberg is no stranger to controversial or bizarre material but he probably has more misses than hits in his film canon. His best films have strong narratives and lack ambiguity of which 'Eastern Promises' and 'A History of Violence' are great examples. Both, incidentally, starring Viggo Mortenson.
Maps to the stars is not only ambiguous, it's also a load of pretentious mumbo jumbo. Julianne Moore, herself an advocate for edgy material, won best actress at Cannes for her role. However, anything good in her performance is cancelled out by a lack of clarity and poor direction. Every character comes over as unsympathetic and an unusually varied cast do not gel well. John Cusack in particular seems out of his depth. One is relieved when it ends and further analysis of what has transpired is as pointless as it is unwanted. I had high hopes initially, arriving as it did with critical and festival kudos, but it can join 'The Naked Lunch' as a first class clinker and be written off as another failed experiment from Cronenberg.
The last scene in the film is actually the best although this is not actually a compliment but more of an acknowledgement of something, ANYTHING, actually happening!… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
LeZeeSep 29, 2016
Not about the night stars, but the Hollywood's.

The title gives an impression of someone lost in somewhere and trying to find a way back home. I did not know what this film was about. I did not know who stars in it and when it released.Not about the night stars, but the Hollywood's.

The title gives an impression of someone lost in somewhere and trying to find a way back home. I did not know what this film was about. I did not know who stars in it and when it released. But I decided to watch it at the last minute without checking out its synopsis and I ended up satisfied. Not fully pleased, but the refreshing story and its characters interested me.

This is an unusual drama that takes place in a district where the Hollywood people are dominated. Our tale opens with a young woman arriving there and soon gets an opportunity to become a famous artist's personal assistant. The film also focuses others tales, so it is a multi layered story. But all of them are somewhere connected; particularly at the end. Revealing everyone's agenda behind their act is what brings the conclusion to the tale.

Not neatly told story, yet different. I would say futuristic theme. I liked the performances. Robert Pattinson was not in a major role, but the other like Mia Wasikowska, Julianne Moore were good. Revolving around the bunch film celebrities means there's no real ones involved with the real names, just mentioned the names who were not in the film. Hard to predict the story, I was not sure until it revealed itself everything at the end. That part was a quite a shock, not I expected, but that's the real twist. Overall film was decent, slightly it missed to be a great. I feel it is worth a watch if you want something new in the story.

6.5/10… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
6
ThegodfathersonFeb 28, 2015
Cronenberg's horrifying insight into Hollywood's craziest is a punch to the gut. The acting by Julianne Moore is brilliant and she keeps getting better each time. The story is dissapointing, its creepy and full of unexpected twists coming outCronenberg's horrifying insight into Hollywood's craziest is a punch to the gut. The acting by Julianne Moore is brilliant and she keeps getting better each time. The story is dissapointing, its creepy and full of unexpected twists coming out of nowhere. The odd characters and bloody violent scenes including a head being bashed in by an award, are weird. Maps To The Stars is not as good as I wanted it to be. But it delivers Moore's greatest performance in years, also there is some thrills and popcorn violence fun to be had in Cronenberg's nightmarish potboiler.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
BrianMcCriticAug 22, 2015
While this film made me feel a bit dirty I got to admit I was strangely entertained. Everyone in this film are disturbed in ways that only Hollywood could produce. I really thought the hopeless whining of Julianne Moore would get reallyWhile this film made me feel a bit dirty I got to admit I was strangely entertained. Everyone in this film are disturbed in ways that only Hollywood could produce. I really thought the hopeless whining of Julianne Moore would get really annoying instead I was mesmerized by her performance. Cronenberg's last film Cosmopolis was a head scratcher with ridiculous dialogue. This one gets him back on track. A-… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
frankrog29May 2, 2015
David Cronenberg is one of the most original and fearless directors working today. Maps to the Stars is one of his more disturbing movies, but it is also uncannily beautiful at times. All of the characters are in the entertainment business.David Cronenberg is one of the most original and fearless directors working today. Maps to the Stars is one of his more disturbing movies, but it is also uncannily beautiful at times. All of the characters are in the entertainment business. The characters are trying to obtain spirituality but failing because of their superficial, materialistic environment. They seek solace in their family members, who are both their saviors and their worst enemies. This movie is ultimately about the love/hate relationships that family members often share. Mr. Cronenberg's movies are works of art that provoke the viewer, rather than placate him or her like many movies are content to do these days.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
5
Brent_MarchantFeb 28, 2015
Despite terrific performances by Julianne Moore, Mia Wasikowska and Evan Bird, as well as some bitingly funny lines, this satirical Hollywood cautionary tale never quite hits its stride, with too many underdeveloped tangents that detract fromDespite terrific performances by Julianne Moore, Mia Wasikowska and Evan Bird, as well as some bitingly funny lines, this satirical Hollywood cautionary tale never quite hits its stride, with too many underdeveloped tangents that detract from the main story line. The film never quite lives up to its potential, despite the introduction of what initially appear to be some novel narrative elements. Its strengths, regrettably, become lost amidst a plethora of half-baked plot devices, keeping the picture from reaching what it might have become.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
5
WJSSep 11, 2015
Very strange movie definitely in the weird Cronenberg style. It's listed here as a comedy but I didn't find anything very funny. It's a bizarre take on the ins and outs of the minds of Hollywood. The acting is pretty good (it's almost likeVery strange movie definitely in the weird Cronenberg style. It's listed here as a comedy but I didn't find anything very funny. It's a bizarre take on the ins and outs of the minds of Hollywood. The acting is pretty good (it's almost like Julianne Moore is channeling Lindsay Lohan). I don't think I really liked it very much; it's just way too strange and not really my cup of tea.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
5
MattBrady99Jul 7, 2015
Cronenberg your so much better then this.

Maps to the Stars follows the lives of the Weiss family - pure Hollywood royalty - including the father, a self-help guru, mother who dotes on 13-year-old Benji - fresh out of rehab and daughterCronenberg your so much better then this.

Maps to the Stars follows the lives of the Weiss family - pure Hollywood royalty - including the father, a self-help guru, mother who dotes on 13-year-old Benji - fresh out of rehab and daughter Agatha a recently-released pyromaniac.

I heard some mix things from Maps to the Stars and that's mostly the reviews it got and yes I do read other critics reviews and other websites like Rotten Tomatoes, but at the end of the day you can't trust RT sometimes, I mean Sharknado get's a 82% ?. I also found out that this movie won Best Actress at The Cannes Film Festival and the best actress went to Julianne Moore which she beat out Anne Dorval for Mommy, in which I disagree with that and I will tell you why later on. Before seeing Maps to the Stars I had low exceptions and wasn't all that excited for it, but I thought since the movie had a big cast and a good director behind it I thought it might be great. After seeing Maps to the Stars I wasn't all that impressed.

The director of the David Cronenberg and he's the kind of director that made some great movies that I think is some of he's best work but he also did some movies that isn't all that great. The Fly, Eastern Promises , A History of Violence and my biggest guilty pleasure of all time Scanners. Those movies are the ones we remember best from him and I thought a movie like this would somehow work for him as maybe he can make this story messed up but always keep my interested, well that's not the case here. I felt like he lost he's touch in this movie like these scene in this movie were a women get's set on fire and oh my god the CG for the fire looked so freaking bad and it really took me out of movie, I mean normally Cronenberg would have use practical effect's back in the 80's or 90's; so happened here?. There was another flaw that I spotted in the movie and that was every time the character's are out side in a open area with cars driving past them but here's the thing they was no sound at all when the cars drive by and the characters wasn't far away from the road but quite near the road. I don't know if this was stylistic choice for the director to blend in the with tone for the movies atmosphere I guest, but I don't see it as that but more of a mess up as this happened more then once and that other time is where these kids are at a party with loud music in the background but we somehow can hear them and they can hear each other. Kind of a cliche Cronenberg.

The other real reason I watch this movie is because of Julianne Moore performance as she won Best Actress at The Cannes Film Festival and Anne Dorval was also nominated but didn't win. So I wondered if Moore's performance was better than Anne Dorval so I watch to judge to see who's better and overall Anne Dorval did a much much better performance than Julianne Moore performance. Julianne Moore didn't do a bad performance, I mean she did good in the movie but Anne Dorval deserved that award more as Dorval broke my heart in the movie Mommy and her performance felt real and easy to get a connect with her character. But with Julianne Moore the only thing I saw was Julianne Moore acting and making some hilarious scenes that I couldn't take seriously. I'm happy that Moore picked a different role from her usual roles and she is good in the movie, but I think Anne Dorval was way better.

Some of the well known actors in this movie were good, but the good stops there as the rest of the actors are just awful in this movie. Like Robert Pattinson wasn't all that great in the movie, it wasn't Twilight bad he just did nothing really special and I know he's better then this. Evan Bird was pretty bad as the **** kid actor but Evan Bird didn't really pull that off and he's reaction to things that suppose to shock him or scary him well he just looked bored.

The movie is also pretty predicable as well. Like these a scene in the movie were Evan Bird character as a real gun that he thinks he empty out all the bullets and he starts waving it around pretending to be shooting it and at one point he starts pointing it to he's head pretending to shoot himself. I predicted what was going to happened and it actually freaking happened. Same again in another scene later on.

This is one of those I saw a ghost kind of stories that's been done to death in recent movies but I would have love if they did something new and even creative with a story like this, but here it's not.

Overall Maps to the Star is a movie that could have been something good coming from a director like David Cronenberg. I know this review may sound like I'm hated everything in this movie but here's the thing this isn't the worst movie I've ever seen, but I'm just naming off flaws in the movie as it's not awful but it's pretty far from perfect.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
5
DRauchDoes2015Apr 15, 2015
Maps to the Stars is a scattered collection of repulsive characters, some less so than others but, aye, there is nary a sympathetic individual to relate to here. The experience of enduring their forced company is a combination of horrifiedMaps to the Stars is a scattered collection of repulsive characters, some less so than others but, aye, there is nary a sympathetic individual to relate to here. The experience of enduring their forced company is a combination of horrified revulsion, bizarre fascination, and occasional boredom, despite the unrelenting steamroller of antipathetic sentiments. Cronenberg's motive for displaying such abhorrent behavior is in the service of a painfully obvious, yet watchable critique of hollywood, one that doesn't succeed entirely for two reasons. They are (1) how the multiple interweaving characters don't thematically cohere by the conclusion, rendering the significance of their stories hollow, and (2) the loathsome qualities of Hollywood Cronenberg takes aim at being either over-exaggerated for shock value or crude and dull.

Cronenberg adds a supernatural element that, though absurd and melodramatic, adds a touch of distinction to an otherwise reality-grounded tale. This is also a movie that, however misguided and hyperbolic, is fearless in it's presentation. Evident of this is the unabashedly unflattering light cast upon the actors, many rising above it and delivering noteworthy work, particularly the multi-dimensional, accolade-worthy performance by Julianne Moore (seriously, one of her all-time best characters), an uncompromisingly ugly and monstrous creation that borders on villainous, yet is also pitiable and damaged.

Cronenberg can still create disquieting films. Even though Maps to the Stars is jumbled, I can't say I wasn't challenged. The character of Benji, a drug addicted rising star brat is vulgar, barbaric, and downright loathsome. He is brought to life by young actor Evan Bird with an aplomb beyond his years, whose age-to-explicitity ratio reminds me of Chloe Grace Moretz's controversial star turn in Kick-Ass. Also included in Maps to the Stars is a storyline involving incest, an overall indulgence in gratuitous sex and drug abuse, the manipulation of a child's death to further someone's career, and numerous instances of self-serving behavior masked behind a facade of passive aggression. Some of this has become commonplace in tales of excess, but there are occasional developments that I see as unprecedented (did I mention the incest plot line?).

That being said, Cronenberg places all of these potential shock-worthy elements in the service of story that as a whole only intermittently tries to dispense meaning to the proceedings, and it ends on a regressively non-resolute note. When he pitches a scene satirically, the results are often so stone-faced that the line is blurred as to whether or not the cast is in on the 'joke', or if Cronenberg was even trying to be funny in the first place. Some attempts land (I found the quip where Robert Pattinson considers joining the church of Scientology to advance his career pretty left-field), but many of the jabs at hollywood are just as artificial and surface-level as the subject he means to criticize.

But then again, it never is easy to generalize any of the films of David Cronenberg. He often hovers in that odd area of provocation, queasy discomfort, brilliance, and abstraction, and in this work of his, it isn't elucidated as to what it is he's trying to say, more so than many of his other films. I don't mean that he should dumb down his output or avoid challenging his audience, those are the qualities I regard in his work. I do think that, as is the case of Maps to the Stars, he tends to send us down a rabbit-hole of his own unique design where even he doesn't know it leads to. So, yeah, Maps is a bit of a miss for him. It left me feeling sour and perturbed, in a good way, but also indifferent, in a bad way. A mixed bag.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
3
Stargirl04May 15, 2016
I usually love David's work but this one was a bit slow for me. It held my interest but it could have been better. Great Cast but a little underwhelming for me.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
DeanomiteFeb 18, 2020
Anything by Cronenberg gets an inspection, this has Robert Pattinson between Twilight and Batman, he is good in this. Carrie Fisher plays herself, interesting. Photography is well done, palette has nice greens and lighting. Something aboutAnything by Cronenberg gets an inspection, this has Robert Pattinson between Twilight and Batman, he is good in this. Carrie Fisher plays herself, interesting. Photography is well done, palette has nice greens and lighting. Something about Julianne Moore, she is exhausting in everything I see her in. I gave up half way through, it just was not interesting. Narcissistic people are always so obsessed with themselves they are boring to me.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
More From This Movie

67 Critic Reviews

6.0 User Reviews

Details & Credits|Trailers

Current Movie Releases
By MetascoreBy User Score
1 78 John Wick: Chapter 4
2 73 Creed III
3 67 Avatar: The Way of Water
4 63 Knock at the Cabin
5 62 Plane
SEE ALL
Essential Links
New on Amazon Prime Video
New on Netflix
Coming Soon to DVD/Blu-ray
SEE ALL