Paramount Pictures | Release Date: December 25, 2003
8.0
USER SCORE
Generally favorable reviews based on 235 Ratings
USER RATING DISTRIBUTION
Positive:
187
Mixed:
25
Negative:
23
Watch Now
Stream On
Stream On
Buy on
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Expand
Review this movie
VOTE NOW
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Check box if your review contains spoilers 0 characters (5000 max)
8
AbolishAug 21, 2021
●¡●¡●¡●¡●¡●¡●¡●¡●¡●¡●¡●¡●¡●¡●¡●¡●¡●¡●¡●¡●¡●
■¡■¡■¡■¡■¡■¡■¡■¡■¡■¡■÷*÷*÷*÷*÷*÷*÷*÷*÷*÷*÷*÷*÷*÷*
1 of 1 users found this helpful10
All this user's reviews
8
beeanadouMay 20, 2018
With some many time travel themed movies nowadays, this one doesn't appear very outstanding, but overall a satisfying work.
8 of 9 users found this helpful81
All this user's reviews
8
HolographicJan 21, 2020
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Paycheck has a convoluted plot that is involving. Affleck, Thurman & Eckhart give solid acting and they all act well in their scenes. These 3 never make movies together. All of their acting fuels the movie and Woo's direction is top notch as always. There is his trademark slow motion action, and his signature shots. Paycheck is an underrated sci-fi actioner that delivers everything you expect, wrapped up in an appealing package. Expand
8 of 9 users found this helpful81
All this user's reviews
8
SolariumJan 12, 2020
B+ *************************************************************************
5 of 6 users found this helpful51
All this user's reviews
8
OxcartNov 25, 2012
Paycheck is one of those movies that had the potential to be really, truly great, but due to a series of small problems, ended up as less than it could have been and largely ignored. In short (and you can get this from the trailer), BenPaycheck is one of those movies that had the potential to be really, truly great, but due to a series of small problems, ended up as less than it could have been and largely ignored. In short (and you can get this from the trailer), Ben Affleck plays a gifted engineer whose particular talent lies in reverse-engineering a company's product so that a competitor can get a head-start to market. In order to maintain deniability, his memory of each job is wiped, leaving him with just a paycheck (hence the title). But after accepting a long-term job, he finds himself a wanted man with no clue why, just a lot of questions. An outstanding premise. It is made all the better by creative writing, particularly the inclusion of a MacGuyver-esque puzzle that wends its way through the entire plot of the film. Dialogue is generally well written, only rarely losing its real-world edge (which is forgivable). Outstanding performances are turned in by Ben Affleck, Uma Thurman, Paul Giamatti, Aaron Eckhart, Colm Feore, and Joe Morton -- who, although given a relatively thin part, managed to turn it into a major, dynamic element of the plot and really shines. John Powell's original score was outstanding and a perfect balance of driving action music and reflective melodies when appropriate. Really, the faults of the film lie with John Woo, whose now-trite directorial hallmarks end up making their appearances in the film self-ridicule rather than poignant moment. (John, if you're reading: get rid of the flying dove gimmick. It was ridiculous in Mission Impossible 2, and it was ridiculous here. It's a joke, not art.) Woo is still an excellent action director, and the car chases, fight sequences, and other action-driven sections of the film do well by him. But someone else needs to take over when the fists and tires aren't flying; it's only the innate acting ability of people like Affleck, Thurman, and others (did I mention Joe Morton did a great job?) that save some sections of the film. Casting was bang-on, though, and Paul Giamatti does an A+ perfect job as the Voice of Reason and comic relief -- one of those blessed times that you don't groan inwardly when the comic relief character shows up; Giamatti does an exemplary job. And even though the film is, as of this writing, nearly a decade old, it doesn't come off as stale sci-fi -- a rarity. It is definitely worth watching if you're any kind of sci-fi fan (it comes from the mind of Philip K Dick...check out how many of his stories became wildly popular films) -- find a copy and have fun. Expand
14 of 17 users found this helpful143
All this user's reviews
8
ExcommunicadoJan 19, 2020
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. John Woo originally did not want to do his trademark "Mexican Standoff" in this film, but Ben Affleck begged Woo to include the scene, having been a big fan of Woo's films The Killer (1989) and Hard Boiled (1992) Expand
4 of 5 users found this helpful41
All this user's reviews
8
SammyskillMar 14, 2021
Well scripted and well acted worth a watch It just needs a hd update and the film would fit well in today’s viewing
4 of 5 users found this helpful41
All this user's reviews
8
Rave104Apr 9, 2021
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. John Woo originally did not want to do his trademark "Mexican Standoff" in this film, but Ben Affleck begged Woo to include the scene, having been a big fan of Woo's films The Killer (1989) and Hard Boiled (1992). Expand
4 of 5 users found this helpful41
All this user's reviews
8
Depose570May 16, 2021
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,ohihinininknknonnkininjojojoonni●●●●●■■■■■□□□□○○○○▪▪⊙°••••••••••■■●●●●●
4 of 5 users found this helpful41
All this user's reviews
8
Catenary44Jun 7, 2021
$.$.$.$.$.$.$.$.$.$.$.$.$.$.$.$.$.$.$.$.$.$.$.$.$.$.$.$.
》■》■》■》■》■》■》■》■》■》■》■》■》■》■》■》■
4 of 5 users found this helpful41
All this user's reviews
8
Pluto744Jun 19, 2021
●°●°●°●°●°●°●°●°●°●°●°●°●°●°●°●°●°●°●°●°●°●
÷=_=_=_=_=_=_=_=_=_=_=_=_=_=_=_=_=_=_=_=_=_=_=_=_=_=_=_=
4 of 5 users found this helpful41
All this user's reviews
10
xahkdlys119Jun 9, 2012
I think that this movie has many twists and turns that is enough to keep people on the edge of their seats. And it surely has something to tell. It mentioned that predicting the future is something that we should not try to do. After all, II think that this movie has many twists and turns that is enough to keep people on the edge of their seats. And it surely has something to tell. It mentioned that predicting the future is something that we should not try to do. After all, I think that this is a very nice movie. Expand
13 of 17 users found this helpful134
All this user's reviews
8
Allogism944Jan 27, 2020
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Shorty: But that's not the question you should be asking yourself.

Michael Jennings: No?

Shorty: The question that you should be asking yourself is, why did *you* give up all that money? That's the most bizarre part of this whole thing. 90 million dollars. Nobody changes that much in three years! Okay. All right, buddy. I wanna figure out what you built. All right, let's work backwards.

Michael Jennings: They told me that I was working on a design by someone named Decker.

Shorty: Decker?

Michael Jennings: Yeah.

Shorty: William Decker?

Michael Jennings: I think so.

Shorty: What I heard was, he was working on something Level 5 for the Feds when they came in one day and they just shot him down.

Michael Jennings: What was it?

Shorty: Consensus was a laser.

Michael Jennings: Why was that?

Shorty: Because Decker's drawings called for a mirror and a lens. Now, the only thing that uses those things is a laser. Some kind of satellite...

[Jennings is distracted by a wall television announcing the Lotto numbers]

Shorty: The lens required perfect optics. Uh, the mirror and the neutrino count... I mean, word was, the thing was going to cost 500 billion dollars. Now, who's going to spend 500 billion dollars just to see something?

[Shorty realizes Jennings has heard very little of his explanation]

Shorty: What?

Michael Jennings: There's no way I got out of that Extraction Room without the cigarettes and the glasses. I would have never gotten on that bus without the bus ticket. If I didn't have the diamond ring, I wouldn't have followed that kid to Reddy Grant.

Shorty: Right.

Michael Jennings: [excited] I gave up that money just to make sure that I would pay attention to these items.

Shorty: Why?

Michael Jennings: [whispering intensely] Because I know what you'd spend 500 billion dollars to see. The future.

[Astounded, Shorty looks at the winning Lotto numbers in Michael's hand, and then up at the TV]
Expand
3 of 4 users found this helpful31
All this user's reviews
8
ReceptacleJun 22, 2021
++++++++++++++++++++++++++÷÷÷÷÷÷÷÷÷÷÷÷÷÷÷÷÷÷÷÷÷÷÷÷÷÷÷÷÷÷
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
3 of 4 users found this helpful31
All this user's reviews
8
Stagger74Jul 15, 2021
》》》》》》》》》》》》》》》》》》》》》》》》》》》》》》》》》》》¡
********************************************************
3 of 4 users found this helpful31
All this user's reviews
8
Exigent93Jun 4, 2021
,.,.,,,,,,,.,.,.,.,.,.,.$*$*$*$*$*$*$*$*$*$*$*$*$*$*$*$*
●》●》●》●》●》●》●》●》●》●》●》●》●》●》●》●》
2 of 3 users found this helpful21
All this user's reviews
8
Palindrome704Jun 28, 2021
¡¤¡¤¡¤¡¤¡¤¡¤¡¤¡¤¡¤¡¤¡¤¡¤¡¤¡¤¡¤¡¤¡¤¡¤¡¤¡•¡•¡¤¡•¡¤¡¤¡¤¡¤¡
•¡•¡•¡•¡•¡•¡•¡•¡•¡•¡•¡•¡•¡•¡•¡•¡•¡•¡•¡•¡•¡•¡•¡•¡•¡•¡•¡•¡
¡¤¡¤¡¤¡¤¡¤¡¤¡¤¡¤¡¤¡¤¡¤¡¤¡¤¡¤¡¤¡¤¡¤¡¤¡¤¡•¡•¡¤¡•¡¤¡¤¡¤¡¤¡
•¡•¡•¡•¡•¡•¡•¡•¡•¡•¡•¡•¡•¡•¡•¡•¡•¡•¡•¡•¡•¡•¡•¡•¡•¡•¡•¡•¡
2 of 3 users found this helpful21
All this user's reviews
8
Acquit77Jul 19, 2021
⊙⊙⊙⊙☆☆☆☆☆□□□⊙⊙⊙⊙⊙⊙⊙●■●■●■●■●■●■●■●
$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$÷%÷%÷%÷%÷%÷%÷%÷%÷%÷%÷%÷%
1 of 2 users found this helpful11
All this user's reviews
7
Tss5078Oct 13, 2014
While you may not know the name Phillip K. Dick, many of the biggest Science Fiction films of the last thirty years have been adaptations of his work. Dick is responsible for the films Blade Runner, The Terminator, Total Recall, MinorityWhile you may not know the name Phillip K. Dick, many of the biggest Science Fiction films of the last thirty years have been adaptations of his work. Dick is responsible for the films Blade Runner, The Terminator, Total Recall, Minority Report, and Paycheck just to name a few. Due to the popularity of his work in film and how successful they've been, even a lesser known work like Paycheck has been made into a film. The story includes many of the action sequences and interesting characters associated with Dick's stories, but Paycheck does lack the futuristic Science Fiction that has become Dick's signature, which is the main reason this story isn't as well known as his other works. The story takes place in modern day, where a man is offered an irresistible deal. Jennings (Ben Affleck) is told that if he works on a secret project for the next 3 years, he will receive 100 million dollars. The only catch being that after the 3 years are up, Jennings memory will be erased and he will have no idea what he worked on. As expected, Jennings accepts the deal and returns to his life 3 years later, but nothing is that simple. Soon everyone from the FBI to bounty hunters show up trying to get to him, and the only clues he has come from an envelope he sent himself, containing 19 random items that seem to have little or no value. Ben Affleck stars and by this point we all know how I feel about him. Affleck is a terrific Director, who seems to have little interest in acting anymore. Paycheck however is a 2003 film, a time before Affleck had proven himself and he shows that rare charisma that is only present in his real early work. His performance is outstanding and aided further by his chemistry with co-star Uma Thurman. Thurman is another performer who I find isn't very good unless she's in very specific type of role, and fortunately for Affleck, this is one of those roles. Paycheck is missing the big signature associated with Dick's work and will be somewhat disappointing to his fans. I did miss the futuristic element, but I was intrigued by the mystery Jennings was trying to solve and the 19 items. Combined with the action sequences, (that are always top notch) Paycheck isn't what I expected, but was still very well done and definitely worth watching. Expand
2 of 9 users found this helpful27
All this user's reviews
9
DWP102589May 24, 2004
[***SPOILERS***] I think I can explain what you don't understand Cameron S. All the machine does is read his palm and scan his brain to figure out what's MOST LIKELY to happen in his future. This, of course, can be changed, and his [***SPOILERS***] I think I can explain what you don't understand Cameron S. All the machine does is read his palm and scan his brain to figure out what's MOST LIKELY to happen in his future. This, of course, can be changed, and his having the items, changes the odds in his favor, creating a different MOST LIKELY future. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful