X
- 2018
- PG-13
- Lionsgate Films
- 1 h 56 m
- 2018
- PG-13
- Lionsgate Films
- 1 h 56 m
Summary Robin of Loxley (Taron Egerton), a war-hardened Crusader, and his Moorish commander (Jamie Foxx) mount an audacious revolt against the corrupt English crown.
Directed By: Otto Bathurst
Written By: Ben Chandler, David James Kelly
- 2018
- PG-13
- Lionsgate Films
- 1 h 56 m
- 2018
- PG-13
- Lionsgate Films
- 1 h 56 m
Robin Hood
32
3.8
Where to Watch
Summary Robin of Loxley (Taron Egerton), a war-hardened Crusader, and his Moorish commander (Jamie Foxx) mount an audacious revolt against the corrupt English crown.
Directed By: Otto Bathurst
Written By: Ben Chandler, David James Kelly
Where to Watch
Top Cast
Metascore
Generally Unfavorable
Based on 28 Critic Reviews
32
11% Positive
3 Reviews
3 Reviews
46% Mixed
13 Reviews
13 Reviews
43% Negative
12 Reviews
12 Reviews
Metascore
Generally Unfavorable
Based on 28 Critic Reviews
32
11% Positive
3 Reviews
3 Reviews
46% Mixed
13 Reviews
13 Reviews
43% Negative
12 Reviews
12 Reviews
Robin Hood is no classic, but if it sometimes seems like it’s trying to be “Baz Luhrmann’s Robin Hood,” more power to it. The movie is a diverting live-wire lark — one that, for my money, gets closer to the spirit of what Robin Hood is about than the logy 1991 Kevin Costner version or the dismal 2010 Russell Crowe version.
Say this and little else for the new Robin Hood movie: It’s less of a self-serious slog than the last Robin Hood movie.
User Score
Generally Unfavorable
Based on 175 User Ratings
3.8
21% Positive
37 Ratings
37 Ratings
29% Mixed
50 Ratings
50 Ratings
50% Negative
88 Ratings
88 Ratings
User Score
Generally Unfavorable
Based on 175 User Ratings
3.8
21% Positive
37 Ratings
37 Ratings
29% Mixed
50 Ratings
50 Ratings
50% Negative
88 Ratings
88 Ratings
great movie, the funny thing is that everyone of the bad reviews that it got. Sounded like everyone was saying the same thing, which make me wonder if that same person giving the review, or just a bunch of copy & pasting going on. Does anyone of them or him or her, know how CGI works. Plot holes huh, so if a movie makes you think to much it makes the movie bad. Remake do not always match, the new story line is about different type of robin hood. I mean look at blade runner, you guys rated the movie so high, yet it was slow and boring there was to much of no acting going on. I mean the whole movie felt like I was in national national geographic movie or something.
Report
On all fronts, it strives to twist the Robin Hood story into something more provocative, but ultimately it’s a garbled, hollow mess of attempts at relevancy.
Like Guy Ritchie’s King Arthur, this tries hard to do something new and exciting with an old formula. It quickly makes you wish for something more traditional and straightforward.
Egerton is miscast. He and Hewson have nary a spark in their love scenes. Dornan overplays his hand. Foxx belts out nearly every line as if he’s trying to be heard above a parade of fire engines on a Fourth of July parade
If nothing else, this accidentally hilarious, goofy train wreck of an origin story most definitely has the courage of its convictions. Alas, the film isn’t smart enough to recognize that its convictions are dumb, and it doesn’t have the goods to back them up in the first place.
Mendelsohn's villain is boringly one-note, Eve Hewson's Marion uses an incongruous Yank accent and always looks as though she's just stepped out of the makeup trailer, F. Murray Abraham swans around in fancy cardinal's vestments looking sinister and Foxx seems pissed off that he's not somewhere, perhaps anywhere, else. As for Egerton, he's a boy doing a man's job.
This is definitely better than the last Robin Hood movie done by Ridley Scott. The storyline is well done incorporating the crusades into the movie. The downfall for me was the fact that they shouldn't have introduced Maid Marian into the movie or have Robin have another love interest. It does have incredible special effects.
Report
So overall it felt quite average but what really I disliked was that some of the moments in the movie felt so cringeworthy or corny. Also Marrion (sorry I dunno correct spelling) felt like from 21st century not from whatever century it was meant there. And the dialogue was often a bit dumb and even though I like Taron Egerton, I found his acting with smirks and stuff here a bit like corny. Overall watchable but my expectations for Robin Hood movie werent met
Report
no no no... huge misteake.. do not waste your time... please do not do it this ;)
Report
A new Robin Hood Movie. I wanted to give the Film a fair chance but there isn't much you can like about the Movie. The Story is nothing new and everybody basically knows it already. The cast has some Talented actors but they cannot use there potential. There is of course a Love Triangle. Romantic in the most cringiest boring and dumbest way possible. And there is no real chemistry between the Characters. The scenes between the Action set pieces are pretty boring ,but if seen worse. The only thing i liked are some of the Action Scenes and the bow Skill Of Taron Egerton. But its better to watch the Training clipes than the Movie. The Editing is also awkward. It uses fast camera movement and Slow-mo but just does not fell right. The overall Setting would be interesting if it wouldnt be a Robin hood movie, it just does not fit for the Character. The Film kind of fells it wants to be a Guy Ritchie Film without understanding how to use his Style Correct, and what make his Movies entertaining and re-watchable. I was bored for 80% of the whole Run-time. Its nothing more than an uncreative Blockbuster that has no own ideas and Takes every ideas from better Movies.
Report
Production Company
Summit Entertainment,
TIK Films,
Appian Way,
Safehouse Pictures,
Thunder Road Pictures,
French Tax Credit,
EMG Management,
Emperor Motion Pictures
Release Date Nov 21, 2018
Duration 1 h 56 m
Rating PG-13
Tagline The Legend You Know. The Story You Don't.
Awards
Razzie Awards
• 3 Nominations
Alliance of Women Film Journalists
• 1 Nomination
