Snake Eyes

Name: Snake Eyes
Genre: Mystery, Thriller, Crime
Released: August 7, 1998
Duration: 98 min
Rating: 52
Cast: Gary Sinise, Nicolas Cage

1998

METASCORE

Mixed or average reviews based on 24 Critic Reviews

See All

USER SCORE

Generally unfavorable reviews based on 122 Ratings

See All

2.1

VOTE NOW

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

2.1	Your Score
2.1	User Score Generally unfavorable reviews based on 122 Ratings

Would you like to write a review?

There is a 75 character minimum for reviews. If your review contains spoilers, please check the Spoiler box. Please do not use ALL CAPS. There is no linking or other HTML allowed. Your review may be edited for content. 0/5000

Check box if your review contains spoilers

Play Sound

Please enter your birth date to watch this video:

You are not allowed to view this material at this time.

Snake Eyes

Now Playing: Snake Eyes

Movie Details & Credits

Paramount Pictures | Release Date: August 7, 1998 | R

Starring: Gary Sinise, Nicolas Cage

Summary: Rick Santoro (Cage), a flamboyant Atlantic City police detective, comes to watch the fight and cash in on the hectic betting action. Suddenly, gunfire cuts down a ringside government official, and 14,000 fans suddenly become 14,000 suspects. What eyewitnesses saw, what a casino-wide spycam network reveals and what a mysterious woman inRick Santoro (Cage), a flamboyant Atlantic City police detective, comes to watch the fight and cash in on the hectic betting action. Suddenly, gunfire cuts down a ringside government official, and 14,000 fans suddenly become 14,000 suspects. What eyewitnesses saw, what a casino-wide spycam network reveals and what a mysterious woman in white knows--all lead to a shattering truth Santoro does not want to believe. (Paramount)

… Expand

Director: Brian De Palma

Genre(s): Mystery, Thriller, Crime

Rating: R

Runtime: 98 min

See All Details and Credits

Watch Now

Buy on

Stream On

Expand

Metascore

Positive:

Mixed:

Negative:

Critic Reviews

Dallas Observer Peter Rainer

The entire film takes its cue from Cage's spritzes and jags; it's a delirious performance in a delirious landscape. Read full review

Andy Seiler

Snake Eyes sports some of the most breathtaking filmmaking of De Palma's career -- and Nicolas Cage is the one actor who cannot be upstaged by it. [18 September 1998, p. 11E]

James Berardinelli

Mixed together, all of this makes for a fascinating viewing experience, but the unfortunate ending diluted my enthusiasm for the film as a whole. Read full review

Tom Meek

Cage and Sinise earn their pay, but the story by De Palma and David Koepp -- which strains for romantic glory of De Palma's "Blow Out" or "Obsession" -- gives away too much too early. Read full review

Todd McCarthy

Cage supplies beaucoup energy, but his highly compromised hustler cop character provides little else in which he can invest his talent. Sinise wears an increasingly grim demeanor in a part that comes to make no sense, and John Heard's role as a local power broker gets lost in the shuffle. Read full review

TV Guide Magazine Maitland McDonagh

The identity of the bad guy is ludicrously obvious; and his public unmasking relies on the dopiest contrivance in recent memory. Read full review

Bob Graham

De Palma seems to be trying too hard to make somebody else's great movie, once again an Alfred Hitchcock movie. Would someone please tell this guy to relax? Read full review

SEE ALL 24 REVIEWS

Write a Review

User Reviews

Tss5078

Feb 24, 2013

This is your classic, who done it, murder mystery by the modern day master of suspense, Brian De Palma. A lot of other people who reviewed this movie didn't like it, because it moves slowly and then shows a lot of flashbacks of the crime through many different witnesses eyes, similar to theThis is your classic, who done it, murder mystery by the modern day master of suspense, Brian De Palma. A lot of other people who reviewed this movie didn't like it, because it moves slowly and then shows a lot of flashbacks of the crime through many different witnesses eyes, similar to the TV show Cold Case. Personally, I think this just adds to the suspense and helps build to an expected climax, which had unexpected results for everyone involved. Nicholas Cage plays Rick Santoro perfectly, its a role that at the time seemed as thou it could be a bit of a stretch for him, but as always he is terrific. This film is defiantly a throwback, that many people didn't seem to go for, but I think it's something different and well worth seeing.… Expand

3 of 4 users found this helpful31

TarintinoCodFan

Feb 15, 2012

Spectacular performance from Nicholas Cage. This film was a real treat and a hidden gem. I thoroughly enjoyed each layer of the story unfolding. Great film.

3 of 4 users found this helpful31

Spangle

Oct 2, 2016

I would like to motion for a critical reappraisal of Brian De Palma's absolutely terrific Snake Eyes. Terrifically thrilling, Snake Eyes features Nicolas Cage as Richard Santoro, a charismatic and corrupt Atlantic City police detective who witnesses an assassination during a boxing match.I would like to motion for a critical reappraisal of Brian De Palma's absolutely terrific Snake Eyes. Terrifically thrilling, Snake Eyes features Nicolas Cage as Richard Santoro, a charismatic and corrupt Atlantic City police detective who witnesses an assassination during a boxing match. Supported by a strong supporting performance from Gary Sinise as Commander Kevin Dunne, Snake Eyes is a spellbinding conspiracy thriller that is terrific to the very last drop.

Featuring all of De Palma's major trademarks, Snake Eyes is a showcase for his lovely camera work. The tracking shot at the very beginning of Richard Santoro walking through the arena is terrific, but what makes it all the much better is De Palma's repeated use of split-screen later on in the film that showcases how perception changes everything. For Santoro, he believed he knew what had occurred during the shooting. He thought he knew the players. It was only through speaking to Julia Costello (Carla Gugino) and Lincoln Tyler (Stan Shaw) that his eyes were opened. De Palma does a terrific job of using the split-screen to showcase the different perspectives a situation can have and how that can lead to false conclusions if you do not have both takes on a situation.

The camera work also comes into play when Julia is going up to a man's room and the camera pans through an aerial shot of the rooms on the floor. While it may not add much to the overall film, it was incredibly stylish and highlighted a very important element to the story: it was not about the assassination. In every room, people were either celebrating something completely unrelated or changing the channel from the news. For De Palma, this essentially serves to refocus the audience on what actually matters: the characters. Having read the critical reception, I was particularly struck by a quote from De Palma himself in which he stated, "There's a lot of discussion in Snake Eyes about why do we reveal who did it so soon. Well the problem is that it isn't about who did it. It's a mystery about a relationship, two people, and how finding that out affects their relationship... Those kind of procedural movies are extremely boring..." In essence, for me, many critics wind up missing the point of the film. While I loved it a conspiracy thriller and thought it was thoroughly captivating in this regard, De Palma's aim was to showcase the fracturing of the friendship between Santoro and Dunne when Santoro finds out the truth about his long time friend. Thus, the sequence in which he shows everyone ignoring the news of the assassination, it becomes clear that De Palma is trying to nudge the audience away from the murder mystery aspect and onto the character study.

As a character study, the film is equally riveting. Richard Santoro's reaction to the news, as relayed to him by Julia Costello who was revealing the conspiracy to the assassinated Secretary of Defense when the killing happened, is perfection. Cage brings the emotions to life and wears them on his sleeve in this sequence as you can see Santoro's heartbreak and, at first, deny that this is what occurred. His dedication to his friend is being tested, but he knows that it is true. When he finds video evidence confirming what she had told him was true, his heartbreak over losing his childhood friend is shattering and tremendous cinema. This is truly where the writing from David Koepp excels, as he manages to develop his characters so well, while also subtly keeping them within their characters even if its seems out-of-character, if that makes sense. For Santoro, he is established as being an adulterer and a corrupt cop. Yet, he wants to be mayor, which is why he wants to solve this case. For him, he may put on a facade of being charismatic and magnanimous, but deep down, he wants more than his current lot in life. For Kevin Dunne, he may seem like the "goody two shoes", but instead he is ruthless and manipulative, willing to do anything to get ahead. These characters truly come to life thanks to the writing from Koepp.

Another element captured incredibly well by De Palma is the chaos. This element is really put on display during the assassination, which is a chaotic, thrilling, and hectic sequence that is equally hectically shot. You can hardly tell what is going on and can feel your own heart beating as this sequence unfolds. This feeling is sustained throughout the film, in large part due to the free flowing camera of De Palma. It truly captures the significant amount of moving parts within the film and the chaos, as the long tracking shots emphasize. In particular, the opening tracking shot involves numerous different moments that could be a scene all on their own. Santoro runs into many different people and the camera struggles to keep up with him.… Expand

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

nejore

Jan 4, 2020

The film has its problems, but there are enough good moments and scenes to warrant a watch.

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

RichardSayre

Sep 30, 2021

SNAKE EYES: G.I. JOE ORIGINS is a middle of the road action flick with passable fight choreography and a fun martial arts story. Henry Golding is the obvious stand out here and without him the movie falls flat. The little sprinkles of G.I. Joe lore in the second half are nice treats for fansSNAKE EYES: G.I. JOE ORIGINS is a middle of the road action flick with passable fight choreography and a fun martial arts story. Henry Golding is the obvious stand out here and without him the movie falls flat. The little sprinkles of G.I. Joe lore in the second half are nice treats for fans of the series and gives one hope that maybe, just maybe, this franchise can be given a movie that is actually good.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

timone

Nov 9, 2018

Snake Eyes! Even though my brother Daniel saw a person who is from Transformers in this piece of sxxt! The opening is boring, but I do like the sound effects and the part where Nicolas Cage says " To give you a b£££r". It's just a boring boring film.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

OriginalDanger

Sep 7, 2020

Snake Eyes is a 1998 thriller and type of a mystery film... Snake Eyes is a Brian De Palma film which is concerning because in my own basic opinion Brian De Palma is a fairly good film maker and even though he's no Stanley Kubrick or David Lynch he's still great at what he does and that'sSnake Eyes is a 1998 thriller and type of a mystery film... Snake Eyes is a Brian De Palma film which is concerning because in my own basic opinion Brian De Palma is a fairly good film maker and even though he's no Stanley Kubrick or David Lynch he's still great at what he does and that's make good films however Snake Eyes is not one of them. Not seen Snake Eyes for years but I remember something about a boxing match and somebody getting shot or something silly and from then on Nicolas Cage bores us with his horrible acting and the story is poor aswell. Gary Sinise also stars but he doesn't make the film better and wipe Nicolas Cages bad acting clean and save Snake Eyes which is full of horrible, dull, depressing and bad moments. Snake Eyes isn't very impressive and it's quite boring if I'm honest and any violence in the film doesn't make it anymore exciting. Terrible movie.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

SEE ALL 8 REVIEWS

100	#100 Best Movie of 1998
62	#62 Most Discussed Movie of 1998
98	#98 Most Shared Movie of 1998