Warner Bros. | Release Date: March 4, 2022
7.5
USER SCORE
Generally favorable reviews based on 2533 Ratings
USER RATING DISTRIBUTION
Positive:
1,869
Mixed:
275
Negative:
389
Watch Now
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Expand
Review this movie
VOTE NOW
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Check box if your review contains spoilers 0 characters (5000 max)
4
PatvanoMar 4, 2022
I wanted to like this. They decided to make a movie about Batman, and take out anything fun about the character. His car is cool, but barely shown. Bruce Wayne is not fun. Alfred is not fun. The movie is too long. The Riddler is not a greatI wanted to like this. They decided to make a movie about Batman, and take out anything fun about the character. His car is cool, but barely shown. Bruce Wayne is not fun. Alfred is not fun. The movie is too long. The Riddler is not a great villian. Catwoman is pretty but they also use her to make racist comments against white people. I love Batman and wanted this to be good!! Expand
16 of 24 users found this helpful168
All this user's reviews
4
RuegrongMar 7, 2022
Do not believe the hype for this movie. There are so many mistakes in this movie along with a side plot that makes this movie an hour longer than the movie needed to be. The character are literally stupid, even the villain calls the out onDo not believe the hype for this movie. There are so many mistakes in this movie along with a side plot that makes this movie an hour longer than the movie needed to be. The character are literally stupid, even the villain calls the out on it. The first half of the movie seems like a good detective story and keeps you interested. It all goes downhill after the car chase scene. The cat woman gets her backstory filled which takes away from bruce wayne public character being developed. There are so many mistakes that make no sense, such as him opening parachute before going into a bridge and ping - pong off of traffic. This batman is not intelligent at all. The penguin is the best part of the movie Expand
27 of 84 users found this helpful2757
All this user's reviews
5
garyw_81Mar 6, 2022
I'm sorry but this movie is distinctly average, one of the poorest batman films to date. Th guy playing the riddler overacts in every scene(and not in the good way).The plot is laboured and boring. Pattinson is as poor a batman as you expect,I'm sorry but this movie is distinctly average, one of the poorest batman films to date. Th guy playing the riddler overacts in every scene(and not in the good way).The plot is laboured and boring. Pattinson is as poor a batman as you expect, playing an angsty teen rather than Bruce Wayne. I'm not sur who's giving this high ratings but I legit almost fell asleep during this movie. Expand
25 of 82 users found this helpful2557
All this user's reviews
5
CalvinCrackMar 4, 2022
Not so good. Boring. Has some good scenes but the story never gets exciting.
27 of 89 users found this helpful2762
All this user's reviews
6
AliasAndrewMay 17, 2022
Overrated film. It's dark and grounded but not inspiring and not fun at all. Lets not forget it's a superhero movie. The action scenes are way too few and boring. Yes, film noir yadda yadda but the detective is kind of dumb and he barelyOverrated film. It's dark and grounded but not inspiring and not fun at all. Lets not forget it's a superhero movie. The action scenes are way too few and boring. Yes, film noir yadda yadda but the detective is kind of dumb and he barely knows how to fight. It's overlong, the story is nothing to write home about, the chemistry between the characters not that great (especially with catwoman). The most emo, dumb, wimpy Batman of them all.

As a Batman movie it only surpasses the Joel Schumacher ones. I don't think I'll be seeing the sequel.
Expand
3 of 3 users found this helpful30
All this user's reviews
5
ComandanteCobraMay 18, 2022
It didn't do much for me.
Slow, too long, too dark (I mean lighting not story), a little derivated, some major changes in notoriuos DC characters (story, personality and motivation), some dialogues (important ones, like riddles) are difficult
It didn't do much for me.
Slow, too long, too dark (I mean lighting not story), a little derivated, some major changes in notoriuos DC characters (story, personality and motivation), some dialogues (important ones, like riddles) are difficult to translate and adapt properly in other languages. I dind't understand all the praise or all the hate; It is just plain.
Pattison, Wright and Dano do a good Job
Expand
2 of 2 users found this helpful20
All this user's reviews
6
calum769Jun 25, 2022
This was just an ok movie. Well, I was left feeling somewhat underwhelmed. I’m just not sure what this movie is trying to be. They tried something a little different but it just didn’t quite work for me. The riddler was a bit naff & I’m notThis was just an ok movie. Well, I was left feeling somewhat underwhelmed. I’m just not sure what this movie is trying to be. They tried something a little different but it just didn’t quite work for me. The riddler was a bit naff & I’m not sure the movie brought anything new to the table. Just left with a flat feeling at the end of it. Expand
1 of 1 users found this helpful10
All this user's reviews
5
nkukJun 2, 2022
I found this movie really boring. It's all been done before, the darkness, muted colour scheme and mumbled dialog didn't do anything positive in my view. The story and film started off really well but after the first act started to drag andI found this movie really boring. It's all been done before, the darkness, muted colour scheme and mumbled dialog didn't do anything positive in my view. The story and film started off really well but after the first act started to drag and get more and more boring. They could have cut an hour from the film and not lost anything of value. It dragged on too slowly, the plot was obvious and the characters have been played better in the past. Expand
1 of 1 users found this helpful10
All this user's reviews
5
dermacAug 26, 2022
I'd give two more if it wasn't for the racism. Ridiculous that we have to endure that in 2022
1 of 1 users found this helpful10
All this user's reviews
5
Fatbob15Oct 21, 2022
This movie is very overrated, the plot makes no sense, the villain is dull, the acting is dull, and it is way too long
1 of 1 users found this helpful10
All this user's reviews
6
KazieJun 23, 2022
This is a weird movie to rate. It has some stunning moments, some pretty compelling acting, great filmography mixed with some pretty confusing and lost performances and a meandering story that tries to do too much and ends up notThis is a weird movie to rate. It has some stunning moments, some pretty compelling acting, great filmography mixed with some pretty confusing and lost performances and a meandering story that tries to do too much and ends up not accomplishing a whole lot.

It is worth a watch for the action, but it is not some great work of film.
Expand
1 of 1 users found this helpful10
All this user's reviews
5
piglordofallhamMay 11, 2022
They really need to get the bots off this site. The new Batman is clumsy, bizarre, uneven, thinks its a totally different genre, and has some of the lamest action sequences that I didn't even know were possible to have in a movie aboutThey really need to get the bots off this site. The new Batman is clumsy, bizarre, uneven, thinks its a totally different genre, and has some of the lamest action sequences that I didn't even know were possible to have in a movie about freaking Batman. Robert Pattinson plays, "some guy larping as Batman," and legit doesn't look or carry the weight or the part of the comic book character and is so gratingly thick throughout the movie you might think he's one of those paper-thin C list superheroes instead. Casting is a joke, with a strange sequence at the beginning involving a gang of "thugs" or mini-future-joker enthusiasts perhaps?

They restrain a clearly asian man, to ironically ask the only black kid in the group to "knock him out" as some sort of rite of passage. I mean they could just take his darn wallet, but they've really got to prove a point I suppose. Are people in hollywood even remotely aware of the violence from the last 3 years directed towards Asian people by actual black perpetrators? How alarmingly out-of-touch.
So the kid chickens out, Batman shows up, with the leader of the gang somehow unaware of who Batman even is even though the opening crawl dialogue tells us he's been "watching the streets" for a couple of years. This whole gang doesn't know who Batman is or has never heard of him? Even after the montage of various other minor crime examples all cower as soon as they look at their own shadow under the vague light of the Bat signal? They all seem to know Batman. What ensues is one of the worst fight scenes I've ever seen in a film, and yes- I've seen Turkish Star Wars among many other films.

Pattinson almost drunkenly stands in the middle of these seven or eight dudes and gets wailed on several times, but then somehow bumps a few of them in such an uncomfortable fashion that they turn tail and flee. One dude literally pulls out a gun and takes aim, but the other thug who didn't want to commit violence tries to stop him. The bullets magically ricochet off Batman! Must be a new super power he picked up from a better Batman movie.

They then all scatter, and we get an extremely drawn out scene where Batman walks through a throng of police people at a murder scene with some black guy who isn't Lucius Fox I guess again larping as James Gordon. This is about as far as I could possibly get in the movie without falling asleep or killing myself, so honestly I don't care what happens beyond that point. The opening Riddler reveal scene is so goofy, that I almost peed my pants. Its legitmately one of the worst villain reveal scenes I've ever seen in a movie and its played one hundred percent straight.

Not recommended to anyone with half a brain or fans of the DC comics or even the Nolan films. Its so low effort and Pattinson and Kravitz are just not suited for these roles whatsoever.
Expand
4 of 5 users found this helpful41
All this user's reviews
4
Msmith1475Mar 23, 2022
Didn’t think I’d ever see a worse riddler than Jim Carey’s awful version, but Paul Dani’s(a great actor) is not the riddler. Call him Cling Wrap or crazy Cling wrap, but don’t call him riddler!
4 of 5 users found this helpful41
All this user's reviews
5
jessicalisonMay 11, 2022
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Great cinematography. Weak underdeveloped plot full of plot holes despite the long running time. Bad, open mouth acting from Batman and Riddler. Too many forced romance scenes between Batman and Catwoman. Inconsistent Batman who is sometimes bulletproof and sometimes not. Says he is the shadows but walks right into conflicts--common thugs happy to challenge him. Paper thin characters: Alfred, Gordon, the Riddler's victims, the reporter killed by Falcone. Endless fakeouts. Batman is shot/blown up! Oh no he's fine. Alfred is dead! Oh no he's not. Batman is going to run over Penguin! Oh no he's not. Catwoman shot Falcone! No she didn't. Riddler knows Batman's secret identity! No he does not. The major was shot! She's just fine. And many more too depressing to recount. Expand
3 of 4 users found this helpful31
All this user's reviews
4
NeelyryMar 11, 2022
Really wish Batman took his helmet off and slapped Catwoman upside the head for calling Bruce Wayne a white privileged guy that does nothing for Gotham. This movie was so so dark, whining about woke nonsense did not fit the bill at all.
6 of 9 users found this helpful63
All this user's reviews
5
VulcanMar 17, 2022
This has to be one of the most over-rated Batman movies about. It tries very hard to be "The Dark Knight" but comes up woefully short. Very minor spoilers ahead. Nothing about the story itself.

1) Batman comes across as just a regular shmo
This has to be one of the most over-rated Batman movies about. It tries very hard to be "The Dark Knight" but comes up woefully short. Very minor spoilers ahead. Nothing about the story itself.

1) Batman comes across as just a regular shmo running around in a cape. No cool James Bond style, he seems almost .. fragile. And this isnt a rap on the choice of actor - he actually is pretty good (no Christian Bale, but hes arguably as good as Ben Affleck), but the dialog in parts comes across a bit whiny and Batman doesn't come across being as intimidating as the other movies because of it.
2) The story is way to long and gets a bit dull at times. I mean sure it builds up a story but it takes way long to do so. Halfway in I found my attention wandering, which doesn't happen at other long movies like Avengers:Endgame e.g.
3) The villain and plot development isnt bad, but it feels more like a serial killer movie than a Batman movie. Some of the backstory about his family has an interesting twist, and the noir feel reminds me a bit of John Wick but it doesn't come together as well as that one (Batman is neither cool enough nor intimidating enough)

So all in all ... underwhelming.
Expand
6 of 9 users found this helpful63
All this user's reviews
4
yzbeastApr 13, 2022
Makes me miss the last three films. The main actor just didn’t seem to make the cut in this one.
6 of 9 users found this helpful63
All this user's reviews
5
RobobobMay 8, 2022
Things I liked: The Cast: Andy Serkis is awesome in everything he does, Patterson did a great job, Jeffery Wright is the next generation's Morgan Freeman. I really like Zoe Kravitz in most things she does but she seemed kind of ... 'off' inThings I liked: The Cast: Andy Serkis is awesome in everything he does, Patterson did a great job, Jeffery Wright is the next generation's Morgan Freeman. I really like Zoe Kravitz in most things she does but she seemed kind of ... 'off' in this one. In fact the whole Batman-Catwoman romance didn't work for me. He acts all stoic, she throws some half-azzed flirtations his way and I guess that's supposed to be a romance of sorts? Colin Farrel deserves an Oscar for his performance has the Penguin. If people weren't told who was playing Cobblepot ahead of time they never would have guessed it. Paul Dano was a little...eh... much. I could have done with a little toning down of the Riddler without the PG-13 Seven wannabe.
The action was top notch and some of the best of any batman movie.
So why the score? Three major issues bring big negatives in my book: the cinematography is some of the worst I've ever seen in any movie. As dark and unrecognizable as Solo or some eps of the last season of GoT. I had to turn my brightness to max on my TV just to see what was happening in this movie. If Solo gets a knock for it, so should this movie.
The second big negative is the musical score. The entire soundtrack is a riff of the same 4 notes used over... and over.. and over again and it gets old very quick in a 3 hour movie and that brings me the third big negative:
The length. There is no way this movie needed to be 3 hours. After hearing about "Saving Gotham" with a brooding Batman for 2 hours.. I was done and tuning out for the last hour.
My next big point: this is the third Batman in 10 years. They've introduced the fourth Joker in 15 years. Why is WB so afraid of making a BM movie without even a mention of the Joker? Can we get some new villains up in here? Black Mask, Hush, Clayface, anyone that hasn't been on the big screen before? Maybe someone a little more comic-booky like Man-bat,instead of these gangsters and psychopaths, Can we quit trying to push Batman as the darkest superhero, who doesn't kill mind you, while treading the PG-13 line? I just need something new and refreshing and different in a Batman movie and this was just a harder attempt at a Batman-Nolan movie.
Expand
2 of 3 users found this helpful21
All this user's reviews
4
MaxPayneIsGodApr 18, 2022
Overly long and dark for the sake of being dark.
Pattinson's Batman is far, far better than his angst ridden, sullen, sulky, emo, Wayne.
Kravitz is great, Farrell is phenomenal and it was a travesty he didn't get more screen time. Dano's
Overly long and dark for the sake of being dark.
Pattinson's Batman is far, far better than his angst ridden, sullen, sulky, emo, Wayne.
Kravitz is great, Farrell is phenomenal and it was a travesty he didn't get more screen time. Dano's take on the Riddler was a bit much, its like there is middle ground between Carrey and Dano, and well, they missed it by turning him into a masked loon, think Michael Meyers with a larger vocabulary.
Serkis' Alfred is almost non-existent and the side story about Catwoman is an utter waste of time.
The score is a high point.
The reality is this story could have been told in 90 minutes to 2 hours max. Its over-inflated run time is arrogant and self indulgent.
Don't get me wrong, I had very low expectations for The Batman and it was far, far better than I thought it would be, but this sums it up:
It ain't no "Dark Knight Trilogy"
Expand
7 of 11 users found this helpful74
All this user's reviews
5
viroodiemApr 18, 2022
Unimpressive.

Patman is the worst performance of Batman in live action film since Clooney. That is the crux of the problems with the film, Terrible casting. With the exception of Andy Serkis and Paul Dano this was the most poorly cast batman
Unimpressive.

Patman is the worst performance of Batman in live action film since Clooney. That is the crux of the problems with the film, Terrible casting. With the exception of Andy Serkis and Paul Dano this was the most poorly cast batman film from top to bottom.

Other problems exist such as there being no chemistry with the cast. Pattinson and Kravitz are like watching paint dry.

The music is also a highlight in terrible. Between repeatedly beating "Something In The Way" and Ava Marie in their various rearrangements, the music is uninspired and downright bland.

There is also the writing which is more or less OK, but the pacing of it is too long, drawn out and aimlessly meandering.

Arguably the worst part of all of this is the public told you this from the beginning. Anyone who understands film making told you that this was going to be bad. Its not as bad as it could have been but it definitely is not up to the legacy of the franchise and remember this is the same franchise with batnips and Ahnold.

It took me 6 hours to get through a laborious 3 hour film from stopping it and getting bored repeatedly. A hallmark of a mediocre film

5/10. Its bad but you have undoubtedly seen worse. At least it isnt some Disney garbage.
Expand
5 of 8 users found this helpful53
All this user's reviews
6
Por64Mar 21, 2022
Bat emo. I mean I'm honestly that's all I want to say about the movie but I don't know I guess I'll talk about Catwoman honestly I still prefer Tim Burton's Catwoman from Batman returns better
5 of 8 users found this helpful53
All this user's reviews
6
harveman877Mar 20, 2022
A pretty mediocre Batman movie overall. Robert Pattison was a pretty decent choice for Batman/Bruce Wayne overall I can't fault the movie on his performance. It was interesting to see an amateurish Batman struggle as he was at the beginningA pretty mediocre Batman movie overall. Robert Pattison was a pretty decent choice for Batman/Bruce Wayne overall I can't fault the movie on his performance. It was interesting to see an amateurish Batman struggle as he was at the beginning still learning. Despite this the villain cast is kind of weak. Yet again they just turn the main villain Riddler into a bad Joker clone. Colin Farrell was an acceptable Penguin, but really just the side villain here still growing in the Gotham underworld. There are some good action scenes, but overall the main plot is too drawn out and it becomes a bit boring at times as this movie is definitely too long and not enough to fill in the gaps. Of the supporting cast the Jim Gordon selection was good, but Catwoman was so-so at best. She played a pivotal part, but the actress who played her was just kind of meh. Overall this is decent but still nowhere near Christopher Nolan's trilogy. Expand
3 of 5 users found this helpful32
All this user's reviews
6
XxxtentaclesMar 11, 2022
One of the best Batman movie I’ve ever watched, Pattison played the best Batman’s I’ve ever seen but unfortunately he was a terrible Bruce Wayne :(
3 of 5 users found this helpful32
All this user's reviews
4
Nobilis1984Mar 5, 2022
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Actually it should be a good movie. But I just don't feel this.
Starting with the fact that it is too long and has many lengths and that the dialogues are to fall asleep, it is not convincing over the entire length.
The cast is good except that Catwoman is a miscast.
The action is well staged but dulls because you always see the same thing.
Considering all the qualities of the Batman movies as a whole, this one is no more entertaining than the Joel Schumacher parts. Are ok, but far from the great films of a Nolan or Burton.
Expand
10 of 17 users found this helpful107
All this user's reviews
6
arrivistMar 4, 2022
It's good, not great. Certainly not a masterpiece. There's definite room for improvement in the sequel. I think the film would have benefited with being an R rating, the PG-13 watered the action down too much. I was glad to get my money'sIt's good, not great. Certainly not a masterpiece. There's definite room for improvement in the sequel. I think the film would have benefited with being an R rating, the PG-13 watered the action down too much. I was glad to get my money's worth with 3-hours run-time, but it felt too long overall and the film dragged in parts. All the actors were excellent, but the star was the unrecognisable Collin Farrell as the Penguin. Bonus points for a great car chase and fight in a nightclub. Shame it was shot digitally. There was also a collective audible groan in the screening following the line 'white male privilege.' Expand
7 of 12 users found this helpful75
All this user's reviews
5
WillarApr 18, 2022
Overall I enjoyed Batman's character arc, however, I found the rest of the film a little dull and overly long. At times it feels like it is trying to imitate other thrillers such as Seven and Zodiac but it never quite succeeds in matching theOverall I enjoyed Batman's character arc, however, I found the rest of the film a little dull and overly long. At times it feels like it is trying to imitate other thrillers such as Seven and Zodiac but it never quite succeeds in matching the tone and suspense of better movies. Expand
6 of 11 users found this helpful65
All this user's reviews
6
jcrusanMar 6, 2022
The visuals in this movie are excellent, the mood is reminiscent of Se7en, and some scenes are memorable. In the end though, it seems like a movie that was created backwards. They knew the scenes that would be visually effective, but didn'tThe visuals in this movie are excellent, the mood is reminiscent of Se7en, and some scenes are memorable. In the end though, it seems like a movie that was created backwards. They knew the scenes that would be visually effective, but didn't know where to put them. The story was an afterthought in a movie overly long, poorly edited, and lacking actual riddles Expand
8 of 16 users found this helpful88
All this user's reviews
5
chadimusMar 7, 2022
Entertaining up to a point but after the car chase scene, which is at the half way point, it drag and drags. The ending(s) in particular only help provide some relief in that this slog is almost over. Not even half the movie any of theEntertaining up to a point but after the car chase scene, which is at the half way point, it drag and drags. The ending(s) in particular only help provide some relief in that this slog is almost over. Not even half the movie any of the Nolan flicks, including the last one. Expand
7 of 14 users found this helpful77
All this user's reviews
5
DodgerMar 13, 2022
Average to below Average movie.

It had an issue Indiana Jones has where Batman was unimportant to the story, he didn't actually achieve or do anything through the entire film. Also too long and irregular pacing. I don't know where all
Average to below Average movie.

It had an issue Indiana Jones has where Batman was unimportant to the story, he didn't actually achieve or do anything through the entire film.

Also too long and irregular pacing.

I don't know where all these 10/10 are coming from.
Expand
3 of 6 users found this helpful33
All this user's reviews
6
43in2014Mar 20, 2022
The short review: The film is too dark and depressing, has too many characters and a overly complex story. It was tiring to watch. Related media: This is a reimagining of the Batman story, so there is no relation to the earlier films.The short review: The film is too dark and depressing, has too many characters and a overly complex story. It was tiring to watch. Related media: This is a reimagining of the Batman story, so there is no relation to the earlier films. Synopsis: The story starts 2 years after Batman first appeared in the terribly corrupt and crime-ridden Gotham City. The Riddler starts killing and leaving riddles for Batman to solve, clues that reveal how corruption had permeated many institutions, including one that is close to the Batman.


Positive:


1) It was a relief that it didn't suck after all the rumours about a difficult production and a difficult Robert Pattinson.


2)Zoe Kravitz portraying Catwoman is the best part of the film.


Negatives:


1) The film was overly dark, lighting-wise and tone-wise. The Marvel Cinematic Universe films are so successful because you can see what is happening and they are also almost all fun to watch. I know this is a film about the Dark Knight, but you need to contrast the dark parts with the brighter parts to make the dark parts stand out more. Otherwise, the viewers are just going to be drained at the end of the film. The director may have this intention, but I had felt drained and frustrated. 2) At nearly 3 hrs long (including credits), the film is 1 hour too long. I had looked at my watch far too many times during the film, indicating that I was bored. The story is too complex, there are too many characters to follow and there are too many things happening. There is also one dead villain being repeatedly mentioned but there were no photo or video of him thus making it hard to follow the story. 3) Robert Pattinson gets to act out his emo goth but I did not enjoy watching him. This film has turned me off watching his other films because I think many of them have him acting out in the same way too.


How would the different age groups rate this:


Children: (not rated for children).


Teens: Good.


Young adults: Excellent.


Medium-age adults: Average. Old adults: Poor


My rating: 3/5 (no half scores). Only worth to catch it on TV.
Expand
3 of 6 users found this helpful33
All this user's reviews
5
SnowadianMar 11, 2022
Not a great movie. Crow and Seven were far superior and the very obvious inspiration for this version of Batman. The love is for the dark atmosphere and sullen Bruce Wayne, which was okay but needed an R rating to be effective. Riddler was noNot a great movie. Crow and Seven were far superior and the very obvious inspiration for this version of Batman. The love is for the dark atmosphere and sullen Bruce Wayne, which was okay but needed an R rating to be effective. Riddler was no where near as intelligent as the writers wanted him to be. His garbage bag uniform was poorly constructed and his character was totally undone in the third act. The penguin was an awful villain and only played a small role in what was an excellent car chase scene. Zoe was one of the best Cat Woman I've seen, she did a great job. Music was good, I enjoyed Batman's theme. Batman mingling with cops and the public upset me, it was such a detour of who his character is. As always these days, atmosphere and cool shots seem more important to directors than actual story. I have no interest in seeing a sequel. For sure this movie benefited from a long Covid lock down, people's excitement to get back to the movies overflowed into their general senses. Okay movie - not the Batman I'm looking for. Expand
3 of 6 users found this helpful33
All this user's reviews
4
CoonarosMar 17, 2022
The pace of this movie is really slow for no reason ! There could be some stories (catwoman) that can be entire get of the plot be the same something as a filler. I didnt like most of the acting expect of Collins Penguin.. It was a fantasticThe pace of this movie is really slow for no reason ! There could be some stories (catwoman) that can be entire get of the plot be the same something as a filler. I didnt like most of the acting expect of Collins Penguin.. It was a fantastic performance! and really good comix accurated ... I also liked Danos Riddler ! it was a fantastic performance ! The detective part was simple and the riddlers not something mind blowing to elevate the detective side of The batman! There are also trying to do the "realistic" batman something in my opinion i hated it ! (if you want to do it realistic the get rid of the cape ) . Gotham was fantastic i really liked the moody rainy gotham city all the trash etc etc and i really like the narative noir kind of film... I hope we have an improvement with the next movie with all the gadget and a batcave we really miss that part.. And pls more acrobatic! Expand
3 of 6 users found this helpful33
All this user's reviews
6
AcidCasualApr 16, 2022
Underwhelmed, if you’re going to go up against the colossal ‘Dark Knight’… you either go epic, or just change it so much that it becomes it’s own thing. It didn’t quite manage to get there, Pattison was dark, tormented, but also a bit boring.Underwhelmed, if you’re going to go up against the colossal ‘Dark Knight’… you either go epic, or just change it so much that it becomes it’s own thing. It didn’t quite manage to get there, Pattison was dark, tormented, but also a bit boring. He just didn’t have the character traits to be interesting. The acting overall by the cast was good. Just not amazing. Like a lot of big budget, well made films. They seem to have splashes of brilliance, but lose momentum. This film did just that.

Unlike Nolan’s masterpiece, it manages to keep pace and intrigue over a long period of time.

Worth the watch nevertheless.
Expand
3 of 6 users found this helpful33
All this user's reviews
6
FaxthtaxApr 18, 2022
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. This movie was so incredible dark and grim. Its almost like i would advise anyone with depression and dark thoughts to stay away..
This movie is stripped with over-the-top gadgetry where Batman uses more conventional tools. His Batmobile is just a souped up muscle car. Very stripped to the bone.
But the movie is more a noir-gothic detective flick (in colour) with just the right amount of action. Its like Sherlock Holmes in modern times where he dons a cape and a cowl.
They steal a great deal from Finchers Se7en. Especially from when they search The Riddlers apartment is ripped straight out of Se7en.
From there on out its all John Doe and Ledgers Joker motifs.
But the production value is top. Good performances from Pattinson and Wright. However, 3 hours is a tad bit to much. It drags plenty in the end.
But i dont think Batman can be taken more into darkness than this rendition..
Expand
2 of 4 users found this helpful22
All this user's reviews
4
TenderloinsMay 8, 2022
Really long, really boring and really orange. I miss sad batman, you know, Affleck, this batman is too emo and not sad at all.
1 of 2 users found this helpful11
All this user's reviews
6
realperson2018Apr 18, 2022
This latest Batman movie is Dark. When I say that I'm not being figurative. Yes. The story is dark but the movie itself is even darker. Virtually the entire movie occurs at night and there is hardly enough light to see what isThis latest Batman movie is Dark. When I say that I'm not being figurative. Yes. The story is dark but the movie itself is even darker. Virtually the entire movie occurs at night and there is hardly enough light to see what is happening... The movie is also very, very long. At three hours, it could use some judicious editing. This is especially true for the first half of the movie. It sets the tone for the movie and it does so emphatically and repeatedly--nearly endlessly. The real action and the meat of the movie does not really get going until the last one-third of the movie. That part of the movie is when the story starts to get interesting. It just takes way too long to get there. And it's so very dark it's hard to see what is actually happening. Expand
5 of 11 users found this helpful56
All this user's reviews
6
FoxMan250Mar 6, 2022
Interesting take on Batman. The villains were well portrayed and the focus on detective work was great, but I did not enjoy a tortured grungy Bruce Wayne as much as Affleck and Bale's version. The relationship with Catwoman was also a bitInteresting take on Batman. The villains were well portrayed and the focus on detective work was great, but I did not enjoy a tortured grungy Bruce Wayne as much as Affleck and Bale's version. The relationship with Catwoman was also a bit awkward and unnecessary. Expand
7 of 16 users found this helpful79
All this user's reviews
5
KlebartMar 9, 2022
I mean it's good, but not great. There's not much special about it. I guess third times the charm with CatWoman, but still not overly interesting. The last third of the movie could have probably been cut from the film. Gordon and PennyworthI mean it's good, but not great. There's not much special about it. I guess third times the charm with CatWoman, but still not overly interesting. The last third of the movie could have probably been cut from the film. Gordon and Pennyworth were the only ones who could act. Riddler did well, but they went in a different direction with him. It's the only movie at the theaters right now. It's an OK watch, but be prepared for a movie almost entirely filmed at night and/or the dark. I didn't expect anything ground-breaking so just take it for what it is. Expand
3 of 7 users found this helpful34
All this user's reviews
6
AceiceMar 7, 2022
Its one of the better movies made in recent years but of course it's not fateful to the source ,the cast is a mess and in my opinion everyone could pass as different characters from Gotham but played the wrong one and the stupid mistakes thatIts one of the better movies made in recent years but of course it's not fateful to the source ,the cast is a mess and in my opinion everyone could pass as different characters from Gotham but played the wrong one and the stupid mistakes that Bruce did that are not supposed to be made by"the greatest detective" I would've given it 7 because it was enjoyable in the end ,but after thinking about it for a little while I couldn't. Expand
3 of 7 users found this helpful34
All this user's reviews
6
MobolajiMar 6, 2022
Honestly, average movie. Has a lot of good good things like the riddler, and some few scenes. But the movie runs too long, and offers nothing new when compared with the previous Batmans. We really do not need another year 1/2 batman again.Honestly, average movie. Has a lot of good good things like the riddler, and some few scenes. But the movie runs too long, and offers nothing new when compared with the previous Batmans. We really do not need another year 1/2 batman again. This movie wasn't made for fans, it was made for the executives who wanted a quick profit. movie formula: realistic fighting, one car chase, say batman doesn't kill Expand
13 of 31 users found this helpful1318
All this user's reviews
5
DFury7Mar 7, 2022
A massive letdown...

I'm as big of a Batman fan as they come and I was beyond excited for this movie after several stunning trailers, I even liked the casting of Pattinson of Batman and wanted to see him prove all the doubters wrong...
A massive letdown...

I'm as big of a Batman fan as they come and I was beyond excited for this movie after several stunning trailers, I even liked the casting of Pattinson of Batman and wanted to see him prove all the doubters wrong...

First I'll say what I did like about the film:
-The score
-The cinematography
-Colin Ferell's unrecognizable performance
-The Batsuit and Batmobile
-Catwoman's portrayl

Now what I didn't like about this one:
-The snail like pacing
-Emo Bruce Wayne who doesn't separate his Batman persona from his regular life
-The lack of screen time and chemistry for Alfred
-The jumbled and disjointed plot that doesn't seem to know exactly where it's going
-Riddler's ultimate ploy at the end of the movie not aligning with his motivation from the rest of the film
-The lack of memorable action scenes - Some rather cringey/weak dialogue which I blame on the writers and not the stellar cast

While not an entirely a bad film, it simply left me with a feeling of "meh' which is not what I expect from a big budget lice action Batman reboot. A reboot has to feel necessary and this movie does nothing better than the Nolan film's already pulled off. I literally went home and rewatched Batman Begins after I left the theater just to remind myself of what a Batman movie should feel like.
Expand
9 of 22 users found this helpful913
All this user's reviews
5
SkydogMar 6, 2022
Not sure why people are giving this a 10. An hour of the movie is filler and should have been removed so half the theatre didn't fall asleep. And most of the dialogue was drag-material as well. I will however say that most of the acting wasNot sure why people are giving this a 10. An hour of the movie is filler and should have been removed so half the theatre didn't fall asleep. And most of the dialogue was drag-material as well. I will however say that most of the acting was quite good. Especially the Penguin and The Riddler. Expand
8 of 20 users found this helpful812
All this user's reviews
6
gracjanskiApr 18, 2022
The movie is too long. There are so many scenes, where the actors are moving so slowly and it is done in little slow motion. It is annoying sometimes. The movie is also political correct: many black men, Catwoman is shown unrealisticallyThe movie is too long. There are so many scenes, where the actors are moving so slowly and it is done in little slow motion. It is annoying sometimes. The movie is also political correct: many black men, Catwoman is shown unrealistically strong, Michelle Pfeifer was much better as Catwoman in my view and there was no fire between that Catwoman and Batman. The character Riddler was interesting, he had some good character traits, but he was shown too nerdy.
But there are some good things in the movie: The dark settings was nice, it is almost like a film noir, maybe even a bit too dark. The action scenes were also great. And the focus on the detective part of Batman was interesting, but somehow artificial and unrealistic, I prefered the first quarter of the movie.
Expand
4 of 10 users found this helpful46
All this user's reviews
5
GameloreMar 11, 2022
Pass on this movie unless you want it completely sucking the enthusiasm out of you. Performances are lifeless. It also marked a distinct return to the 80s style lack of attention to realism, leaving no "outs" to explaining so many thingsPass on this movie unless you want it completely sucking the enthusiasm out of you. Performances are lifeless. It also marked a distinct return to the 80s style lack of attention to realism, leaving no "outs" to explaining so many things that I lost count. Total reversal of realism from the last trilogy. Also, what was up with the disrespectful pacing? Editor thought he was making a soap opera or Netflix series. I watched "Drive My Car" with the same runtime, completely enthralled with almost nothing happening because editing was crisp and well-framed. The > 1 -hour of dead footage in The Batman was pointless. Expand
2 of 5 users found this helpful23
All this user's reviews
6
simonrs27Mar 7, 2022
En general está bien, pero Enigma me flojea bastante, y debería ser para mayores de 18 años porque las escenas de acción y de crimen se quedan un poco flojas siendo para mayores de 12 años, con lo oscura que es la película le habría pegado unEn general está bien, pero Enigma me flojea bastante, y debería ser para mayores de 18 años porque las escenas de acción y de crimen se quedan un poco flojas siendo para mayores de 12 años, con lo oscura que es la película le habría pegado un poco más de leña. Expand
2 of 5 users found this helpful23
All this user's reviews
6
Ramazan_119Mar 5, 2022
Way too long and underwhelming. It feels like it’s never going to end. Batman eats enough bullets to drop a tank. All side characters are just copies of each other. Very underwhelming movie with good premise and crime scenes (detective parts)
9 of 23 users found this helpful914
All this user's reviews
6
Miles_LongMar 5, 2022
Beautiful, but a little boring. I really wanted to like this since it's so artistically and tonally what I wanted out of the next chapter in the batman world. There simply is no BANG! POW! ZAM! to the story. Bruce was enveloped in being theBeautiful, but a little boring. I really wanted to like this since it's so artistically and tonally what I wanted out of the next chapter in the batman world. There simply is no BANG! POW! ZAM! to the story. Bruce was enveloped in being the Batman, why? I can speculate, but the movie never really showed me. Batman is on the riddler case, but the mystery never felt clever or suspenseful, it was bit confusing. I wanted more time with the riddler from the riddlers perspective. What made him into a ticking time bomb? I wanted to see his struggles; a game of cat and mouse.

Speaking of Catwoman, I could not have given a **** about that story. It detracted from the focus of the Riddler. However there is so many things they got right. Gotham, the suit, the casting, the mood, the claustrophobia, the corruption, the filth of the city. All exactly what I want in my Batman movie, but the story was Ehhhh...
Expand
10 of 26 users found this helpful1016
All this user's reviews
4
kirsten123Mar 12, 2022
Probably the most disappointing movie I've seen in recent memory. Not a bad film per se, in fact Pattinson makes a very good Batman. Just about everything else in the film was underwhelming however. Three very long hours!
8 of 21 users found this helpful813
All this user's reviews
5
djapeMar 5, 2022
I was hoping for a bit more and faster action also but didn’t really get much if it. Also, too long.
8 of 21 users found this helpful813
All this user's reviews
4
VicFerrariMar 4, 2022
The Batman is an empty, dreary slog. Pattison's performance is one note as both Bats and Wayne. Batman (in his 2nd year) has to be schooled by the Riddler that crime exists outside of street level thugs - when he follows the clues the corruptThe Batman is an empty, dreary slog. Pattison's performance is one note as both Bats and Wayne. Batman (in his 2nd year) has to be schooled by the Riddler that crime exists outside of street level thugs - when he follows the clues the corrupt are so obvious - some detective. Superficial attempts at realism fall flat - the more you try to take 2-dimensional characters seriously, the sillier they seem. Standard modern representation (white lead, supporting characters of colour) yet in a 3 hour runtime it fails to pass the Bechdel test. Contrived, tedious, dumb. Expand
7 of 19 users found this helpful712
All this user's reviews
4
BidoulouMar 7, 2022
It's a slow, boring and not original story. The visuals are dark, gloomy, and almost not readable in most places. The only good points are the actors interpretation of their roles. All the rest was not my cup of tea.
5 of 14 users found this helpful59
All this user's reviews
6
andrewsalgadoMar 4, 2022
A little too dry. No spectacle; nothing fun or incredible about it- just sort of dull. I wanted it to be bigger and more sensational but it was very talky. Reeves seemed not to know what to do with all these great raw materials. Pattison wasA little too dry. No spectacle; nothing fun or incredible about it- just sort of dull. I wanted it to be bigger and more sensational but it was very talky. Reeves seemed not to know what to do with all these great raw materials. Pattison was excellent as Batman; but weepy as BW. Catwoman didn’t really have much to do. It was okay. Too long Expand
6 of 17 users found this helpful611
All this user's reviews
6
Experiment626Mar 4, 2022
It was OK, but it was too long and bloated. Several of the subplots could have been cut. The ending kept dragging on and on. Needed a better editor. Wasn't a fan of this take on The Riddler. It works for Joker, but not so much in thisIt was OK, but it was too long and bloated. Several of the subplots could have been cut. The ending kept dragging on and on. Needed a better editor. Wasn't a fan of this take on The Riddler. It works for Joker, but not so much in this case. A couple of preachy moments here and there, but it didn't over power the movie. No chemistry between Pattinson and Kravitz. Was worth a watch, but I don't plan on a repeat viewing in the theater. Expand
6 of 17 users found this helpful611
All this user's reviews
5
kdevittMar 5, 2022
A distinctly average movie. Pattison is one of the worst pieces of casting in modern history. He has all the physicality of a pre pubescent boy - makes for a terrible Wayne, and as Batman it’s hard to believe it could ever possibly handleA distinctly average movie. Pattison is one of the worst pieces of casting in modern history. He has all the physicality of a pre pubescent boy - makes for a terrible Wayne, and as Batman it’s hard to believe it could ever possibly handle himself. Other than that, it just drags on and on. You could have shaved an hour off the runtime and it wouldn’t have suffered. Expand
5 of 15 users found this helpful510
All this user's reviews
6
ALISHIRANIApr 23, 2022
We saw some immature children like teen agers with very bad and unacceptable roles for the audience's mind as super villain. I wish the director did a little research on mental illness and did not show them so ridiculously and badly. TheyWe saw some immature children like teen agers with very bad and unacceptable roles for the audience's mind as super villain. I wish the director did a little research on mental illness and did not show them so ridiculously and badly. They were really bad, they were immature, as if riddler and the unseen character couldn't make any connection with their roles! Do you want an acceptable sample? Watch the Joker 2019, or the Nolan trilogy, or the Tim Burton trilogy, In the Batman 2022 i didn't see any challenging and breathtaking moments! Why should the dialogues be poetic in the sequence of the mayor's murder? Why is Batman in the middle of every where? Why does he talk so much? Why does Alfred look stupid? Why should the film be three hours when two hours are enough for these details? Batman, Cat Woman and Penguin, Those were just good! Expand
4 of 12 users found this helpful48
All this user's reviews
4
bonqMar 11, 2022
This movie is just meh. It's so long that it could end in 5 points. Some of the stuff doesn't make sense and makes batman look just dumb. He's a detective, but not a clever one. C'man he's been in business for over 2 years and that's a lot ofThis movie is just meh. It's so long that it could end in 5 points. Some of the stuff doesn't make sense and makes batman look just dumb. He's a detective, but not a clever one. C'man he's been in business for over 2 years and that's a lot of time. That is not year one or the beginning of his story! What is the point of Catwoman? Without her, it would make a story the same. She's awkward eye candy, with the message: White rich people are bad. The movie looks good and some scenes are pretty good, but they won't save the full movie. Actors did good jobs. At last, Batman should be IMO the sneaking creeping fear, a symbol of hope is Superman! Spoiler: Riddler is Bubbles from Trailer Parks Boys xD When you see it you can't unsee it :D Expand
2 of 6 users found this helpful24
All this user's reviews
6
ice05Mar 14, 2022
OVERALL it's fine! Good popcorn flick.
It is a little much how they are calling this a "masterpiece" but that marketing for you.
Rob did a great Batman but a dull uninteresting Bruce Wayne. Catwoman was well casted but as I feared her
OVERALL it's fine! Good popcorn flick.
It is a little much how they are calling this a "masterpiece" but that marketing for you.
Rob did a great Batman but a dull uninteresting Bruce Wayne. Catwoman was well casted but as I feared her character is nothing more than a forced plot device, that didn't bring anything exciting to the table. ( Impo I can't stand the romantic tension, that not Batman to me.). To sum it up... First half was pretty awesome! But as the movie kept going everything started to feel flat, and I wish Catwoman was written better or just cut from the movie as I feel it took too much focus away on more important/interesting story telling. Lol the Riddler was bitter sweet by the end and I think the Penguin ended up being the most rememberable character oddly enough.
Expand
1 of 3 users found this helpful12
All this user's reviews
6
TheKizeMar 11, 2022
Reeves presents a surprising number of compelling elements that ring true both on their own and in relation to the source material, but ultimately The Batman fails to combine those elements into a whole that competes with the most successfulReeves presents a surprising number of compelling elements that ring true both on their own and in relation to the source material, but ultimately The Batman fails to combine those elements into a whole that competes with the most successful adaptations of this beloved character. Expand
1 of 3 users found this helpful12
All this user's reviews
4
joalllucasMay 7, 2022
Esse Batman não é inteligente. Esse Batman não é ágil. Esse Batman não tem boas ferramentas. Ele é, literalmente, um rico numa capa. Em relação ao filme, o roteiro não é bom e a história se arrasta. Eu estava a cada 10 minutos vendo quandoEsse Batman não é inteligente. Esse Batman não é ágil. Esse Batman não tem boas ferramentas. Ele é, literalmente, um rico numa capa. Em relação ao filme, o roteiro não é bom e a história se arrasta. Eu estava a cada 10 minutos vendo quando tempo ainda faltava pra acabar. Pra completar, até a trilha sonora é ruim. Expand
1 of 3 users found this helpful12
All this user's reviews
6
najdd2Mar 13, 2022
best movie, i really liked batman he have a great character i hope it will be better and better in new versions
1 of 3 users found this helpful12
All this user's reviews
4
kmsteterMar 19, 2022
"Rata alada", sério? Nem a Marvel faria uma piada dessas... Nível adware de porno: "Achas que tens o necessário pra esmagar minha rata alada?"
1 of 3 users found this helpful12
All this user's reviews
6
zach_grechMay 10, 2022
This movie is pretty average. The start of the film is pretty great with excellent fight scenes and great character introductions. However the second act felt like a rehash of the first except less interesting. The final fight scene is alsoThis movie is pretty average. The start of the film is pretty great with excellent fight scenes and great character introductions. However the second act felt like a rehash of the first except less interesting. The final fight scene is also very boring. Cinematography is a highlight of the movie, it looks excellent. Expand
1 of 3 users found this helpful12
All this user's reviews
5
FerralkidApr 23, 2022
tHiS mOvIe iS NoT fOr kIdS tHiS iS a mOvIe fOr aDuLtS a MaTuRE cRImE ThRiLlEr.

The ultimate cope for Batman geeks, the most fragile and insecure fanbase on the planet. It's too derivative of David Fincher's work and it doesn't do anything
tHiS mOvIe iS NoT fOr kIdS tHiS iS a mOvIe fOr aDuLtS a MaTuRE cRImE ThRiLlEr.

The ultimate cope for Batman geeks, the most fragile and insecure fanbase on the planet. It's too derivative of David Fincher's work and it doesn't do anything the previous Batman movies haven't already done, well the Schumacher ones are excluded since his only contribution was a lot of neon.
The fans of The Batman are quite something else, they give the Nolan/Snyder cult a run for their money, when you point out that the movie is visually ugly and severely underlit, the only retort they have is "go watch Adam West and the Schumacher movies.".

To the people giving the Batman anything more than a 5/10, try watching something other than Star Wars and capesh*t.
Expand
8 of 26 users found this helpful818
All this user's reviews
4
EpicSurvivorApr 20, 2022
Boring as he11! Couldn't finish. Worst batman movie ever. All the new movies are garbage now
4 of 13 users found this helpful49
All this user's reviews
4
GronkarApr 19, 2022
Only thing they did right was the detective skills. This is Batman we talkin about, he suppose to go toe to toe with superman right? he was literally a punching bag. His stoic demeanor seemed really off. Like... you have a voice bruh, use it.Only thing they did right was the detective skills. This is Batman we talkin about, he suppose to go toe to toe with superman right? he was literally a punching bag. His stoic demeanor seemed really off. Like... you have a voice bruh, use it. I liked the overall story and the bad/good Catwoman, I feel like she should have been the star and batman a side character. Could have been worse but my goodness it should have been better. Expand
4 of 14 users found this helpful410
All this user's reviews
4
Taylor2057Mar 8, 2022
I didn't really want to go see it, my wife did and it was only because of twilight and I/we called it twilight batman. I seen the trailer and made my call, but she wanted to see it and hooked the kids, I paid over 90 dollars to sit there withI didn't really want to go see it, my wife did and it was only because of twilight and I/we called it twilight batman. I seen the trailer and made my call, but she wanted to see it and hooked the kids, I paid over 90 dollars to sit there with one kid a sleep, my wife leaving with the young one a hundred times, and I wouldn't put it past her that she took the little one into another movie for kids, because it wasn't what she hoped for. It was hyped because of the cast and nothing more, and it is seen here in the 10's. Praising it for its plot and great acting, and out of it all it was Kravitz that made what a slog it was and the jumbled mess of scenes running together so fast but not showing the timeframe it took place in. My old lady for what little she did watch called it a bad seven reboot, I can't say she is far off. The few high points were the trailer scenes at the beginning, about middle and the close end. It could've been an hr if that of run time and still told the story, but everything was drawn out and over acted or not acted at all in alot of the film, out of having the most bad guys in a super hero movie wasn't any of them a threat of had you going I hope its going to be ok, because you knew even when someone was going to die ahead of time. The music was pretty decent for the dark gritty take, the way it was shot was almost Tim Burton in a way with a modern city. It kept spinning wheels but no one character got much screen time for the thing being 3 hrs and that was the saddest of it all really, coming from Reeves who isn't the best director, but isn't bad either, and thats where this 200 plus million movie falls into, its not bad but its not good either, and I do feel ripped off and cheated because of the hype and higher price tag the tickets were. And to add at all the fan boys of pattison, even though Nolan isn't the director the Reeves is all his Batman movies made every scene count and that's why I'm saying this doesn't hold a candle to his version because he hit it on all accounts, even though he let Hardy make a mocking of Bane in some ways. Expand
4 of 14 users found this helpful410
All this user's reviews
4
RighterMar 9, 2022
The Batman is utter crap.

Incredibly mediocre in concept, plot, action, and performance. Blandly noir in style. At LEAST an hour longer than its plot merits on account of a red herring (a predictable red herring) that takes up the entire
The Batman is utter crap.

Incredibly mediocre in concept, plot, action, and performance. Blandly noir in style. At LEAST an hour longer than its plot merits on account of a red herring (a predictable red herring) that takes up the entire second act.

The soundtrack consists of mostly the two chords from Nirvana’s “Something in the Way”, and Bruce Wayne, in the few moments that the movie allows the character to exist at all, is tediously ‘emo’.

It’s crap.
Expand
2 of 7 users found this helpful25
All this user's reviews
6
MB_Mar 12, 2022
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. It was alright I guess.

Overly long, crap car chases, not as smart as it thinks it is so a bit slow and boring a lot of the time, but I didn't drift off once! The imagery is nice but all that was shown in the trailers. Music was meh, 4 notes and man cashes a cheque? Landed on your feet there Mike!

That said the performances were all great, Farrell was amazing, and the story was pretty good. Looked nice, although it looked like a tracing of a Nolan comic with some red splashed about to make it different-ish.

I'd say the run time was an issue. Hopefull in a sequel they will have the confidence to trim a little more fat.

A fair few plot holes; why is everyone going along the ground in a flood rather than up? There's multi-story buildings everywhere in the city, just go up two floors! Also the Riddler won, he killed everyone he wanted too and destroyed the city, it's Atlantis at the end, there's no way the subway system and everything above could be rescued, they would have to pump out the entire sea after they rebuilt the walls.

Final note, at the end Catwoman comes to the rescue after checking out, but we get shots of her both arriving at the stadium and inside the stadium so it's not a suprise when she helps, this is pretty basic stuff.
Expand
2 of 7 users found this helpful25
All this user's reviews
4
SxyboyteenApr 19, 2022
So sad that this new generation of audiences believe this movie was good. First I am going to say Patrick and Selina are fantastic actors. Patrick has to be one of the best Batmans and Selina was good, not great... just good. The directorSo sad that this new generation of audiences believe this movie was good. First I am going to say Patrick and Selina are fantastic actors. Patrick has to be one of the best Batmans and Selina was good, not great... just good. The director Matt Reeves, sucks. I'm sorry... He butchered the movie, "Let Me In." Which was a copy cat of a(n) original. And since the company wanted seriousness, well who better than Matt Reeves. The Batman character introduction is so stiff, he walks like he has pole up his bun. Also the rain... OMG it rains in almost every scene. I'm surprised a freaking flash flood warning didn't appear on Batman's cellphone. Penguin seems to have a difficult time with his acting... The Riddler is so Cringe... Also they are always whispering... There's no one on the freaking rooftop... Why are they whispering with pounding rain? The beginning of the movie started great all to go to hell once the fighting started... "MORE RAIN PLEASE!!!" If you're wondering there also fire in the rain, yep... gun fights in the rain... yep explosions in the rain. Batman walking in the rain... yep. If you love rain this is your movie. Cliche after cliche... It's such a bad movie. Drug factory, been there done that. Bodies in the back of a car... yep. Keep in mind we are living in a cancel culture and we are also living in a world where it's easy for people to put up a few sentences and say something is good. Watch the movie on a date night, just make sure to bring an umbrella... Freaking rain in every scene. Expand
2 of 7 users found this helpful25
All this user's reviews
6
Taylo226Apr 21, 2022
The over arching storyline was interesting and the Riddler did a good job of making a compelling villain. My issue lies with Robert Pattinson's Batman. I don't like the emo batman depiction. Unfortunately I have to compare this Batman movieThe over arching storyline was interesting and the Riddler did a good job of making a compelling villain. My issue lies with Robert Pattinson's Batman. I don't like the emo batman depiction. Unfortunately I have to compare this Batman movie to other good ones like Christopher Nolan's and it does not stack up well. If you can look past the emo batman you will probably enjoy it. Expand
2 of 7 users found this helpful25
All this user's reviews
4
ForzaE2Apr 20, 2022
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Alfred: I'll crack the riddles.
J. Gordon: I'll track down the bad guys.
Catwoman: I'll fight the bad guys.
Batman: I'll walk with an emo face in my house.
What do we call this movie?
The Batman
Me: Are you sure? I gave 4 for the cinematography. Please don't bring back Robert Pattinson.
Expand
2 of 7 users found this helpful25
All this user's reviews
4
MisterMcApr 22, 2022
No lie that's the worst batman(character) ever I c why the ratings is so low story wasn't all that either like he was so lame
2 of 7 users found this helpful25
All this user's reviews
5
edelgardvonhresMar 6, 2022
I was incredibly excited for Matt Reeves' take on Batman, being a fan of his work beforehand. Every trailer and photo I would see from set would make me more and more excited and finally the day came and as I sat through the nearly three hourI was incredibly excited for Matt Reeves' take on Batman, being a fan of his work beforehand. Every trailer and photo I would see from set would make me more and more excited and finally the day came and as I sat through the nearly three hour film, I was left...disappointed. Not because the movie was bad by any means, but because it didn't feel complete. There was no big resolution, there was no tense final standoff and battle of wits. It just...happened. And before I knew it, the film had ended. There was so much potential to be touched upon and I really thought we were finally going to have a Batman movie that could explore parts of Batman that had never been explored before on the big screen. Instead, we were left with an incredibly safe Batman movie that lays down tons of groundwork and definitely sets something up with it's diversity in characters, but other than that really just did not feel like it had a purpose to exist other than to sell merch and keep people interested in the future of DC by saying that SOMETHING may come eventually. I have to hand it to them, because the casting was wonderfully done and I fully appreciated the performances that Colin Farrell and Paul Dano put in as Penguin and Riddler respectfully, and Robert Pattinson shows promise as Batman. There was a lot of things to like here and a lot of things to hate, both culminating in a film with notable spectacles and great action scenes that were too few and far between for me to praise them enough. I really wanted to like this, but there were multiple moments that made me genuinely tired and bored, and even some that irked me, mostly the handling of Catwoman's ambiguous sexuality and her whole character motivation just being downright meaningless. The Batman could have been so much more than just another safe DC film, and it honestly felt like it was marketed as such. I'm hoping that this is just growing pains for the new DC movie lineup and that by the next entry things will be settled in, but for now I worry for what comes next. Expand
4 of 15 users found this helpful411
All this user's reviews
4
The_Man_With_NoApr 27, 2022
An honest opinion would tell you that this movie is average at best and mediocre at worst. There are good moments, however, they are far and few between in this near 3-hour slog. The Riddler is easily the worst part, he is nowhere near trueAn honest opinion would tell you that this movie is average at best and mediocre at worst. There are good moments, however, they are far and few between in this near 3-hour slog. The Riddler is easily the worst part, he is nowhere near true to his comic self, whatsoever. He weirdly moans and sexualizes his crimes, which, while accurate to certain serial killers, makes me feel like this movie was composed by cringey edgelords seeking a 12-17-year-old audience who can't sus out the fact that this movie has no substance. Anyone calling it a detective movie is doing a disservice to you. Batman never solves anything minus a simple riddle. The Riddler is always a step ahead despite him being so sloppy the audience can even recognize him. The Batman himself is so off base and away from the source material. The tactician has become an amateur at his own art, choosing to actively run at people with guns.

The movie's just a mess, it's worth a single watch, but the ending act will leave you wanting, the movie itself may leave you wanting to just stop.
Expand
2 of 8 users found this helpful26
All this user's reviews
5
silkLRApr 23, 2022
I'm sad, dialogues are poor, rhythm is so slow ... Maybe good for a naptime. Gotham the series make this batman savor less..
2 of 8 users found this helpful26
All this user's reviews
6
FlipbookApr 27, 2022
Although engaging by the end it is a long and boring slog to get there. I almost fell asleep during the first half of the movie just because I honestly didn't care about emo batman or the murders by weirdo riddler.
2 of 8 users found this helpful26
All this user's reviews
6
dogboyApr 20, 2022
This is a good movie with one major flaw - it is way too long. The editor on this movie failed badly as there was a lot that could have easily been cut. This is from someone who didn't think that the Snyder cut of Justice League was tooThis is a good movie with one major flaw - it is way too long. The editor on this movie failed badly as there was a lot that could have easily been cut. This is from someone who didn't think that the Snyder cut of Justice League was too long because it was packed full of awesome. This movie, however, is not packed full of awesome and I just lost interest a few times. Expand
1 of 4 users found this helpful13
All this user's reviews
6
LuciusMcGibbonApr 19, 2022
Honestly, there's no need for this movie to exist, let alone be this long. It's not great, it's not terrible, it's just there. For three hours. Basically a thematic mashup of the Dark Knight trilogy trying to make itself more down to earth byHonestly, there's no need for this movie to exist, let alone be this long. It's not great, it's not terrible, it's just there. For three hours. Basically a thematic mashup of the Dark Knight trilogy trying to make itself more down to earth by nerfing Batman's tech tree and making John Turturro one of the bad guys. Expand
1 of 4 users found this helpful13
All this user's reviews
5
xaliberMar 20, 2022
A potentially great film being held hostage by its PG-13 rating and its messy, all over the places screenwriting. By PG-13 I don't simply mean its visuals/goriness, but most importantly its dialogues, themes, and storytelling it tries toA potentially great film being held hostage by its PG-13 rating and its messy, all over the places screenwriting. By PG-13 I don't simply mean its visuals/goriness, but most importantly its dialogues, themes, and storytelling it tries to raise.

First, the dialogues. We get a glimpse of noir, but it soon falls flat due to a very uninteresting, plain, forgettable choice of words Batman used in his narration. Mind you, this is not a jab at Pattinson. But there is no emotion in his line of words. Batman in this film mutters words that are always very safe, very carefully chosen, which strikes as an odd contrast to Pattinson's tortured portrayal of Batman as someone with a seemingly pent up anger. His choice of words is very PG-13 so that the kids can understand what Batman is trying to convey.

Second, the storytelling. Despite being a film about vengeance-fueled Batman, we don't get to see him actually being in full "vengeance" mode. Batman's actions look very much apprehensive and controlled. Nothing too outrageous. Again, at odds with Pattinson's portrayal that seem to be full of anger; he's supposed to be really angry but somehow he still does not let his anger take the best of him.

Last, the depiction/visuals. I'm not speaking about cinematography (which is great), but how the scenes are depicted. The film sets this up as a film about hunting down a serial killer. But the film barely shows how cruel The Riddler can be to his victims. I'm not saying this film is terrible. The acting, given the limited script they had, is excellent. Pattinson did his best, so did Paul Dano (always likes him as a villain), Zoe Kravitz, and the rest. Cinematography is fantastic; the lighting, angle, everything here is very great that makes a couple of very good trailers - perhaps one could even say that the whole film trades off coherency for making the scenes "trailer-able". The music is iconic, although with an almost decent music directing. And I guess this detective Batman is a fresh breath of air.

But all that does not make the movie good as in the end it's still all over the places and very PG-13. Especially not with the 3 hours runtime where many scenes feel like a The Walking Dead filler episode.

If you're expecting a Batman film with similar gritty, tone to The Dark Knight trilogy or Joker, this film is not for you. But if you only want a live-action cartoon, I guess you can be satisfied with this one.
Expand
1 of 4 users found this helpful13
All this user's reviews
5
JedisarathMar 25, 2022
Probably the best live action iteration of batman from Detective comics.....
1 of 4 users found this helpful13
All this user's reviews
5
vicbelMar 6, 2022
One of the best Batman movies ever made!

And without a donut the best cinematography and better realices Gotham out of all
1 of 4 users found this helpful13
All this user's reviews
5
zackvillqMar 7, 2022
The Batman is a master piece undoubtedly, Robert Pattinson made and incredible interpretation with Zoe Kravitz as Catwoman.
1 of 4 users found this helpful13
All this user's reviews
6
bingding86Apr 22, 2022
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. The batman is dark and completely different to anything we witnessed in previous films, i found it hard to enjoy the portrayal of bruce wayne, roberts acting came across more twilight and moody tennager vibe. Very long, some characters really missed the mark for me Expand
2 of 9 users found this helpful27
All this user's reviews
5
brpoconnorMar 9, 2022
There were a lot of 'interesting' choices involved in the creation of this movie. To start, the dialogue sounds like it was written by an edgy 12-year-old boy. I suppose that's fitting since that seems to be the target audience. It wants toThere were a lot of 'interesting' choices involved in the creation of this movie. To start, the dialogue sounds like it was written by an edgy 12-year-old boy. I suppose that's fitting since that seems to be the target audience. It wants to be dark and edgy, without ever actually committing to anything dark or disturbing. It tries too hard while simultaneously falling flat. A lot of character decisions don't make much sense if you think about them too hard. The romance doesn't make any sense- it feels just shoved in there. There were some scenes that they clearly wanted to include, even if they didn't fit very well. Batman walking through water with people following- it's a cool shot, I admit, but it feels awkward and inconsistent with the rest of the scene/movie. Lastly, the movie is way too long at 3-hours. I don't regret watching it, but I wouldn't watch it again. The best part of this movie was that they included some amount of detective work on the part of batman- this is interesting and hasn't been included in other recent renditions of batman.

If you want to turn off your brain then this is probably a fine movie. If you have any bit of skepticism about what you're being presented, the movie will disappoint.
Expand
2 of 10 users found this helpful28
All this user's reviews
6
MathiasBSMar 8, 2022
It’s an okay movie, but definitely waaaaaaaaay too long - as in, it should have been half as long! The portrayal of The Riddler was probably my favorite part tablet it. He had an uncanny Ed Kemper vibe to him, that really made him feel veryIt’s an okay movie, but definitely waaaaaaaaay too long - as in, it should have been half as long! The portrayal of The Riddler was probably my favorite part tablet it. He had an uncanny Ed Kemper vibe to him, that really made him feel very scary.
The action scenes were also great.

What ruined it for me though, was Robert Pattinson as Batman.
The way Batman was portrayedwas too edgy and emo for my liking. I read a lot of the Batman comics, and I get that he’s actually very often portrayed like this in the comics, but he’s also portrayed like this big, burly dude who got a hurt a long time ago, and now he’s dishing out his vengeance. He’s like a hurt kid hiding behind a ton of muscles.
While Robert Pattinson brings the muscles to the table, you can’t help but notice that he just looks like pale a vampire (I’m sorry, but it’s true), which makes the character seem more like a depressed teen, than a man who’s seen some **** Also, all scenes with Bruce Wayne could have been omitted as they served no purpose to further the plot.

Speaking of the plot, it’s very convoluted and messy. It draws some light inspiration from The Long Halloween, but combines it with a bigger-than-life, nonsensical story about The Riddler that would have worked well in a comic, but in this movie it falls flat.

I think the main reason for this is that the movie tried very hard to be grounded and gritty, but fails to ever mention why there’s a guy dressed like a bat in this dirty, realistic Gotham.
On one hand I understand why they chose not to address this; we’ve all heard the story a thousand times, and it doesn’t need to be retold - but on the other hand, here we have a city filled with terrible crime and cop drama, while a guy runs around dressed like a bat and everyone just accepts it.
Sure, the movies tries to justify this when The Batman first appears by having some thugs make fun of his costumes, but it is never brought up again or even questioned.

In “Joker”, which also rooted it self in realism, the character works because we get the backstory and an explanation for why a criminal dressed as a clown makes sense in this world.
On the other hand, we have Christopher Nolan’s movies, which were also somewhat realistic, but added lots of techy elements, that made the inclusion of a man dressed as a hi-tech bat feel less questionable.
“The Batman” just flat out ignores this whole conundrum; it’s a gritty, dark crime drama with a guy in a bat costume. When you say that sentence out loud, you’ll understand why the movie didn’t work for me. I’m not saying they had to retell his entire origin story, but when choosing to ditch the gadgets, make every other character dress in something more realistic and make Bruce Wayne as 2D as possible, it just seems so stupid that this guy would run around in that costume in this world. I know, I know; I’m supposed to just accept the premise because it’s a beloved character, but in my opinion, it just didn’t work in the world this movie set up.
Expand
2 of 10 users found this helpful28
All this user's reviews
5
Thatman75Mar 5, 2022
Best Batman movie to date.
Best Batman movie to date.
Best Batman movie to date.
Best Batman movie to date.
2 of 10 users found this helpful28
All this user's reviews
6
Brent_MarchantMar 11, 2022
Were it not for the final hour of this vastly overlong, needlessly complicated, exceedingly derivative attempt at creating a compelling Batman noir saga, director Matt Reeves's stab at imprinting his mark on this legendary franchise leavesWere it not for the final hour of this vastly overlong, needlessly complicated, exceedingly derivative attempt at creating a compelling Batman noir saga, director Matt Reeves's stab at imprinting his mark on this legendary franchise leaves much to be desired. With an opening two hours that drone on endlessly with humorless, joyless, one-note darkness, the picture manages to redeem itself somewhat in its end run, though, by that point, it's almost irrelevant. The narrative's overreliance on rehashed plot devices, recurrent red herrings, uninspired action sequences, pedestrian villains and a surprising distance from its comic book roots combine to turn what should be a thrill ride into a mediocre snoozy slog. Thankfully, fine supporting performances from John Turturro, Colin Farrell and Paul Dano, as well as capable production values, help to enliven this project somewhat, but, again, this isn't enough to raise the film's overall quality level. Indeed, the rave factor being lavished on this offering truly isn't deserved, especially when compared to the movies in the Christopher Nolan trilogy, all three of which outclass this release at every turn. I can't say I'm sorry I saw this, but I doubt I'll watch it again or rush out to see any sequels that comes in its wake. Expand
1 of 5 users found this helpful14
All this user's reviews
5
laxmike26Mar 6, 2022
So good! I will definitely be watching it again! The music and story is amazing!
1 of 5 users found this helpful14
All this user's reviews
6
Sayeem_ShamsApr 27, 2022
So here are my thoughts on The Batman (2022):
- This movie is **** 3 hours long, and it damn feels like 3 hours! Maybe more than that!
- The mystery(s) was not great and didn't justify the duration at all. - The action scenes were intense but
So here are my thoughts on The Batman (2022):
- This movie is **** 3 hours long, and it damn feels like 3 hours! Maybe more than that!
- The mystery(s) was not great and didn't justify the duration at all.
- The action scenes were intense but fell short. - Lackluster screenplay.
+ Cinematography was excellent.
+ Sound design and Batman's theme was dope.
+ Robert Pattinson as a young Batman was impressive.
+ Catwoman and the Riddler were cool.
+ Got to see more BATMAN than BRUCE WAYNE.
From me: 6/10
Expand
1 of 5 users found this helpful14
All this user's reviews
6
Chempion1Apr 26, 2022
Ну, что сказать. Посмотрел я фильм только что и я разочарован.
Кино выглядит очень дёшево. Дёшево в нем всё. Сюжет начинается ни чем, ни чем и заканчивается. Костюмы выглядят ну очень так себе. Бэтмен большую часть фильма ездит не на супер
Ну, что сказать. Посмотрел я фильм только что и я разочарован.
Кино выглядит очень дёшево. Дёшево в нем всё. Сюжет начинается ни чем, ни чем и заканчивается. Костюмы выглядят ну очень так себе. Бэтмен большую часть фильма ездит не на супер навороченном бэтмобиле, а на дешёвом мотике. Вместо приборов ночного видения у него фонарик. ФОНАРИК У БЭТМЕНА!!!
Враги берутся неоткуда. Их мотивы тоже тайна. Лично я так и не понял мотивации "Загадочника". Да шишки Готэма уроды, но зачем убивать простых людей. Ещё я не понял зачем он сдался?
Так же не понял, какой осёл построил город в каком то котловане, который можно так легко затопить? А если землетрясение?
Более менее хорошо прорисован Альфред, да и то его убрали в середине фильма.
Честно говоря мне фильм больше напомнил какой то Condemned чем историю о тёмном рыцаре.
Признаюсь фильм начинал смотреть трижды. Первый раз заснул после 40 минут, второй раз ближе к финалу. Фильм невероятно нудный.
Хотя авторы как мне кажется решили сделать Брюса менее супер героем, а более человеком. Но это тоже не особо получилось. Паттинсон не обладает богатырской фигурой, но при весе в 70 кг умудряется расшвыривать 100 килограммовых мужиков пачками. Это ли не супер-дупер сила? То же касается и 40 килограммовой девочки кошки, у которой, опять таки, денег на нормальную маску не хватило.
Но самый большой вопрос у меня к персонажу "Пингвин". Зачем нужно было платить, я думаю не малые деньги, звезде Колину Фарреллу, если его лица всё равно узнать нельзя. На него натянули силиконовую маску, под которой мог находиться кто угодно. Да и сам персонаж какой то безыдейный. Кстати, почему его зовут пингвин я так и не понял.
Резюмирую. Фильм проходной, как по мне его ещё можно исправить в сиквеле, который точно будет, ведь в финале нам показали Джокера! Последний кстати тоже сидит в тюрьме Аркхэм. Чо он там делает и как попал, не понятно.
В сиквеле можно развить истории персонажей, может тогда фильм и заиграет.
Expand
1 of 5 users found this helpful14
All this user's reviews
4
Onlyclassicvg1Apr 24, 2022
El mejor batman de las peliculas!! ¡¡Pattinson clavado, y Matt Reeves nos dan la mejor película de Batman de todos los tiempos!!
1 of 5 users found this helpful14
All this user's reviews
5
Ellie_WilliamssApr 30, 2022
Красивые кадры, неплохие эффекты. Но надеюсь вернут Бэна и старого доброго Бэтмена.
1 of 5 users found this helpful14
All this user's reviews
6
pprjackjrMar 7, 2022
I was very hyped about this movie and i was a bit let down. The movie starts off good but as the story progresses it gets worse. My biggest disappointment was the riddler character. I will not spoil it but when i saw his costume i literallyI was very hyped about this movie and i was a bit let down. The movie starts off good but as the story progresses it gets worse. My biggest disappointment was the riddler character. I will not spoil it but when i saw his costume i literally could not believe my eyes. Its not bad by any means but i d never watch it again for sure. Expand
1 of 6 users found this helpful15
All this user's reviews
5
Toddy529Mar 9, 2022
The sexual tension between batman and cat is amazing. The riddler was perfect so **** funny if you have dark humor. Over all I felt like they did an amazing job at portraying every character
1 of 8 users found this helpful17
All this user's reviews
5
CriticSuckMar 10, 2022
Never listened to these idiotic critics who have never read a comic, and never will.
This movie is receiving the same kind of treatment as The Joker.
That movie turned out great and was highly profitable and the same can be said about this one.
1 of 8 users found this helpful17
All this user's reviews
6
BadCaseLawMar 4, 2022
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Even though I will tag this review as having spoilers I will still be as vague as possible so as not to ruin it for others. Like many others here I am a big Batman fan. I used to read the comics regularly, I have tattoos of Batman, Wonder Woman, Superman and Starfire – so I had high hope for this movie. The highlight of this movie for me was the cast, with the standouts being Pattinson, Wright and Farrell. Although I would have liked to have seen Farrell’s Penguin get a little more screen time – I mean this is a 3 hour movie. Also on that note, Andy Serkis is a great Alfred (who seems to be inspired by the Earth One graphic novels), but again he hardly has any screen time.

This movie is more of a thriller type story which I was completely into – it suits Batman and they did nail the tone of the movie. The time passed quickly despite the movie’s length. There were some lulls in the action, but the action that was there was fantastic.

So why only a 6 when others are giving 10s? Because the ending was terrible. Batman doesn’t out think or even catcher the Riddler. The only reason he gets caught is because he lets himself get caught. Then it is revealed that there is one more secret so I get my hopes back up thinking this is how Batman wins, but nope. Batman does figure out what is about to happen, but doesn’t stop it.

Then there is this stupid scene with Riddler copycats who manage to overwhelm Batman so he needs saving by Catwoman. In the end Batman gets a consolation prize. He saves some people from drowning. Good for him. I mean the Riddler still carried out his plan, and lets himself be caught, so Batman didn’t stop anything. It really ruined the movie for me.

If the ending had been more clever and Batman was able to out think the Riddler and stop his plans somehow in a well written manner then this movie would be one of the best Superhero movies I have seen, but honestly the ending was so bad I’ll probably never watch it again.
Expand
0 of 10 users found this helpful010
All this user's reviews
6
sugarniteMar 10, 2022
I get the feeling that this movie is a lot of people’s first 3 hour movie. That may be the reason for the outlandish praise.

It’s not the best Batman movie, but there are images that stuck with me in ways that no other image in a superhero
I get the feeling that this movie is a lot of people’s first 3 hour movie. That may be the reason for the outlandish praise.

It’s not the best Batman movie, but there are images that stuck with me in ways that no other image in a superhero movie did. Elements of this are actually really good.

Most of what you see is nothing new, but I think it’s worth watching for the little bit that is.
Expand
0 of 4 users found this helpful04
All this user's reviews
6
MotoserdarMar 8, 2022
More Max Payne than Batman. All visuals, character relations, mood and everything made me feel that I was watching Max Payne in a mask.

No wow moments, lack of smart and creative action, boring and long conversations with face close ups and
More Max Payne than Batman. All visuals, character relations, mood and everything made me feel that I was watching Max Payne in a mask.

No wow moments, lack of smart and creative action, boring and long conversations with face close ups and exxagerated drama. It should have been an hour shorter at least.

Colin Farrell was a fantastic Penguin tho!
Expand
0 of 6 users found this helpful06
All this user's reviews
4
Simcity890Apr 12, 2022
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. You know, the Batman had the best shot to be a memorable movie, I expected to guard it in my heart forever, it almost did the job, but because of its prejudice it didn’t quite make the cut.
It’s really sad of how much is made by horrible people who obviously hate children, just look at it. In the superhero movie market there’s an obvious prejudice of children, JUST LOOK AT IT, what MCU and DCEU movie had an child superhero between 2008-2020 (or even before)? All the child actors became lost and quickly replaced (like the daughter of the character ant-man). 2021 was a big progress with the television series wandavision, there were two child superheroes in this show! But it was a difficult time for the child actors, that got replaced each day by one kid older than them, and by Disney’s choice the two characters were killed, what a shame.
Now this movie shows that we are in a deplorable condition, the first draft of the movie “the Batman and the Robin” was great, it really would have showed the world that kids also deserve respect. But by demand of the company Warner Brothers Robin was completely taken down of the film (and the actor that worked day by day hard on the movie discarded like it was a parasite.). We are lucky that the script got leaked, or otherwise we would see the prejudice, but not understand that it wasn’t the director’s fault, but a company move.
The movie is still great, but it feels empty, when Batman is driving the bat-mobile you can feel the lack of the boy wonder driving a bike at his side, when (spoilers) the bomb hits Alfred you can feel that Robin should have been there at his side, (when Batman is on the hospital is obvious that they reused the scene were he demanded Robin to shut up and go back to sleep while he talked with Alfred, but sadly it got edited). The Bruce Wayne of this film was and is criticized and with all right, because he only made sense if he was passing on the crisis that is being a father that wants to be relatable to his kid. Not only that but all children on this movie are depicted as sad and annoying little brats that only suffer, a truly sad state to Hollywood.
Now every time that you see the movie, remember, Robin should be there. All the emotion, character development and dynamics left out.
The saddest thing was the Batman and Catwomen kiss scene, were in realty it was supposed to be focused on Robin, jealous of that woman stealing his man, with an entire flashback of the beautiful night Dick and Bruce got to know each other, they had finnaly found love in their life, together, it would have been a masterpiece.
Now all we can do is show that we want children in our movies, and that we are ashamed of this prejudice happening for years and years at this point. #realesetheRobincut
Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
6
RheeturdMay 6, 2022
I mean Paul Dano very well may be the worst big name actor, but he didn't ruin The Batman, which was a confusing movie in and of itself. It did have me laughing uproariously at a couple points.
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews