Rialto Pictures | Release Date: January 9, 2004
8.1
USER SCORE
Universal acclaim based on 69 Ratings
USER RATING DISTRIBUTION
Positive:
57
Mixed:
6
Negative:
6
Watch Now
Buy On
Review this movie
VOTE NOW
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Check box if your review contains spoilers 0 characters (5000 max)
10
Joe50119Feb 18, 2011
Powerful, gut wrenching, moving and biographical film. This film shows all aspects of an insurgency against a superior military force within an urban setting. Extremely relevant considering the Iraq War. The scenes involving the killing ofPowerful, gut wrenching, moving and biographical film. This film shows all aspects of an insurgency against a superior military force within an urban setting. Extremely relevant considering the Iraq War. The scenes involving the killing of innocents on both sides is simply gut wrenching. You see the true face of war. The film also shows involves crimes by both sides, French and Algerian, making no distinction between the two. The scene of the terrorist bombing of the cafe and its aftermath leaves the viewer no doubt that Pontecorvo views the deaths of innocents to be the same no matter what the nationality. The leadership of the insurgency is shown as well as the French paratrooper commander. This film is a must for those who want to truly understand guerrilla warfare in an urban setting and the tragedy of it all. The torture scenes are especially moving and will bring the viewer to tears. Best foreign film of all time. Expand
3 of 3 users found this helpful30
All this user's reviews
10
WaelS.Sep 5, 2006
The best I ever saw at my house.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
9
PatC.Mar 30, 2007
So immersing that one hardly notices as it shifts between being an action drama and a documentary. Told from the leftist perspective, it invites the viewer to form a political opinion, which is how these things always get started in the So immersing that one hardly notices as it shifts between being an action drama and a documentary. Told from the leftist perspective, it invites the viewer to form a political opinion, which is how these things always get started in the first place. But, as history, knowing what happened in Algeria is essential to understanding what is happening now. Blaming the French and wanting to exterminate terrorists have always been no-brainers, and the film almost condones both. The ending is tidy, but the implications are not, so one may find the show awesome and informative without clarifying one's moral compass. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
9
lasttimeisawSep 13, 2013
Algerian Government subsidized and hired Italian director Gillo Pontecorvo to shoot a film to recount the bloody clash between FLN (Algerian National Liberation Front) and French colonial only few years after its independence (1962). The filmAlgerian Government subsidized and hired Italian director Gillo Pontecorvo to shoot a film to recount the bloody clash between FLN (Algerian National Liberation Front) and French colonial only few years after its independence (1962). The film was not only won GOLDEN LION in Venice in 1966 and an Academy Awards nomination for BEST FOREIGN LANGUAGE FILM in 1967 but also was nominated for BEST DIRECTOR and SCREENPLAY in 1969 for a rare second round.

THE BATTLE OF ALGIERS impresses its viewers with a haunting collection of close-up portraits of various people (both French and Algerian) under a soul-searching orchestration emphasized by stark chiaroscuro, it was years after Italian Neo-Realism, but the non-professional cast (the only pro is a wiry and bulged-eyed Jean Martin, who commands a stance of military mettle perfectly) and locale-revamping contributes a great amount of authenticity in the final work. There are plenty of overlooking angles with extensive depth of focus to examine and the city and enlighten one’s appreciation, plus there are fleeting montages of torture under interrogation are disturbing but can potently generates a sense of boldness to show audience the cruelty in reality. However the most indelible ones are the waiting-for-the-bombs-to-explode experiences, with camera panning over innocent white victims-to-be unwittingly relish their last moment of hedonism, utterly guarantee a surge of compassion out of shock value terms.

Therefore, the film should also be extolled by its unbiased perspective in telling its stories from both parts, dispassionately channels viewers to witness the vindictive constitution lying underneath common humanity and the aimless and reproachable tit-for-tat acts ensuring. There are radical debates as regards the essence of revolution, a much more penetrating motto is revolution doesn’t mean war and terrorism is not a means to win a revolution, which should be indoctrinated all over the world, especially to those tinderboxes where religious and political threats are pervading rampantly at present.

Showing no partiality to either sides is not an easy move since the production was backed and green-lit by one of the government, thus the film is a genuine gem in retaining the integrity and fabricating a gripping panorama of a chain of bloodshed and baring its true color under the stark daylight.
Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
VerbalCantJul 9, 2012
Handles suspense better than most modern thrillers, the scenes with the female bombers are absolutely brilliantly done. It's agitprop... but what isn't, and it handles it well. None of the characters are over sympathetic, and the politics isHandles suspense better than most modern thrillers, the scenes with the female bombers are absolutely brilliantly done. It's agitprop... but what isn't, and it handles it well. None of the characters are over sympathetic, and the politics is all abot the confrontation not about the issues. I think the only perspective missing is the french back in Europe... why are the soldiers there? A very good film. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
9
gracjanskiMar 28, 2020
Tensed movie with a serious political topic. Fortunately this movie isnt for the masses and the movies shows details how to begin a revolution, it was almost a documentary. I also liked, that the movie showed also the ugly sides of theTensed movie with a serious political topic. Fortunately this movie isnt for the masses and the movies shows details how to begin a revolution, it was almost a documentary. I also liked, that the movie showed also the ugly sides of the Algerians and was not onesided.
Great movie, of course a bit old already.
Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
9
EpicLadySpongeApr 29, 2016
Now when you see films like this, you're going to expect the same thing over and over again. True and false. True because these things were made back in the 20th century where color wasn't even a thing to films until someone found out aboutNow when you see films like this, you're going to expect the same thing over and over again. True and false. True because these things were made back in the 20th century where color wasn't even a thing to films until someone found out about Technicolor. False because this plot plays differently than what you think and it's a great one you're seeing here. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
zlatanmazuidiSep 15, 2019
I really cannot understand the popel that votet negatively here. I mean there is no mistake in this film except telling the truth about war.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews