SummaryThe year is 2044: artificial intelligence controls all facets of a stoic society as humans routinely “erase” their feelings. Hoping to eliminate pain caused by their past-life romances, Gabrielle (Léa Seydoux) continually falls in love with different incarnations of Louis (George MacKay). Set first in Belle Époque-era Paris Louis is a Br...
SummaryThe year is 2044: artificial intelligence controls all facets of a stoic society as humans routinely “erase” their feelings. Hoping to eliminate pain caused by their past-life romances, Gabrielle (Léa Seydoux) continually falls in love with different incarnations of Louis (George MacKay). Set first in Belle Époque-era Paris Louis is a Br...
By putting technology on trial as the chief parasite causing modern malaise, but fusing it with a melodrama about love, Bonello has created a wholly original work that pulses with prescience.
'The Beast' tests your patience with its long runtime, cryptic story, and unconventional editing. But getting involved pays off because Bertrand Bonello offers a mix of genres, interesting ideas about human connection, and complex storytelling that converge in the relationship of two individuals transcending time and space. It's like a more contemplative version of 'The Matrix' injected with a fine dose of Lynchian content. A romantic drama embedded in science fiction that has a lot to say about where we are headed as a species in a world increasingly obsessed with production and performance.
Rather than copying the core premise of the short story, Bonello’s French- and English-language adaptation uses James’ dense, descriptive prose to weave detailed textures and sensations in each of his timelines.
Its devotion to the untamed territory of the human heart, its artfully discombobulating time and locale shifts, the shifting personae handled with marvelous fluidity by Seydoux; it takes you somewhere, and more than one somewhere.
The Beast is an unusual film: challenging, ambitious, and inward. Even when inscrutable, as it often is, it holds the attention, though less so the longer it lasts, and it lasts nearly 2½ hours.
In one of those odd happenstances of cinema, The Beast shares those themes of processing romantic trauma through temporal displacement with Alice Lowe’s Monty Python-esque Timestalker: but La bête lacks its pithiness and humanity.
Baseado no clássico "A fera na selva" do Henry James, o escritor oitocentista ainda está estupefato pela racionalização da sociedade burguesa, e captura um sentimento que ainda estava germinando: a eterna ansiedade, na busca por algo que unca se concretiza.
Essa ansiedade é fruto da nossa obsessão por tentar racinalizar e prever nossos atos, e isso se vale desde domar as paixões até aspectos mais macro (o socialismo seria o ápice do pensamento instrumental domesticado). Com isso, a fera está ali, à espreita, no que Freud chamaria de impulsos de vida e de morte, tornando-nos mais irracionais do que gosstaríamos.
Assim, Bonello atualiza o conto em três momentos distintos, do mais precário quanto aos avanços tecnológicos até o momento em que dispomos de inteligência artificial para tentar apaziguar nossos medos mais intimos e nos tornar exemplares corretos do "homem-econômico", cujo cálculo está à palma da mão.
Enquanto Henry James mantém-se otimista e opta pela redenção ao amor, em pleno século XXI não há mais espaço para histórias de contos de fada. Não há salvação. O medo, a mor, a ansiedade, a inveja (a cena dela quebrando o vaso por puro deleite), todos são indomáveis, e como diria, novamente, Freud, é um "mal estar da civilização" a que estamos condenados.
A chave de tudo é ver-se espantado com o que nos torna humano mesmo, com nossos sentimentos, eclipsado pelo fortesol da razão. E não será a IA, muito menos a arte que irá nos redimir. O futuro? Não sabemos. O filme tenta assim ser um contraponto a Henry James no pior sentido, pessimista, frio. Falha no ritmo e na atuação algumas vezes, mas seu espítito sóbrio e desesperançoso resta intacto.
Impressive and provocative film without being too woke , worth mentioning these days . (Even though even here there was a whole scene / part about incel culture and all that , try provoking Blm / antifa types for a change that would be fresh!)
The best elements of the film are the mixup parts of eternal sunshine of the spotless mind clashing with more David Lynch / Cronenberg like time-travel horror. This fusion is about as strange as it sounds and very interesting , quasi romantic but also very tense and scary .
French films are still doing their thing in this age , very glad to see that as a fellowEuropean in this over globalist age.
The coolest thing about this film is the closing credits. Not because it's a relief after a 2.5 hour movie, but a QR code is projected to scan for the credits. The time before that is a slog thru a confusing and very slow sci-fi drama. It takes place in an AI-run future where emotions are frowned upon, so Léa Seydoux decides to purify her DNA to eliminate emotion from her existence. Enter George Mackay, who she was romantically involved with over 3 past lives in 1910, 2014 and 2044. This process unfolds very slowly and confusingly without any cool effects…just lots of their interactions. Seydoux and Mackay capture many their emotions with depth, adding an earnest layer. Still, this French import is an exercise in weird concepts that left little emotional impact and plenty of questions. BTW, there's no scary titular monster.
The year is 2044: artificial intelligence controls all facets of a stoic society as humans routinely “erase” their feelings. Hoping to eliminate pain caused by their past-life romances, Gabrielle (Léa Seydoux) continually falls in love with different incarnations of Louis (George MacKay). Set first in Belle Époque-era Paris Louis is a British man who woos her away from a cold husband, then in early 21st Century Los Angeles, he is a disturbed American bent on delivering violent “retribution.” Will the process allow Gabrielle to fully connect with Louis in the present, or are the two doomed to repeat their previous fates?
I've seen this described as Drama Romance Sci-Fi ThrillerI didn't see any of that. I think I'm losing my taste or something. I've heard that a symptom of Covid is a loss of taste. Can you lose your taste in movies? That's two in a row of bad movies I've had to sit through.
This one I did take short naps through periods, waiting for a loud noise to wake me up. Another avant-garde artsy-crafty movie that can only be appreciated by the film critics. I can't see how this got good reviews. I thought with Lea Sedoux it would be worth watching. It wasn't.
It didn't have a rating, but I'd give it a PG-13, maybe an R for the use of the F-word a couple of times. In French with subscripts.I don't know what this movie was about. I didn't understand the story or the plot, if there was one. I'm going to have to be very careful in picking my next movie.
Yes, The Beast offers beautiful imagery, references to great works of art, impeccable acting, and stunning costumes and sets. But let’s be honest: the story just doesn’t make sense. It goes nowhere and never truly questions the viewer about the themes it sets out to explore, like AI or love. Instead, it leaves us with confusion, and even the director doesn’t deny this. Keep that in mind when reading reviews that praise the story itself.
If human emotions are as abstract as the reference to Madame Butterfly suggests, impossible to fully understand — and if AI, DNA, and technology are so abstract that their dangers can’t even be shown, then what are we actually talking about exactly?
The film feels like something primitive people would create after being visited by a more evolved civilisation: What if the photograph steals my soul? The director seems to be saying, We don’t know how this works, but trust me: it will happen!
Ultimately, if you’re interested in cinema as an exercise in mood and abstraction, this film might work for you. But if you're seeking any kind of storytelling, expect 2.5 hours of confusion.