The Survivalist

Name: The Survivalist
Genre: Sci-Fi, Drama, Thriller
Released: May 19, 2017
Duration: 104 min
Rating: 80
Cast: Andrew Simpson, Barry Ward, Douglas Russell, Hussina Raja, Kieri Kennedy

2017

METASCORE

Generally favorable reviews based on 10 Critic Reviews

See All

USER SCORE

Generally favorable reviews based on 23 Ratings

See All

6.4

VOTE NOW

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

6.4	Your Score
6.4	User Score Generally favorable reviews based on 23 Ratings

Would you like to write a review?

There is a 75 character minimum for reviews. If your review contains spoilers, please check the Spoiler box. Please do not use ALL CAPS. There is no linking or other HTML allowed. Your review may be edited for content. 0/5000

Check box if your review contains spoilers

Play Sound

Please enter your birth date to watch this video:

You are not allowed to view this material at this time.

The Survivalist

Now Playing: The Survivalist

Movie Details & Credits

IFC Midnight | Release Date: May 19, 2017 | Not Rated

Starring: Andrew Simpson, Barry Ward, Douglas Russell, Hussina Raja, Kieri Kennedy, Martin McCann, Mia Goth, Michael Og Lane, Olwen Fouere, Ryan McParland

Summary: A lone man strikes a bargain with two women as they fight to survive roving gangs and the harsh isolation of a kill-or-be-killed world.

Director: Stephen Fingleton

Genre(s): Sci-Fi, Drama, Thriller

Rating: Not Rated

Runtime: 104 min

See All Details and Credits

Awards & Rankings

78	#78 Best Movie of 2017

Watch Now

Buy On

Metascore

Positive:

Mixed:

Negative:

Critic Reviews

Jeannette Catsoulis

May 18, 2017

Impressively lean and rigidly controlled, “The Survivalist” achieves, at times, the primitive allure of a silent movie. Read full review

The Film Stage Ed Frankl

Apr 21, 2017

This is a strangely believable dystopia, and all the more brilliant for it. Read full review

The Guardian Peter Bradshaw

Apr 21, 2017

The physical suspense is all but unbearable: a sexualised hunger, fear and need. Fingleton writes and directs with gusto and flair. Read full review

Kim Newman

Apr 21, 2017

This is a harsh, unsentimental science fiction film, though the performances suggest small surviving flames of empathy and yearning amid the tough, practical attitudes. Read full review

Matt Glasby

Apr 21, 2017

Too slow for the mainstream, perhaps, this presents a disgusted worldview thats painstakingly plausible, however much we may wish differently. Read full review

Katie Walsh

May 18, 2017

The camera work is meticulous and exquisite in its expression, creating a sense of tense foreboding throughout, linking characters and images with a creepy omniscience. Read full review

David James

Apr 21, 2017

Lean and mean, The Survivalist a realistically miserable apocalypse - and all the more terrifying for it. Read full review

SEE ALL 10 REVIEWS

Write a Review

User Reviews

Acclamation

Dec 10, 2017

This is not a the typical Hollywood movie. Actually, I probably don’t have to say anything else, but I will.

This film is all characters. What would you do? Unlike most of the crap that is in American films, this is quite realistic and takes one on a journey to California’s future.This is not a the typical Hollywood movie. Actually, I probably don’t have to say anything else, but I will.

This film is all characters. What would you do? Unlike most of the crap that is in American films, this is quite realistic and takes one on a journey to California’s future. There is no Liberal insanity (agenda), which is insanely refreshing.
Watch it, and think about it.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

shoulderoforion

May 20, 2017

good flick bordering on the almost great, one reviewer i read said it was "lean", lol, yeah, this is the leanest post apocalyptic film you're going to see, interesting themes in this envisioning of when everything goes to hell & stays there. worth the watch.

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

Scraper

Apr 16, 2018

The Survivalist shows self-preservation from a very psychological perspective. There is planting and hunting for instance but the crux of the movie is whom to trust and when. A quiet film with intense, expressive faces, and sporadic heart-pounding moments. Incredibly engaging with absolutelyThe Survivalist shows self-preservation from a very psychological perspective. There is planting and hunting for instance but the crux of the movie is whom to trust and when. A quiet film with intense, expressive faces, and sporadic heart-pounding moments. Incredibly engaging with absolutely zero humor.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

HotelCentral

Apr 19, 2018

I'm not sure who would really be into this film in a serious way except possibly right-wing neoCons who fantasize about the day when nothing matters except the power of guns and the ruthless determination to take whatever one needs to survive, without regard to any inconveniences such asI'm not sure who would really be into this film in a serious way except possibly right-wing neoCons who fantasize about the day when nothing matters except the power of guns and the ruthless determination to take whatever one needs to survive, without regard to any inconveniences such as ethics or morals or laws.

The film runs for just over 100 minutes. It's relentlessly grim and so narrowly focused that the viewer gets no clue as to what has happened to the world or where civilization has gone, if indeed it has gone anywhere. Our main characters say so little that we learn virtually nothing about any of them, except that it's made clear that none of them are bothered much by the aforementioned lack of ethics, morals, or laws.

As post-apocalyptic films go, this isn't the worst I've seen, but there's nothing in any way supernatural to add spice to the brew. In fact my main complaint is that I spent most of the film waiting for something to happen. The plot is threadbare. The dialog would pose no disturbance inside a public library. There is an attempt to make the "Survivalist's" efforts to survive appear credible, but the efforts come up short. (For one thing, plan on planting a minimum of half an acre per person per year if you want to subsist by farming. The film shows us about 20 square feet or so hidden away in the middle of the woods and laughably describes this as "enough for one".)

If the title strikes you as interesting, then give the film a try. But don't expect it to be a happy event.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

Fibrofilms

Oct 10, 2019

A generous 2 considering you could write the script on the back of a condom wrapper. With so many good critic reviews I painfully sat until the end but reader please don’t be fooled. ‘Mad Max in the countyside’. The film was more like Mad Max in his uncles Shed with an overused 1970’sA generous 2 considering you could write the script on the back of a condom wrapper. With so many good critic reviews I painfully sat until the end but reader please don’t be fooled. ‘Mad Max in the countyside’. The film was more like Mad Max in his uncles Shed with an overused 1970’s Playboy magazine.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

Spacevessel

Aug 23, 2017

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. !SPOILERS!

I imagine this is happening in some sort of post-war world, where people have to survive on their own without energy. If it isn't so, we are not told anything anyway.

So an old woman and a young girl continuously try to kill a lonely young man in his small wooden house in the middle of the forest. The one that treated them fairly well, fed them, and could possibly protect them and be very useful. Yes, the younger one offered sex for all of this, and it was a mutual agreement, yet they continued to try killing him again. What was their plan - to live together in his house happily ever after? It wasn't about robbery, he clearly didn't have much of value, and the women had enough time to see that.

Then, out of nowhere comes a bunch of ill-motivated men wearing masks (as if it still mattered in their world whether their faces would be seen or not) trying to kill everyone in the house, apparently, while destroying his crops. The three of them did not compete for anything in that forest, so what was the point of attacking them, with an intention to kill? Why would you destroy crops in a world where food is hard to come by? Maybe the attackers had something else in mind, they probably wouldn't kill a young female, and maybe they would try to convince the guy to join them as well, but the two parties were not given a chance to talk, in fact, they didn't even see each other before the final shoot-out. I had an impression the women have escaped from their previous camp, and the dudes were searching for them, but again - nothing is explained.

It's hard to see anyone's intention here, since characters barely speak (the main man is mumbling in Irish (I suppose) at times, to add that "extra flavor"), and their actions make no sense. Everyone is simply homicidal for no apparent reason, and no coherent story is shown.

The director clearly didn't use his thinker too much with this one, he was too busy showing us cock, ass and **** close-ups (hello, Mia Goth fans), and trying to attract unwise survival-minded viewers. It seems the movie has no other point than to show how unreasonable people (and movie directors) can be.… Expand

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

SEE ALL 6 REVIEWS

More You Might Like

tbd

SuperBob

47 Meters Down

London Fields

Heist

Extraction