X
- 2005
- R
- Twentieth Century Fox
- 1 h 27 m
- 2005
- R
- Twentieth Century Fox
- 1 h 27 m
Summary Jason Statham returns in his signature role as ex-Special Forces operative Frank Martin, aka "The Transporter." Now retired in Miami, Martin makes a living driving for a wealthy family, including the young son, with whom he has unexpectedly bonded. But when the boy is abducted, Martin must use all his skills to bring him to safety and di...
Directed By: Louis Leterrier
Written By: Luc Besson, Robert Mark Kamen
- 2005
- R
- Twentieth Century Fox
- 1 h 27 m
- 2005
- R
- Twentieth Century Fox
- 1 h 27 m
Transporter 2
56
3.8
Where to Watch
Summary Jason Statham returns in his signature role as ex-Special Forces operative Frank Martin, aka "The Transporter." Now retired in Miami, Martin makes a living driving for a wealthy family, including the young son, with whom he has unexpectedly bonded. But when the boy is abducted, Martin must use all his skills to bring him to safety and di...
Directed By: Louis Leterrier
Written By: Luc Besson, Robert Mark Kamen
Where to Watch
Top Cast
Metascore
Mixed or Average
Based on 29 Critic Reviews
56
48% Positive
14 Reviews
14 Reviews
45% Mixed
13 Reviews
13 Reviews
7% Negative
2 Reviews
2 Reviews
Metascore
Mixed or Average
Based on 29 Critic Reviews
56
48% Positive
14 Reviews
14 Reviews
45% Mixed
13 Reviews
13 Reviews
7% Negative
2 Reviews
2 Reviews
Delivers a satisfying late-summer escapist treat.
Chucks the laws of logic and physics out the passenger's-side window, and it's all the better for it.
User Score
Generally Unfavorable
Based on 352 User Ratings
3.8
26% Positive
93 Ratings
93 Ratings
24% Mixed
83 Ratings
83 Ratings
50% Negative
176 Ratings
176 Ratings
User Score
Generally Unfavorable
Based on 352 User Ratings
3.8
26% Positive
93 Ratings
93 Ratings
24% Mixed
83 Ratings
83 Ratings
50% Negative
176 Ratings
176 Ratings
These peoples that rated below 4,the negative reviews think that is genius of cinema expert,even the average of critics rated are mixed,here and in RT.....
Report
Another all-kicking, punching, shooting and exploding dose of Besson born action, and Jason Statham proves that his action mettle in the first instalment was no fluke.
Choreographer Corey Yuen's use of a fire hose is far more creative than anything in the stale kidnapper plot.
Like a cross between "Man on Fire" and "Bad Boys 2," this demolition derby delivers eye-popping action sequences that would make even the Roadrunner roll his eyes in disbelief.
This stripped-down premise made the first "Transporter" fun: It's all about driving skills and choreographed fights, not logic. Even with so few requirements, Transporter 2 runs on empty.
Surprisingly, Transporter 2 is only slightly below the height of the thrills the first one took us to. It doesn't move past the first one, but it doesn't lag behind either. Instead, it almost copies it. This could have more positive effects than negative though; kind of like a saving grace to a series so that a second sequel can be made.
Report
Hard to even imagine this movie is actually the continuation of 'Transporter' the first one since everything until the overall atmosphere changed. At the end of all this mess I even wondered if I truly watched 'Transporter 2' or another dumb action movie with Statham. In this 'Transporter' movie Statham doesn't transport anything else than a kiddo for something like 10 minutes. Wrong title for the wrong film.
The dialogues are really flat, dull and lame. The editing and special effects are terrible even if car crashed are quite realistic and enjoyable in overall. Stunts also look awesome when they are not totally unrealistic. Action scenes are over-cut. Music is effortless: pretty decent for such a movie I guess. The acting is dreadful from everybody especially the french cop (François Berléand). I speak french but I'm not French and I truly enjoyed the so-called racist jokes on French people.
The romance is boring and predictable. Some jokes remains funny and particularly those linked to the first movie. These are pretty easter eggs. Once again we are treated to a strange scene where Statham covers his body with oil or mud just like in the first opus. So what is this wierd fantasy of the directors with oiled bodies? It makes me way too uncomfortable. The fact that most of the fights are pointless or truly avoidable doesn't help at all. I mean if you are one of the bad guys and the nice dude doesn't stop messing with your plans just shoot him! I stop counting all the scenes where Statham is blocked but managed to escape just because bad guys don't shoot him. On the top of it this movie contains one the stupidest villain plans of all the films I've seen, making the main bad guy look dumb. All along the movie some major stereotypes are spread. To cite another of them than the unavoidable balls-kicking and nuts shots we could speak about the amazingly vulgar presence of the villain woman overly-sexualized. They don't even tried to explain her partial but constant and unavoidable nudity with the scenario. Speaking of the scenario: wow. In less than 20 minutes we have totally witnessed this movie have a seizure. There are inconsistencies and laughable events everywhere. It's almost a parody excepted that everyone takes it way too seriously.
Report
