User Score
8.4

Universal acclaim- based on 129 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Negative: 9 out of 129

Review this album

  1. Your Score
    0 out of 10
    Rate this:
    • 10
    • 9
    • 8
    • 7
    • 6
    • 5
    • 4
    • 3
    • 2
    • 1
    • 0
    • 0
  1. Submit
  2. Check Spelling
  1. BeautifulCreature
    Jan 14, 2008
    0
    MetaCritic never posts my reviews
  2. Really??
    Jan 19, 2008
    1
    Sharon Jones did it first and still does it better...and to my recollection has never been boo-ed off stage.
  3. CK
    Feb 18, 2008
    3
    Amy has a nice voice, but her songs don't do anything for me. I can't recommend this album to anyone.
  4. ChadK
    Dec 24, 2007
    3
    Why does the media love her so much? This album doesn't even reach the mediocracy of Back to Black, yet it still receives rave reviews. Puzzeling, huh?
  5. John
    Feb 16, 2008
    1
    She really has an awful voice. The only reason to listen to this kind of crap is when you want to be a whiny poseur who "thinks drugs are the worst thing in the world". Sorry to say, but the only reason to listen to this is because she is a really sad person.
  6. ChrisH
    Dec 23, 2007
    1
    Horrendous, souless, cynically produced, public school brat, neo-pop-jazz, trendwhore dross. I'm sure you love it. Don't you?
Metascore
78

Generally favorable reviews - based on 11 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 9 out of 11
  2. Negative: 0 out of 11
  1. Winehouse's record has the feeling of being allowed to grow on its own--without being meddled with and fussed over.
  2. Frank is an honest, refreshingly personal record which, though very occasionally strays into easy jazz, has Gucci bags of personality.
  3. Entertainment Weekly
    91
    Her first album--a UK smash in '03, now being issued here-- bristles with fiercer intelligence, though it lacks the classic soul-warmth of the Mark Ronson-produced Black. [16 Nov 2007, p.79]