User Score
8.4

Universal acclaim- based on 17 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 14 out of 17
  2. Mixed: 0 out of 17
  3. Negative: 3 out of 17

Review this album

  1. Your Score
    0 out of 10
    Rate this:
    • 10
    • 9
    • 8
    • 7
    • 6
    • 5
    • 4
    • 3
    • 2
    • 1
    • 0
    • 0
  1. Submit
  2. Check Spelling
  1. Jan 6, 2023
    3
    It's just the same songs from years ago with a more orchestral edge. Nothing changes the songs at all, it just feels like she couldn't be asked to make a vast, deep record like she did with recent records.
  2. Apr 18, 2017
    0
    Sleep sleep sleep sleep sleep, this album was just so boring, I love Blue, but this album was just so bland and boring. 2002 was a great year for music, and this album wasnt the reason why
  3. stephenc
    Aug 15, 2005
    10
    Masterpiece.
  4. BillieC
    Apr 13, 2005
    10
    Simply the finest album I have ever listened to. And I have listened to it hundreds of times. I can't believe this masterpiece! It is a thrilling lable of love.
  5. RichardS
    Dec 11, 2002
    10
    This is a glorious record transcendent and towering.
  6. DustinR
    Nov 29, 2002
    10
    It is really something. You must not only listen to it once; it is much more complex than most pop shit you hear now days.
Metascore
68

Generally favorable reviews - based on 9 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 6 out of 9
  2. Negative: 0 out of 9
  1. If you can forget that Mitchell once used to swing, the settings offer warmth and bring out melodies that weren't apparent her first time around.
  2. At moments lush and beautiful, at others overly busy, but never less than daring.
  3. Blender
    40
    Her hits are underrepresented, more recent songs are overrepresented, and [Vince] Mendoza's overly ornate orchestrations are dull, self-absorbed affairs, frequently swamping the great songs and Mitchell's vocals. [#12, p.147]