User ratings in Music are temporarily disabled. More info
  • Record Label:
  • Release Date:
Wall Of Arms Image
Metascore
75

Generally favorable reviews - based on 10 Critic Reviews What's this?

User Score
8.5

Universal acclaim- based on 17 Ratings

  • Summary: The second album for the British indie-rock quintet was produced by Markus Dravs.
Score distribution:
  1. Positive: 7 out of 10
  2. Negative: 0 out of 10
  1. Wall Of Arms is an expansive, confident second album that takes The Maccabees from indie also-rans to genuine contenders.
  2. With this record the Maccabees join the Horrors and Jack Peñate as supposedly "landfill indie" acts who've come back fighting with far superior second efforts.
  3. Wall of Arms is an album that will give more the more time you give it. It’s expansive without being overblown, meticulous without being tedious, and hints at even greater things come album three.
  4. Wall of Arms is the meticulously evolved sound of a band aiming to bid to breathe life into British indie.
  5. Really, what you’re left with is an accomplished album, delivered with passion and feeling, that’s easy to acknowledge as pretty good--to admire, even--but hard to be seriously moved by.
  6. Q Magazine
    60
    It's too easy to mistake them for any number of other bands--Editors, Maximo Park, The Futureheads all spring to mind--but if it's not original, it's still done weell. [Jun 2009, p.125]
  7. Each track in its own right has nothing inherently wrong with it, but put eleven of them together and it’s all a little one-dimensional.

See all 10 Critic Reviews

Score distribution:
  1. Positive: 4 out of 4
  2. Mixed: 0 out of 4
  3. Negative: 0 out of 4
  1. PabloL
    May 20, 2009
    9
    I expected a bunch of nice tunes like in the first album, and Maccabees came with a truly, preciously beautiful album!
  2. MC
    May 23, 2009
    9
    Excellent follow-up to the debut, darker and more accomplished. Less playful than the original (it still has its moments) but overall the Excellent follow-up to the debut, darker and more accomplished. Less playful than the original (it still has its moments) but overall the band seem to have matured and their music has benefited from it. Expand
  3. AlexF
    May 27, 2009
    9
    An amazing album which incorporates all the good bits the first album by The Maccabees did not have. There are no songs that let down the An amazing album which incorporates all the good bits the first album by The Maccabees did not have. There are no songs that let down the high quality of this album. What a comback by The Maccabees. Expand
  4. Aug 5, 2013
    9
    While some of these songs are not as youthfully energetic as Colour It In, there are some fantastic tracks that show a different side of TheWhile some of these songs are not as youthfully energetic as Colour It In, there are some fantastic tracks that show a different side of The Maccabees. Out of the songs that strive to be raging rock like Colour, Can You Give It triumphs. With thumping, fuzzy bass, and screaming guitars this song dances between sweet soft verses and rolling choruses. No Kind Words is by far the darkest track The Maccabees have ever done. You can almost feel emptiness in the track with such bare-bones instrumentation until the song descends into dual, crazed guitar lines. The ending track Bag of Bones pt. B may be the greatest song the Maccs have ever done. Stylistically it is nothing like the rest of the tracks on the album, but it accomplishes what a closing song on an album should do. The slow pace this song rolls over, and with interesting guitar work creates a dreamy swirly vibe, and it is something The Maccabees do remarkably well. Expand