Metascore
68

Generally favorable reviews - based on 24 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 16 out of 24
  2. Negative: 1 out of 24
  1. Q Magazine
    20
    There's a sense that he's trying to pass off a lack of ability as some kind of artistic statement. [Aug 2009, p.113]
User Score
6.6

Generally favorable reviews- based on 26 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 18 out of 26
  2. Negative: 5 out of 26
  1. Mar 2, 2018
    1
    This review contains spoilers, click full review link to view. I can't believe Pitchfork had the cheek to rate this 8.1 and feature it in their best new albums section. This is terrible, there is so much distortion and fuzz that it drowns everything in noise. Unfortunately, there isn't much real music to begin with, so hiding it behind a wall of noise is probably considered 'artistic' or 'avant-garde' by the all the hipsters who rated this album highly. Most of the reviews for this album are very positive, which is a f*cking joke if you ask me. In the words of Q magazine (the only magazine to give it a **** rating): 'There's a sense that he's trying to pass off a lack of ability as some kind of artistic statement'.
    1.4
    Full Review »
  2. FerelO
    Apr 6, 2009
    9
    Sure its an uneven album and you may visit the next button more often then you'd like. Overall though the highs are dizzingly high and Sure its an uneven album and you may visit the next button more often then you'd like. Overall though the highs are dizzingly high and the production is beautiful. Full Review »
  3. TonyN
    Mar 22, 2009
    8
    This album is solid. Fuck you, Austin Chronicle!