Charlie's Angels: Season 1

METASCORE

Generally unfavorable reviews based on 22 Critic Reviews

See All

USER SCORE

Generally unfavorable reviews based on 60 Ratings

See All

2.9

VOTE NOW

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

2.9	Your Score
2.9	User Score Generally unfavorable reviews based on 60 Ratings

Would you like to write a review?

There is a 75 character minimum for reviews. If your review contains spoilers, please check the Spoiler box. Please do not use ALL CAPS. There is no linking or other HTML allowed. Your review may be edited for content. 0/5000

Check box if your review contains spoilers

Season Details & Credits

ABC | Season Premiere Date: September 22, 2011

Starring: Ramón Rodríguez, Minka Kelly, Rachael Taylor

Summary: The remake of the 1970s show returns with Kate (Annie Ilonzeh), Eve (Minka Kelly), and Abby (Rachael Taylor) as Charles Townsend's angels.

Creator: Ivan Goff and Ben Roberts

Genre(s): Drama, Action & Adventure

Watch Now

Season 1 Episodes

tbd
S1:E8. They Are Not Saints
Air Date: unknown
tbd
S1:E7. Royal Angels
Air Date: November 10, 2011
tbd
S1:E6. Black Hat Angels
Air Date: November 3, 2011

See all Seasons and Episodes

Metascore

Positive:

Mixed:

Negative:

Critic Reviews

Chris Conaton

Sep 22, 2011

Here everyone, even Bosley, seems interchangeable. Read full review

Matthew Gilbert

Sep 12, 2011

The underwhelming cast brings nothing to the boilerplate action. Kelly is miscast as a biker chick, and making Bosley a hunk with computer skills fails to add life. Read full review

San Jose Mercury News/Contra Costa Times

Chuck Barney

Sep 21, 2011

Unfortunately, no one pops off the screen the way Farrah once did. Read full review

Lori Rackl

Sep 22, 2011

Charlie's Angels is proof that angels exist in hell, because that's where it felt like I was during most of this hourlong drivel. Read full review

Curt Wagner

Sep 22, 2011

Charlie's Angels is as absurd as the original 1976-81 series that launched the careers of Jaclyn Smith, Kate Jackson and Farrah Fawcett (and her hair). Read full review

Uncle Barky Ed Bark

Sep 22, 2011

It leads off the network's Thursday prime-time schedule, with the action originating in Miami and the scripts apparently bought from Godawful, Inc. Read full review

Hank Stuever

Sep 16, 2011

They come off as interchangeable affirmative-action figures who make Farrah and company look like early suffragettes who fought for the jiggle rights we now take for granted. Read full review

SEE ALL 22 REVIEWS

User Score

Write a Review

2.9

Positive:

Mixed:

Negative:

User Reviews

lil

Nov 21, 2012

Brilliant show !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! i can't get enough of this show (y) and okay i wasn't around to watch charlies angels in the late 70 's early 80 's but i have been watching it on watch series and i can see where people are coming from where it's need work but still i think it'sBrilliant show !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! i can't get enough of this show (y) and okay i wasn't around to watch charlies angels in the late 70 's early 80 's but i have been watching it on watch series and i can see where people are coming from where it's need work but still i think it's brilliant we are seeing more into the angels past also i think it's amazing to bring a such an icon show back to inspire people :) i have been inspired by this show now and when it was on when i have watched on watch series :)… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

spacemandave

Sep 27, 2011

wouldnt say it was really a 10 but the show was pretty good....some ass kickin, cheesy lines, sexy women....its not mad men, its charlies angels, i liked it.

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

AndyBeaux

Sep 23, 2011

It could have been better, but it was a good pilot. It was staded on inumerous interviews that this was THEIR version of the classic! Why do critics look for a reason do bash it by comparing it to the original?

0 of 4 users found this helpful04

frelling_cute

Sep 28, 2011

I remember sitting in front of my TV when I was in my early teens and watching the original. Sure the scripts were not always that great but it made up for it with the Beautiful chemistry the Woman had.
Flash forward 35 years and you have evil Producers and writers who want to recapture thatI remember sitting in front of my TV when I was in my early teens and watching the original. Sure the scripts were not always that great but it made up for it with the Beautiful chemistry the Woman had.
Flash forward 35 years and you have evil Producers and writers who want to recapture that magic and they are way off. The script was horrible and the acting was quite cheesy. Putting three Woman together isn't going to carry a show, you need something more and you don't have it here.
Drew should have her hand slapped and so should the Smallville guys who created or should I say rebooted this show.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

Rattazustra

Oct 15, 2011

A long time ago, when there was no internet, young males found it much harder to come upon visual material of attractive females. Those were the times when series like Baywatch became hugely successful. These times are gone and today it is simply not enough to put able bodied females ontoA long time ago, when there was no internet, young males found it much harder to come upon visual material of attractive females. Those were the times when series like Baywatch became hugely successful. These times are gone and today it is simply not enough to put able bodied females onto the screen. Unfortunately, lacking good stories or excellent acting, Charlie's Angels does nothing else, which unfortunately leaves it without any redeeming qualities. Some series better stay dead.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

CritiqueGirl

Sep 25, 2011

The only reason I watched the original was because it was so bad it was good. I don't think this remake can rise to even that level. A balance like that does not come around too often where you can sit with your friends and laugh at all the "action" and "dialogue".

In every scene andThe only reason I watched the original was because it was so bad it was good. I don't think this remake can rise to even that level. A balance like that does not come around too often where you can sit with your friends and laugh at all the "action" and "dialogue".

In every scene and promotional picture I thought I never saw so much ill fitting clothing with poor cut and color selections since Fashion Bug in the 80's. I mean, that is a huge part of the Angel's, what they are wearing.

Take a cue from Burn Notice, on that show clothing, hair, shoes are executed perfectly. I stopped watching Burn Notice after season 2 as I pretty much get it but it still has a strong audience, for cable. This show is most likely to end after 2 seasons if that.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

reasonate

Sep 22, 2011

Wow. This was one of the worst TV shows I've seen in a long time. Painful, overacted dialogue, ridiculous plot, uninteresting characters... I don't think they could have made this show more terrible if they tried. Honestly, it was all I could do to force myself to watch the whole thing.Wow. This was one of the worst TV shows I've seen in a long time. Painful, overacted dialogue, ridiculous plot, uninteresting characters... I don't think they could have made this show more terrible if they tried. Honestly, it was all I could do to force myself to watch the whole thing. It was truly painful to watch.… Expand

7 of 8 users found this helpful71

SEE ALL 22 REVIEWS

Seasons & Episodes

30

Series Overview
Season 1

30
- Season 1 Overview
  Air Date: September 22, 2011
- tbd
  S1:E8. They Are Not Saints
  Air Date: unknown
- tbd
  S1:E7. Royal Angels
  Air Date: November 10, 2011
- tbd
  S1:E6. Black Hat Angels
  Air Date: November 3, 2011
- tbd
  S1:E5. Angels in Paradise
  Air Date: October 20, 2011
- tbd
  S1:E4. Angels in Chains
  Air Date: October 13, 2011
- tbd
  S1:E3. Bon Voyage, Angels
  Air Date: October 6, 2011
- tbd
  S1:E2. Runway Angels
  Air Date: September 29, 2011
- tbd
  S1:E1. Angel With a Broken Wing
  Air Date: September 22, 2011