WWF Royal Rumble Dreamcast

  • Publisher: THQ
  • Release Date: Aug 1, 2000
Metascore
66

Mixed or average reviews - based on 23 Critics

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 6 out of 23
  2. Negative: 4 out of 23
Buy On
  1. There is no way around it, Royal Rumble feels entirely half-assed.
  2. This game is horrible. THQ's long line of successful wrestling games has just gone down the drain. This game was just an overall extremely poor attempt at a game, and a laughable attempt at a wrestling game.
  3. A mediocre effort and use of the license. With only 22 wrestlers and subpar graphics and gameplay, the game should only appeal to desperate Dreamcast owners.
  4. Spank!
    4
    If you've played other wrestling games -- especially "Smackdown" -- you'll find it hard to believe the developers thought they could get away with this.

Awards & Rankings

#23 Most Discussed Dreamcast Game of 2000
User Score
5.6

Mixed or average reviews- based on 7 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 1 out of 4
  2. Negative: 2 out of 4
  1. Jul 24, 2014
    8
    Not bad for what it is. AN ARCADE PORT! Take it for that and not a No Mercy or Wrestlemania 2000, and you can find some pretty good fun andNot bad for what it is. AN ARCADE PORT! Take it for that and not a No Mercy or Wrestlemania 2000, and you can find some pretty good fun and enjoyment out of it. Full Review »
  2. BobS.
    Jul 1, 2002
    2
    This is the worst wrestling game i have ever played. the regular nintendo system made a better wrestling game than this and i don't even This is the worst wrestling game i have ever played. the regular nintendo system made a better wrestling game than this and i don't even remember the name! Full Review »
  3. ChrisB.
    Jan 13, 2002
    3
    This is so bad compared two other games such as Smackdown.