- Publisher: Electronic Arts
- Release Date: Jun 25, 2009
User Score
5.8
out of 10
Mixed or average reviews- based on 55 Ratings
User score distribution:
-
Positive: 26 out of 55
-
Mixed: 8 out of 55
-
Negative: 21 out of 55
Review this game
-
Your Score10 out of 10
-
Please sign in or create an account before writing a review.
-
-
Submit
-
Check Spelling
-
Characters remaining: 5000 out of 5000
- User score
- Most active
- By date
- Most helpful
- Most Clicked
-
VinnyGDec 11, 20092EA are destroying this 'free' game by providing paying customers with 'Uber' weapons. It started as real money for clothes, you could pay to look different. Now - after stating it would never happen - real money gets you stronger weapons... It would have been a score of 8, bad move EA. Play for Free.. Die for Free
-
-
AdenRNov 10, 200910This is essentially just a 3rd person battlefield game. It is for free, there is an awesome class based system for you to build off. For free, this is a great game with alot of value.
-
-
Apr 28, 20116this could have been a good game. the classes are balanced, and there are good vehicles too. but the only problem is that if you dont pay, you dont win. I dont get battlefunds so i get owed all the time. once somebody killed me with one shot on a sniper when it usually takes me 4 or 5 with headshots.
-
Sep 29, 20111There's plenty of better free games out there. Unless you are under the age of about 12, there's no point in even considering this game. TF2, for instance or Crossfire are much better alternatives.
-
EricFJan 13, 20108Its a fun, free little game, although it is very simplistic. Its not a game for the hard core, but if your more of a casual gamer, its definitely worth a try. However, its going to need at least a few more maps, vehicles, and features in general to stay fun, but that's not of any real concern, at least at the moment
-
-
JohnnyR.Oct 20, 20097Fast paced. Lots of action. only 5 maps and games can go quick with skilled players. No lag to speak of with a good connection and PC. As with any game with a chat screen you will find jerks. No problems finding a game and if you are a good player everyone want to be on your friends list.
-
-
AlexRNov 4, 20099
-
-
Nov 1, 20104The gameplay itself could be way better. They have messed up the balance between classes by adding overpowered-only purchasable weapons. "Free to play - pay to win", and they only tell about the free to play part to us.
-
May 16, 20115Bores the heck out of me, combat isn't fluid/nice and at the end of the day this is supposed to be an FPS. Just because it's free doesn't make it good.
-
Jul 20, 20117Battlefield Heroes in a nutshell - Pay if you want an awesome game, don't pay if you want to watch continous killcams. But look on the bright side - at least EA doesn't charge for bullets!
-
Dec 21, 20115
-
Dec 23, 201110
-
Dec 23, 20110Greedy Ea is greedy...
-
Dec 28, 20118
-
Jan 28, 20128
-
Mar 3, 20127A well-packaged, team-based, cartoon FPS and it's free (well mostly)! True casual players or hardcore gamers may not feel entirely welcome though. The main theme to the game is awesome.
-
Apr 23, 20124
prev
next
Page:
- 1
-
79EA DICE presents us a game that comes up with something new concerning the really worn-out issue of war. They have decided to get away from realism und titles like Medal of Honor and Call of Duty. The only negative thing about it is that only online-gamers will have long-term fun clinging to this online game.
-
40The game we've been presented with works against itself more often than it does not.
-
77Without any announcement, Electronic Arts released Battlefield Heroes. Why the secrecy? The free online shooter turns out to be an entertaining game. It's a casual game with almost no tactics to speak of, but it's fast-paced and funny.