- Publisher: Activision
- Release Date: Oct 29, 2003
- Also On: Mobile, PlayStation 3, Xbox 360
User Score
8.5
out of 10
Generally favorable reviews- based on 221 Ratings
User score distribution:
-
Positive: 196 out of 221
-
Mixed: 11 out of 221
-
Negative: 14 out of 221
Review this game
-
Your Score10 out of 10
-
Please sign in or create an account before writing a review.
-
-
Submit
-
Check Spelling
-
Characters remaining: 5000 out of 5000
- User score
- Most active
- By date
- Most helpful
- Most Clicked
-
Jun 8, 201110hey all love call of duty but I need to find the best one rated T or less for the pc is this the best one? please let me know a.s.a.p.
-
JinxterL.Nov 6, 200310This must be the best WW2 shooter ever. It`s not only the graphics and sounds, but also the gameplay is lightyears better than in MOHAA. This game creates very solid atmosphere, all ruined villages, weapons, clothes, voices and action is very close to real thing. If you are WW2 addicted like me, or if you just happen to like fpshooters, get a copy of this jewel. You won`t regret it =)
-
-
AnonymousMCJan 2, 200410
-
-
AnonymousMCJan 3, 20048
-
-
DeaconB.Feb 4, 20046The single play was brilliant, I loved it, but it was way too short. The multiplayer could possibly be good if there was a way to get rid of all the cheating scum.
-
-
JCEApr 20, 20043
-
-
AdrianMay 7, 200710A great game, both Single and Multilayer. The game doesn't need a high-spec PC, and the graphics still look as good as some latest games.
-
-
OwlNov 20, 200310Hands down the best fps ever! Amazingly immersive. It's the closest I ever want to get to being in a war. The Stalingrad levels are simply riveting. When you see the human wave of soviet soldiers rushing onward all around you. You just drop your jaw in disbelief and charge forward. Thank you Infinity Ward for crafting a masterpiece of PC gaming goodness!
-
-
JaniK.Nov 20, 20039Short but rocks like a thunder.
-
-
DavidR.Nov 5, 20037It's a very good game, but, coming after Max Payne 2, I want something more. The entire game feels scripted to death, and a lot of the time is spent just holding down the fire button and waving the mouse wildly. I like it a LOT, but it kinda gives me the sh.ts. If you know what I mean. newfers
-
-
SimbaDec 30, 200310Quite simply the most fun PC game for years.
-
-
IvanV.Oct 31, 20030
-
-
EdwardP.Nov 22, 200410Loss for words...
-
-
LiamJan 16, 200410This game is the best game i have ever played in my life.
-
-
AndrewM.Apr 30, 200410This is the most emence action game i have ever played and i strongly recomend it to everyone.
-
-
GrahamApr 6, 200410I've been playing FPS for 10 years now, and I've never been so impressed and absorbed by any of them. This is a new level in quality of gaming. A work of genius. Enjoy!
-
-
MartijnvandeV.Sep 5, 20047Nice story, good grapics, ok online mode. Bad A.I. and the single-player mode is just to short...
-
-
DionH.Apr 2, 200510Brilliant game from start to finish.
-
-
ChrisApr 26, 200510blooming briliant on multiplayer. Beter that battle field veiatnam. recomend to buy (top notch!!!!)
-
-
JMJun 18, 200510The person who gave this a zero has no soul and is a big D@#$#^&!@# and has never played this game (as goes for all those who don't give this a good score). This game is truly a good single player and an awesome multiplayer. This makes even Allied Assault lokk like crap. This is the Half Life 2 of its time.
-
-
BlazingArrowOct 25, 200610Indeed. Cannot beat the best. It plays on alot of computers, too. Still alive in terms of multiplayer (1300+). DOD and BF1942 suck in terms of realism and true WWII warfare.
-
-
JakeK.Apr 20, 200610I think this is probably one of the best games world war 2 games i have ever played. It beats the medal of honer series by miles. I prey to god that there is going to be a 3rd one. i really want to play the 2nd one but i havent got a chance.
-
-
MikeR.Oct 1, 20077
-
-
JoeM.Nov 27, 200710
-
-
KenS.Mar 24, 200810It is simply the best Multiplayer Game ever. There isn't a game who can even nearly copy the style of it.
-
-
jonvApr 3, 200910For its time it was truly one of the best shooters ever made.
-
-
SamiNov 11, 200310EXCELLENT!!!
-
-
JeroenVanR.Nov 1, 200310This could be one of the best games ever. It is way better than MOH and leaves it far behind. The atmosphere in this game is so good. I'll never play another game this year on my PC. CoD rulez !!!!
-
-
DavidM.Nov 2, 200310Better than counterstrike.
-
-
Jok`RdeMoNov 4, 20037It is sad, that I cant play for Germans. I don't like Russians and I dont wanna play for them :( thats why only 7.
-
-
J.J.Nov 5, 20037Pretty decent game, a little on the short side only 7 hours to beat and that included alot of mucking around. Also there wasn't much of a story line. Also i would have liked to have seen stats after i had beaten the game, enemy's killed, accuracy, dmg given/taken etc..
-
-
PatrickJ.Nov 8, 20039Playing this game you feel like being in the HBO, Band of Brothers series. Graphics and gameplay are very good. When you go back to MOH or Battlefield 1942 you notice these games are outdated, and Call of Duty is the new king of WW2 shooters.
-
-
MichalW.Dec 22, 200310I have finished Call Of Duty today and I must say it's amazing. It's so intense, has so great atmosphere and it's so well done that I just can't believe it! I haven't played DX: Invisible War yet, but among other candidates Call Of Duty seem to be GAME OF THE YEAR for me.
-
-
RichardE.Oct 22, 200310Played it loved it, best shooter to date, better than medal of honor by far!
-
-
MatthewF.Dec 30, 200310Absolutley amazing! Never have I been so impressed with a FPS in my life. I recommend this game to anyone, and the multiplayer mode is best of the year for sure.
-
-
MikePOct 31, 200310LOL Ivan are you one of those Russian judges, Hahahah cause your name fits that rather well, get off your high horse this game hands down owned and that's the bottom line. Makes me laugh the same guys made this as they did MOHAA.
-
-
ADFOct 31, 20039Um, MOHAA is a laugh compared to this
-
-
ChuluungomboOct 10, 20040
-
-
ChimpJan 19, 200410
-
-
JaysonPaulZ.Jan 4, 20049The best FPS game that i played since MOHAA i cant wait for the sequel, but hey wait where is the expansion?
-
-
MonkeyWeaselJan 5, 200410This is a great game with fun weapons and great single player action but if you want a good multyplayer nothing beats battlefield 1942.
-
-
JoshO.Feb 14, 200410An excellent action game that sweeps you up and keeps you inthrolled in the intesne world of 1944
-
-
SethFeb 25, 20049Incredible....absolutely unbelievable. one of the most graphically astonishing games of its time. and if you think its too short, your wrong, if you are bored yet, play a different difficulty or somthing. wow
-
-
WillS.Mar 21, 20046
-
-
RogerDodgerMay 6, 20041What a piece of crap! This game never worked on gaming P/C (Athalon 2500+ ATI 9200, 1GB RAM, 80GB W/D). Contacted Activision for support and never replied. Called, put on hold then hung up on TWICE. Don't waste your time.
-
-
MattG.Sep 16, 20047The game is good no doubt....but the problem is that it's to LINEAR! Plus the MP sucks.
-
-
MikeAug 2, 20054In all honesty, I can't see what all the fuss is about. For the most part, it feels almost precisely like any old arcade shooter.
-
-
MikkoV.Sep 29, 200610Just brilliant. No more rambo WW2 games like Call of duty. Ai is good, so is the graphics and sounds. Story is just marvelous.
-
-
ThomasP.Jan 4, 200710This game is freakin awesome and for some reason runs way smoother on my PC than Counter-Strike 1.6! and the graphics are go good and it doesn't require much to play it, 10.
-
-
BeatifulM.Mar 23, 200710This game is one of the best WW2 Shooter Games I have ever played! Respect Activision!
-
-
[anonymous]Oct 10, 200810It didn't bring much new to the table out-of-the-box, but it did perfect the PC (arcade-influenced) shooter.
-
-
TheOutsiderNov 10, 200310Amazing! This game is the most addictive game since Counter Strike. The graphics are good, the sonds are amazing the story is ok but the fun and frantic gameplay makes up for the lack thereof. The excitement is awesome, the action never seems to stop. A great game, definitely worth the money.
-
-
DaveN.Nov 10, 20037Fun game, but not the end-all be-all that everyone is making it out to be. The whole thing is over in about 6 hours for one thing. More than half of the levels are just going room to room killing guys who are standing around waiting for you to get there. There are some great levels, but the game on the whole is only so-so.
-
-
MiikaAli-V.Nov 14, 200310BEST.
-
-
ClaudioOlivastriNov 16, 20039The best fps pf this year, the only defect is that it is a very short game. it takes only 10 or 12 hours to finish it.
-
-
MatthieuR.Nov 24, 20039
-
-
ZackO.Nov 29, 200310Wow what a great game. Perhaps this is the best WWII game ever to be made. Its like being inside the show Band of Brothers, with bullets and artillery whooshing past you and seeing your buddies get shot evrywhere. Single Player is awesome, but what makes it spectacular is the Addictive multiplayer. Once i log on to a server, ill stay on for hours.
-
-
GuidoL.Nov 30, 20035Don't believe the hype! The Sp is extremely short while the Mp is ridiculous due to the suckers who like to jump like bunnies to avoid the bullets they deserve. It lacks realism and it's not worth ur money.
-
-
ALEXJ.Nov 3, 200310COD ROXXX. BEST GAME OF 2003!=)
-
-
JohnM.Nov 6, 20038It is somewhere in between MOHAA and BF1942. Very action packed with fantastic graphics and sound. It is not as scripted as MOHAA, but that is not to say it is a free for all like Battlefield. I was hoping for more flexibility - why can't I steal a tank?!
-
-
GeoffS.Oct 18, 200310I just got done playing the demo and all I can say is WOW!!! This game is one of the best shooters I have played in a long time. Man I can't wait until it comes out.
-
-
MariaT.Dec 1, 200310
-
-
NealG.Dec 16, 20039
-
-
RobR.Dec 4, 20038Call of Duty's single-player campaign was the most intense gaming experience I'd ever had on the PC. Unfortunately it is disappointingly short (I completed it in about 2 days) and the multiplay is lackluster. The game looks and plays beautifully, and is a truly immersive and has an awesome cinematic feel. In my book, CoD is the equivalent of a couple "Band of Brothers" episodes.
-
-
MivanM.Oct 31, 200310Ivan V. You are a moron. The team that created MOHAA is the same team that wrote this game. It is the best without doubt. You are an idiot and suck at the internet. Get a life! THIS GAME ROCKS ASS!!!!!!!! L33T GAME OF DA YEAR!!!!!!! BAR NONE. It is f-ing awesome!!!!!!!!!
-
-
CapaOct 31, 200310Don't listen to the poster here who gave it a 0. This game trounces MOH in every aspect. Do yourself a favor and gop get this now. You won't regret it...trust me! MOH is a great game, but COD surpsasses it in every way...including graphics. C
-
-
JedR.Oct 31, 200310
-
-
ChrisT.Jan 24, 20046I still like MOH:AA better, the movement and feeling is more realistic. What makes COD excelent is its sound and graphics, but still I don't feel as good as mohaa, I passed the stalingrad level, that's the only level I felt intense, before and after that just shallow and boring feeling.
-
-
AnonymousMCFeb 22, 20044After further online play I'd have to revise my score and give it a 4. If the multiplayer wasn't so horrible and nasty, and the singleplayer hadn't been so extreemly short, it would have scored higher. People who like WWII FPSs would do MUCH better to go out and buy Battlefield 1942.
-
-
AnonymousMCOct 17, 20059
-
-
CharlieX.Jan 28, 200510One of the most intense and realistic FPS games in PC history I have ever played. A true work of art from Infinity Ward and I hope that other game developers follow this game's example, even if there are a few flaws here and there. The Quake engine for its graphics may seem outdated but I like to use the term "classic".
-
-
VinceB.Feb 26, 200510I love Cod the single greatest game ever cant wait for Cod2 in August of 2005.
-
-
CharlieW.Jul 31, 200510Freaking amazing. I was shaking for hours first time i played it.
-
-
KasperB.Dec 21, 20069This one hell of a shooter. Addictive. When you start it is hard to stop. Always a good sign for a game.
-
-
S.SniperNov 13, 20039A good game, better than MOHAA. It's one of the better WW2 shooters I've played. It's like Return To Castle Wolfenstein, only the story-line isn't as intense. But overall a good peice.
-
-
ClintR.Nov 16, 200310I love this game it is awesome. I would suggest buying it if you don't already have it. Great game worth the money I spent on it :) NONE :)
-
-
JoeNov 17, 20035
-
-
MedicJ.Nov 18, 200310
-
-
[Anonymous]Nov 22, 200310Phenomenal.
-
-
IzZoNov 29, 20039
-
-
AnonymousMCDec 16, 20038
-
-
BitBurnDec 17, 20038Sweeeet!!!! Excellent game.
-
-
FredM.Dec 31, 20038Single player is amazing. One of the most immersive WWII experiences ever created. The multiplayer sucks shaft. Bunnie hopping idiots, and small maps, make it kind of weak. For those of you that think this is a good multiplayer game....you have obviously never played Black Hawk Down.
-
-
V-ManDec 19, 20068A brilliant mix of everything you would ever want from a world war 2 game. The only thing I found lacking was mored multipalyer modes and it was missing a good D-Day mission, otherwise this game would've been perfect.
-
-
AlexanderV.Dec 22, 200610Great for on-line multiplayer, good graphics and above all phenominal gameplay make this game a classic. It has also enjoyed considerable success at major international LAN events (which is more than can be said for its successor, Call of Duty 2).
-
-
Dec 30, 20119One of the best FPS games in the world war especially for the teen player. Good graphics, gameplay, sound, music, story and of course... less blood. No other COD game would most likely to own this one.
-
Jan 11, 20118
-
Dec 1, 20116It's an ok shooter. I found it to be a cross between Return to Castle Wolfenstein and Medal of Honor: Allied Assault, both of which provided a much better gameplay experience. Fighting as the Russians was the highlight of CoD which provided a hint of originality. Beyond that, there was nothing that jumped out as an experience worth remembering.
-
Oct 20, 20117I remember when this was the best graphics and gameplay ... Almost started crying when i saw the old details. I really love this game. But i think the new games are lowsey, and only a money machine. -Anders
-
Jul 17, 20119
-
Nov 2, 20119
-
May 14, 20122Single player is rubbish. Multiplayer is rubbish. Graphics for 2003 game: oh my god how bad they are. Half life 2 and Doom 3 came half year later, look their graphics. So: sp 2/10 mp 2/10 graphics: 1/10 sound 2/10 musics 5/10 Sorry CoD fans.
-
Dec 10, 201110
-
Dec 22, 20116Smooth controls, animations and gameplay are the good things about this game. Bad things- multiplayer is without substance and non cheaters. Single player got so boring I literally forced myself through it. A waste of time. If you want a WWII shooter CoD2 or BF1942 are the way to go.
-
Feb 28, 20129
-
May 16, 20129Call of Duty is a solid game, and with some great graphics. Even if this game is old, I was amaze by the graphics. It is with a fun campaign, and with a great multiplayer. It just needed to have a better story. (9.4)
-
May 18, 20128Comical to play your friend in a map and pwn him all day. The re-play value was there, the maps were more comical than good, and this was a must have back in the day. Call of Duty 3 is another story, but this game was one of my first shooters that allowed you to kill and die 100 times in 5 minutes. lol
prev
next
Page:
- 1
-
90However, taking away all the glamour, polish and hype this title has, what youll be presented with is rather linear game with fairly limited replay ability. We did however find the single player campaigns surprisingly short.
-
Call of Duty is going to turn heads. It looks amazing, the action is fierce, and the multiplayer game is balanced, with plenty of diverse settings. [Jan 2004, p.58]
-
97The most intensive war action first person shooter combat title yet. I have not played a single-player experience that is as immersive and intense as the one in Call of Duty.