Metascore
58

Mixed or average reviews - based on 22 Critics

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 3 out of 22
  2. Negative: 7 out of 22
Buy On
  1. No one in their right mind should bother playing this game. There are so many better alternatives out there right now.
  2. PC Gamer
    46
    Gore's single-player game shoots way over par. [Sept 2002, p.80]
  3. The title tosses in a generic story and characters in senseless gameplay.
  4. 40
    If you’re looking for a single-player experience that rivals most of today’s other RTS games… look elsewhere.
  5. 40
    Suffers from outdated technology being applied to a game design that doesn't really know what it wants to be.
  6. Suffering from technical issues, ugly graphics, and uninspired gameplay Gore is destined to be soon forgotten in the annals of shooters.
  7. Computer Gaming World
    20
    Poor graphics, unbalanced weapons, and tired level design can't begin to help this game. [Sept 2002, p.90]
User Score
7.4

Mixed or average reviews- based on 5 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 3 out of 5
  2. Mixed: 0 out of 5
  3. Negative: 2 out of 5
  1. Oct 17, 2013
    9
    Even the singleplayer is fun to play. Especially later on in the game when you visit the cathedral or the cemetery with the skeletons with theEven the singleplayer is fun to play. Especially later on in the game when you visit the cathedral or the cemetery with the skeletons with the chainsaws. Then it even gets scary. Full Review »
  2. Mar 12, 2011
    4
    bad game...
  3. Toxisches_ei
    Oct 27, 2002
    10
    I don't know why everybody is complaining about Gore. It's one of the best multiplayer games available with a lot of fast paced I don't know why everybody is complaining about Gore. It's one of the best multiplayer games available with a lot of fast paced action and of course fun :) Full Review »