- Publisher: THQ
- Release Date: Apr 9, 2003
- Also On: PlayStation 2
User Score
5.3
out of 10
Mixed or average reviews- based on 36 Ratings
User score distribution:
-
Positive: 11 out of 36
-
Mixed: 10 out of 36
-
Negative: 15 out of 36
Review this game
-
-
Please sign in or create an account before writing a review.
-
-
Submit
-
Check Spelling
- User score
- Most active
- By date
- Most helpful
- Most Clicked
-
EdThaJun 8, 20039Great game... It gets together, the good things of almost every fps, ands adds interaction with teh sorroundings...
-
-
MichaelA.May 10, 200710One of the best if not the best first person shooters ever made. Multiplayer is amazing along with great 1 player mode. 10 out of 10.
-
-
J.W.Aug 21, 200310This game is awesome, I have it on my PS2, my friend has it on his PS2, I play it every time I go to his house, he plays it every time he comes to my house. How can the PC version be worse if it came out at a later date? You're all CRAZY!!!
-
-
May 7, 201110
-
KelemvorMar 7, 20055A bad console-port. The graphic is mediocre at best, you cannot save, there are only checkpoints on really dumb places, and the story is boring to. If you develop games for a console, please don't martyr the pc-community with such crappy ports.
-
-
MormoMay 3, 20064After the 2 first level, ends up to predictive and boring.
-
-
BenAug 9, 20090Blew through it in 3 hours, visually poor and lacking any substance whatsoever. Loads of weapons but the game was so quick I didn't use half of em. The story is horrible and has no link to the original characters and barely mentions the Red Faction (which is now a political group or something). Do not buy this game.
-
-
JoeS.Mar 24, 20036Why would you buy this game and not any other FPS in the universe? Well its because of the GeoMod Technology right? Its the only game that has it right? Well this "new and revamped" geomod is non existant. All of the walls are "invincible" and I have not seen geomod throughout the game. If you want real geomod then buy the original RedFaction.
-
-
SirJPMay 23, 20031Buggy, unplayable, boring... It's lag on my GeForce4 Ti at 640x400!!!
-
-
EliasO.Oct 8, 20063It's a real bad console port, it's very tedious to play, and most of the time you're so frustrated by the awkard things that just kept happening while playing. I had to reload way too many times. When I need to reload becouse I died in a game, thats fine, I just try to refine my strategy. but when I need to reload becouse the game is acting up, thats just bad.
-
-
JohnSAug 13, 20094Not worth a buy. Hardly ties into the 1st one, which was awesome for its time. To reply to J.W. - PC gamers tend to have pretty high standards when it comes to shooters, since shooters are like the PC's bread and butter. When a good console game gets badly ported over, it only irks us more.
-
-
TerryD.Apr 18, 20034
-
-
ScottR.Nov 2, 20046This game would be way better with online multiplayer!
-
-
PLSep 21, 20091This game is horrible graphically if you have played Half Life, Left 4 Dead, or Far Cry to name a few. I felt like I was playing Castle Wolfenstein during the 1980's.
-
-
Feb 23, 20121This game is terrible. The game is short. The maps are obtuse. The plot is generic and stupid. The enemies are either bullet sponges OR they are hidden around every corner and hit you almost immediately after you see them. The worst part of this game is how unsatisfying the guns are. I play FPS games to shoot things, and the shooting in this game is AWFUL.
-
Jan 22, 20132
-
65For those of you who are online multiplayer fans though, an offline botmatch may just be seen as unacceptable … and that’s what you get with RFII. That’s a shame since the first one was fantastic.
-
55Short is never good, no matter which context you put it in. And this game is short. It's penis-envy short. It's the shortest single-player FPS game I've ever played. A four hour gameplay experience for a retail product is like a 20 second sexual intercourse. It just doesn't feel right, and you feel cheated.
-
74Fun, certainly, but single-player is a bit too linear and bit too short, even if the combat is engaging, well-thought out, and generally intense.