The Kings' Crusade PC
Metascore
71 out of 100

Mixed or average reviews - based on 12 Critics

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 7 out of 12
  2. Mixed: 5 out of 12
  3. Negative: 0 out of 12
view
per page
  1. IncGamers
    87
    The lustre of this combination has dulled a little with familiarity, but it still provides a gaming experience that few other titles offer.
  2. Strategy Informer
    85
    But what could easily become an overburdening mess of a structure is cleverly handled by the developer, and Lionheart is engaging as a result.
  3. LEVEL (Czech Republic)
    Dec 20, 2010
    80
    Highly addictive historical strategy game offers hours and hours of fun thanks to its polished combat system, PRG elements and uncommon concept. [Dec 2010]
    All this publication's reviews
  4. Computer Games Online RO
    Dec 20, 2010
    78
    We still have a decent title on our hands, with two sides different enough to warrant a replay of the single-player campaign, a well-designed economic system and a factions / research tree which can seal the deal.
  5. GameShark
    Dec 20, 2010
    75
    Lionheart remains appealing throughout because of how well it captures the period. It's not a perfect historical representation, of course, but it puts you in the seat of two all-conquering medieval heroes.
  6. GameSpot
    Oct 24, 2010
    75
    Combining a serious focus on battlefield tactics with some enjoyable role playing makes Lionheart: Kings' Crusade a winner.
  7. GameZone
    75
    Lionheart: King's Crusade is all the fun of battling heathens and crushing homelands, but without those pesky plagues.
  8. GamingXP
    Oct 25, 2010
    71
    Generally, Lionheart Kings' Crusade is a nice game; however, it lacks strategy and action in the battles.
  9. Multiplayer.it
    Dec 27, 2010
    70
    A good strategy game which suffers the presence of other great alternatives that came out during this year, and It's not able to stand out on any aspect.
  10. Gaming Nexus
    Dec 20, 2010
    67
    Standard game mechanics are well-integrated to produce a solid game. RPG and RTS elements are combined into an enjoyable experience. Not great, but not bad, either. Competent.
  11. Absolute Games
    Jan 3, 2011
    65
    Mildly realistic combat and addictive RPG elements put Lionheart above Crusaders and XIII Century. Unfortunately, the lack of a strategic mode and technical glitches are serious turn-offs that won't stop only the hardened fans of the Crusades epoch.
  12. IGN
    Dec 20, 2010
    50
    But there's one problem, and it's a big one: the game has been out for roughly one month at this point and Neocore still hasn't addressed critical crash errors that severely impact the experience.

User Reviews

All reviews »
User Score
6.3 out of 10

Mixed or average reviews- based on 12 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 3 out of 7
  2. Mixed: 1 out of 7
  3. Negative: 3 out of 7
  1. rwh1
    7
    I sumitted a review back on August 30th, but didn't set my score correctly. I meant to give it a 7. Overall I liked the game play but felt it deserved to lose some points because at higher graphics settings(med - high) the game frequently crashes at the end of battles before the user is given a chance to save their progress. Still, on the lower graphics settings, the battles and game play are fun and the game is mostly stable.… Full Review »
  2. worker11811
    4
    The controls are easy and the game is a good Total War-like clone where you manage your army in combat. You basically take over territories without retribution. I somewhat expected the Saracens to attempt to reconquer lost territory, but they never did. Also, your inventory is limited in size, so you have to distribute your items or sell them to see them all. There is no inventory scrolling if you have too many items.

    Overall, I found the game as fun and like a quick map diversion ---- until I got to the very last campaign.

    As rwh1 states, it crashes. The game played almost perfectly, until the end. I would very much like to play the final fight in Baghdad, but it will not let me finish. I bust through the first walls, the game loads the second part (where you must bust the second layer of walls) and within a few minutes, you get the generic crash message. The game was fun up to that point. I wanted to see the ending, but now I am frustrated. I tried updated video and bios, but get the same result. It's been 2 years since the last patch update and I will not buy DLC as this bug made the game un-enjoyable for finishing. I will also mention that I purchased the game on Steam. I do not think that matters as they patch with the latest updates, too. But it isn't pleasant to get to the end of a game - only to be plagued with a crash and no support.

    If you want, try it out from bargain bin - avoid DLC unless you get them as part of bargain. If the game will play to finish for you, you are more fortunate than my experience. I seem many complaints on the Steam forums - but I was fortunate, until the end. I may try the 5th time to finish this game, but maybe I'll go try King Arthur or XIII Century. It is good when it is working. The path (French, Holy Roman, Templar or Papal) you choose is interesting and so is the side-quests. Also, upgrading units with relics or weapon/armor/potions is a good touch. If you enjoy the combat phase of Total War, you might enjoy this ---- provided it won't crash.

    Crashing - 0 points
    Fun when it works - 10 points    … Full Review »
  3. Tyhcus
    6
    Well designed, technically proficient, but very boring after Total War... it's like the worst parts - very boring combat AI and overly simple battles + street fighting .

    But for all its faults it's well done    … Full Review »
See all user reviews »