- Publisher: SCEA
- Release Date: Nov 2, 2004
User Score
Mixed or average reviews- based on 269 Ratings
User score distribution:
-
Positive: 160 out of 269
-
Mixed: 66 out of 269
-
Negative: 43 out of 269
Review this game
-
-
Please sign in or create an account before writing a review.
-
-
Submit
-
Check Spelling
- User score
- By date
- Most helpful
-
Sep 26, 2015
-
Oct 27, 2012
-
Dec 27, 2011
-
Dec 24, 2016The game is very very ... very bad, bad gameplay with poorly done animations that deform the modeling or the script of assassination that sometimes does not execute the animation correctly, It is difficult to point out the constructions are very bad, and its history is like a movie Of class z, The multiplayer is more of the same, It is painful that something like this came from sony.
-
MickR.Dec 8, 2004Graphical glitches abound, this game is more frustrating than fun, your ai teammates would shoot themselves before shooting the enemy, they always seem to be standing behind u! sum very yucky slowdown and texture pop. why of why did sony release this at a time wen computer games are actually good eg halo 2 , half life 2.??? a poor effort
-
-
J.M.Jun 14, 2005
-
-
JohnS.Nov 4, 2004Absolute rubbish. Overhyped and not worthy to be mentioned in the same breath as classics like Halo.
-
-
MattNov 5, 2004
-
-
RichardC.Nov 5, 2004Lag every good damn second...
-
-
JaycenA'mourDec 1, 2004Awful! Sony tried to fool everyone into thinking this might be a game worth looking at by calling it "Halo Killer" but it ain't even a E.T.(Atari) killer!!! They even copied Halo 2's limited edition tin box but couldn't hide the monkey poo hiding inside!
-
-
JonnyStuddDec 10, 2004Graphics r great ! gameplay drags ! very linear and repetitive, fun for about half an hour, and its not even that difficult ( even on the hard setting ).
-
-
Joker72440Dec 15, 2004I'v played Killzone and halo 2 and I must say, halo 2 is way better than killzone, in everway possible. Those people who say killzone is a "halo2 killer" are f@#*ed in the head. They must be on some thing. And just for the record, Xbox is a way better system than PS2, both with the online play and off.
-
-
JumommaE.Nov 19, 2004Quickly becoming the most overhyped failure of the year. Linear, poor online, bad frame rate, better games out there.
-
-
MikeRDec 2, 2004I really wanted this game to beat Halo. This was the game that was supposed to make throw my Xbox out and buy instead. But it fails in almost every way. Jerky and glitchy, the online mode honestly sucks. The single player is ok, but Halo is miles beyond it. Visually the graphics are impressive, but the PS2 is just too weak to handle it. Dont waste your money, buy a quality game instead.
-
-
GhostbuddyApr 18, 2008
-
-
SteveW.Dec 21, 2004
-
Awards & Rankings
5
|
#5 Most Discussed PS2 Game of 2004
|
2
|
#2 Most Shared PS2 Game of 2004
|
-
The innovative controls for the sniper rifle don't allow the player to pull off precise headshots when they're needed most, which leads to rising frustration.
-
If the gameplay matched the atmosphere, Killzone would be a real winner.
-
PSM MagazineKillzone was worth the wait, and matches the hype. It hits the mark in so many ways, it's baffling; they promised us we'd experience fugture war, and we have...and come away shaking. [Holiday 2004, p.70]