User Score
6.9
out of 10
Mixed or average reviews- based on 82 Ratings
User score distribution:
-
Positive: 55 out of 82
-
Mixed: 11 out of 82
-
Negative: 16 out of 82
Review this game
-
-
Please sign in or create an account before writing a review.
-
-
Submit
-
Check Spelling
-
Dec 26, 20124
-
Nov 28, 20120
-
Apr 24, 20123Less fun than SSX 3, technically poor and the most important think : no offline multiplayer !
Many uselees gameplay futur feature (cold avalanche ice ...)
This game is very hard.
Very good OST.
SSX 4 must be better -
Mar 7, 20122
-
Mar 5, 20120this game would be okay if it wasn't called SSX, a lot of the things SSX was known for have been removed and the menu interface is just a mess.
-
Mar 4, 20124
-
Feb 28, 20120This game is garbage. You can literally win a game by not touching the controller! You have to actually TRY to crash or fail. This game is a testament to the hand holding in modern console games.
Go search Youtube for "SSX no controller" to see what I am talking about. -
Feb 28, 20124
-
May 4, 201280SSX is a great reboot of the series. While the game has some shortcomings, it does provide an amazing adrenaline rush and sense of speed you rarely experience in other titles.
-
Apr 11, 201270[P]layers won't get much out of SSX until they put a lot of time into each of the game's courses – packed with branching paths, high ridges, and suicide leaps – and work out a custom plan of attack. Without one, SSX can deteriorate into a discombobulating frazzle of questions like: where am I going? Is this the fastest way down? And how come the CPU is 15 seconds ahead of me? While the required exploration means a tonne of replay value, it also means newbies will have to board up a hockey stick-shaped difficulty curve to feel in the game. [April 2012, p70]
-
Mar 28, 201245Frustrates and infuriates as poor design decisions smash into each other with alarming regularity. A real letdown, given the series it comes from, but in actuality this is as close to an SSX game as it is Tetris. [Issue#216, p.70]