User Score
4.5

Generally unfavorable reviews- based on 38 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 16 out of 38
  2. Negative: 16 out of 38

Review this game

  1. Your Score
    0 out of 10
    Rate this:
    • 10
    • 9
    • 8
    • 7
    • 6
    • 5
    • 4
    • 3
    • 2
    • 1
    • 0
    • 0
  1. Submit
  2. Check Spelling
  1. Aug 23, 2011
    4
    Same game, same game, same game. Black ops has run it's course. Enough already. I cant play with other people on-line, because i have no time to devote to playing zombies so the whole time i play all i hear is how bad iam at this game. I wish treyarch would consider this when making games and by yourself you cant get past the forth round, would love to see whats past level 4 or 5.
  2. Nov 10, 2011
    2
    dont get me wrong i liked black ops alot, but a 15 dollar download for only zombie maps? thats terrible even if they were new, but these were a bunch of rehashes
  3. Sep 8, 2011
    0
    WOW what a ...... **** game , first the graphics are disgraceful the guns look and sound plastic the overall layout and feel of the game is just terrible, once again its just becoming an arcade shooter that just rips people off, plus they bring out map packs for a joke of a price
  4. Sep 22, 2011
    0
    Zombies were a fun idea, but early on went off the rails. I only have one complain, zombies are not for the casual gamer. In this day and age, leaving out the ability to adjust the difficulty is moronic. Making so much content vitally unplayable solo is equally stupid. Zombie maps from World at War were easily playable solo, making the even more fun co-op. Maps were easily explored withoutZombies were a fun idea, but early on went off the rails. I only have one complain, zombies are not for the casual gamer. In this day and age, leaving out the ability to adjust the difficulty is moronic. Making so much content vitally unplayable solo is equally stupid. Zombie maps from World at War were easily playable solo, making the even more fun co-op. Maps were easily explored without hours and hours of game play. Resent maps I've never fully seen, and never mind following the story. After the big budget Romero turd I vowed never to waste another dime on zombie DLC. Look game developers, sometimes you just want some mindless distraction, sometimes you want to learn the levels before ramping up the difficulty, sometimes you want to play with friends that don't have elite skills, and the ability to adjust the difficulty allows for this. To leave this feature out screws gamers, and in the end screws you too... Expand
Metascore
70

Mixed or average reviews - based on 7 Critics

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 3 out of 7
  2. Negative: 0 out of 7
  1. Moon is a clever zombie map fraught with panic and drama - something which CoDBLOPS already has in ample supply. Bluntly put, a rip-off.
  2. Sep 9, 2011
    70
    If you played World at War, you probably know four of the new maps, with "Moon" being the only new addition. Rezurrection map pack makes its money worth only if you are a fan of the zombie mode.
  3. Sep 2, 2011
    85
    Moon is a tough map, but the hardest thing about it may be deciding to buy it. There are two categories of Call of Duty players who shouldn't buy this map pack: those who loathe zombie mode and those who love it so much they bought the Hardened or Prestige edition of Black Ops. Hardened and Prestige owners, already fixed up with the remastered World at War zombie maps from day one, get the new content - Moon, wallpaper and soundtrack - for free. Standard-edition players who most often compete in multiplayer modes, yet occasionally enjoy a night of zombie-slaying mayhem, might be happy sitting pat; there are no new competitive multiplayer maps in Rezurrection. Moon is a true intrigue, and the package is nicely complete, but when you get right down to it, from a pure gaming stance, it costs 1,200 MS points for one map.