- Publisher: Microsoft Game Studios
- Release Date: Nov 7, 2006
- Also On: PC
User Score
8.3
out of 10
Generally favorable reviews- based on 1841 Ratings
User score distribution:
-
Positive: 1,548 out of 1841
-
Mixed: 83 out of 1841
-
Negative: 210 out of 1841
Review this game
-
-
Please sign in or create an account before writing a review.
-
-
Submit
-
Check Spelling
- User score
- Most active
- By date
- Most helpful
- Most Clicked
-
GuyWithGoodTasteMay 10, 20083
-
-
BobJ.Nov 8, 20063This game has been so overhyped that reviewers feel compelled to give it a good score. Excellent texturing, solid presentation. Poor, repetitive desgin with little innovation. If you are expecting a classic you will be disappointed. It is as formulaic as they come.
-
-
70bucksWastedNov 8, 2006170 bucks down the drain. I finished the game in 5 hours and since I don't have online it's practically worthless to me now. it was fun while it lasted but not challenging and waaaaaay too short. The shortest game I've ever played in my life. Bloody EB won't give me my cash back eitehr, only trade in.... sigh
-
-
ExosusDec 2, 20074
-
-
MarcStaalJan 4, 20070
-
-
NickC.Feb 24, 20073Kinda interesting, for the first few acts 1,2. Later it get boring and boring. And then you get to fight the final boss which is so easy. Then you play multiplayer and then it gets boring because there are 3 game modes. I gave it a 3 because the graphics and the characters and co-op. But in theory GoW sucks as a team-based shooter.
-
-
SteveF.Mar 19, 20074Sure, it looks and sounds great, but that's only skin deep. The core cover mechanic is repetitive, cumbersome and unoriginal (you're basically playing Killswitch 2), the plot is terrible and the AI seems lobotomised. Mulitplayer is fairly fun for a while but dragged down by glitches, limited modes and the same repetition of that cover mechanic.
-
-
ColinG.Jul 8, 20073
-
-
CamJ.Sep 14, 20073
-
-
NevilleS.Jan 30, 20080
-
-
JeffB.Feb 6, 20081
-
-
SteveM.Nov 14, 20064
-
-
ProspectiveK.Nov 24, 20062
-
-
TankS.Nov 8, 20062Thoroughly average. Tried and tested game formula is finally getting tiring. All the separate components are nice; graphics, music but is just held back by such repetitive gameplay. I could play this again for an hour and not need to play more.
-
-
JohnM.Dec 13, 20064
-
-
AlexC.Dec 16, 20061
-
-
HuevosBueyDec 20, 20064
-
-
AnonymousMCDec 27, 20060
-
-
DanielF.Dec 9, 20061The most over-rated game ever. The only thing good about it are the graphics, but that doesn't solely make the game amazing does it? Terrible.
-
-
ShawnO.Jan 3, 20070Crap game, my son played it and started to pretent to use a chainsaw and blood coming out.....I don't know why you would have the chainsaw (I saw it) in this game with all of the blood squishing out.....There are some weird games out there (ex-gory chainsaws) and I think the creator of that had some problems
-
-
DarrenMossJan 5, 20071
-
-
RichardS.Apr 21, 20073
-
-
WhatajokeofaGameMay 16, 20073
-
-
RicardoJul 4, 20070
-
-
AGSep 16, 20070Overrated. Gory. They should have called it Gears of Crap. In fact, this is such a stupid game it barely deserves any more words.
-
-
JustinFeb 11, 20082I stopped playing within the first 10 minutes because: 1. The "training mission" that might as well have never existed 2. The very clumsy controls 3. Most importantly, the lighting that made the game almost painful to look at. I didn't even get to what some have described as a lame story/weapons selection/dialogue/etc. Save your money; go buy the Orange Box or COD4.
-
-
MasterChiefDec 14, 20090This game is nothing compared to the adrenaline fueled graphics bomb we all know as Halo 3. Halo 3 is the only thing on the 360, if you want games like this, buy a Wii. Cause Wii is great for these casual games.
-
-
JackieBJan 4, 20094
-
-
nickJan 5, 20090
-
-
BryanM.Nov 15, 20064It is way too overhyped! It is not that good its just a shooting game that you just hide behind walls and other stuff most of the time, but if you like Ghost Recon, this is your game!
-
-
CliffB.Nov 15, 20064
-
-
CodyW.Nov 28, 20064
-
-
RalphX.Dec 12, 20060
-
-
TimmyThompsonDec 12, 20063
-
-
MauricioG.Dec 13, 20064I Must Agree with Daniel, the expectations was so big that everyone make a big over-rated. This game is ridiculous in size. In one day I Finish!! The gameplay and looking remind a lot of BLACK on the PS2. The main aspect of the gears of war is the paintball style of play. Rent before buy and you will save a bucks...
-
-
JoeB.Jan 18, 20070Not a great game like everyone says. Way too short. Online play isn't too good. This game gets a 0 because of the over-hype!
-
-
JohnS.Jan 19, 20071
-
-
MessiahLeeDec 13, 20070
-
-
KevinE.Jan 27, 20071To be honest I enjoyed the game...really I DID but then after my 6th go around it started to remind me of doom 3 and HL2. What really let me down is that the controls were hard to get used to and the AI sucked (not alot but enough to make me hate).
-
-
StorageBoxJun 14, 20074I didn
-
-
RickyM.Jul 26, 20074
-
-
GeraldS.Sep 13, 20074
-
-
MaxD.Sep 22, 20071This game sucks. the story sucks, the game is incredibly easy becuse the enemies are all basicly the same. the worst part was the acual gameplay, which seems fun and inventive... for the first five minutes. Once youv'e played the first level, you might as well have beat the game.
-
-
TomEdwardsDec 8, 20081The feeling i get from this is that, they could have done this by DLC. It feels like gears 1.5 instead of a full fledged, which is no bad thing because it's gears, but i feel as though i'm being ripped off by something that should have been a bit cheaper.
-
-
MichaelMonesMar 22, 20083Sure its got some amazing graphics, but this isnt anything i havent played before. Throw in extremely linear, one dimensional gameplay, zero exposition , and a messy control scheme, and what you get is an terribly overrated piece of garbage. Its very hard to believe this recieved such high ratings- i smell a payoff.
-
-
andrewjohnsonNov 17, 20060frist off im not a big first shooter fan anyway but wanted to try this game becuase it was hyped and theres not many good games for the 360 yet. the game has great graffics but it still dosent challenge the player in new and fun ways. just mindless shooting and nothing else.
-
-
JohnS.Nov 27, 20062
-
-
Sep 15, 20100This GAME IS FULL OF S%#T, go rot in hell. All you xbox 360 fanboys look like Marcus's screwed up wife! So yeah I h8 this game so that's it I am going to say and I did this so xbox 360 will be gone.
-
Dec 5, 20104
-
Dec 5, 20100
-
Apr 13, 20111
-
Sep 26, 20113
-
Dec 2, 20114One of the most overrated game I've ever played. There is fun to be had here but it's tough to enjoy with the truly awful A.I and tedious gameplay. At release, it had great multiplayer which was unfortunately full of bugs and connection issues. The only appeal this game has is the pretty (but dated) graphics and decent core gameplay and "decent" is generous.
-
Nov 13, 20124Standard blockbuster, big explosion, big muscles, no brains gaming come to life. Barely got through it, because it was so damn boring. The end boss was the most unimaginative bosses i have ever seen! 4 /10 Because it is payable and not broken!
-
90The hallmark of Gears' weapon design is the balance of powerful tools with critical, exploitable weaknesses, and it's executed with real finesse.
-
100Each stage is memorable...They all combine for an unforgettable adventure through 36 hectic, desperate hours of a group of soldiers' lives...A visual and visceral masterpiece.
-
96If you're a graphics whore, you absolutely, positively need to pick this game up. To say that Gears of War features "next-gen graphics" is a gross understatement. It's got the most impressive graphics ever seen in a video game, and the stellar art direction only makes it more beautiful.