No score yet - based on 2 Critics

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 0 out of 2
  2. Mixed: 0 out of 2
  3. Negative: 2 out of 2
  1. 25
    It's as maddening and absurdly designed as it sounds, and even the simple local co-op play — which allows four reticles onscreen at once — isn't enough to make Heavy Fire appealing.
  2. 20
    A masterclass in bad design. [Apr 2013, p.85]
User Score

Generally unfavorable reviews- based on 7 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 1 out of 4
  2. Negative: 2 out of 4
  1. Oct 30, 2013
    this game sucks to me if your left handed it might be good for you the aiming is on the left stick and it confuses the shooting a lot for right handers I've tried to change it but cant find any way of doing it and you cant move around like you do in better 1st shooter games duck in and out side to side that's not realism Full Review »
  2. Jul 30, 2013
    I haven't played the first heavy fire so i though that i could jump in and love it and i kind of of did. I thought that it would be a first person shooter and that it would be fun. I was kind of disappointed that it was an on rail shooter and that I was going to sell it but i put it in and had a blast with friends and by myself. It's not the best game out there not a chance. But it has potential and a lot of you that read my review are going to hate me for giving this game such a high rating. I think that Mastiff did a good job. The controls are a little wonky but it's still a good game in my OPINION. Full Review »
  3. Feb 21, 2013
    This game is so terrible yet so fun at the same time. This game should only be $10 not $20. Its fun if you have 3 other friends that want to get drunk and have mindless fun shooting evil people. Full Review »