- Publisher: EA Games
- Release Date: Nov 11, 2003
- Also On: PlayStation 2
User Score
6.1
out of 10
Mixed or average reviews- based on 23 Ratings
User score distribution:
-
Positive: 12 out of 23
-
Mixed: 6 out of 23
-
Negative: 5 out of 23
Review this game
-
-
Please sign in or create an account before writing a review.
-
-
Submit
-
Check Spelling
- User score
- Most active
- By date
- Most helpful
- Most Clicked
-
D.V.Apr 25, 20049Pretty cool multiplayer but it could be better.
-
-
MikeM.Nov 11, 20035No real improvement over the last version of Medal of Honor.
-
-
JulieJ.Nov 17, 20038Cool graphics, but the game was to easy.
-
-
CharlesW.Nov 24, 20037This game has amazing graphics...but on the other hand it's to short and there's not that much of an improvment from the last game.
-
-
[Anonymous]Dec 5, 200310This game is keeping in tact with the tactical scenery that medal of honor has always delivered.
-
-
GrayL.Jan 10, 200410Exentent game more life like.
-
-
BloodhawkJan 10, 20047better graphics but so many glitches and game flaws. you can literally pass it in one sitting if you felt so inclined.
-
-
JoshM.Aug 17, 20045The worst graphics for any game i've played not even worth the money. EA did better on the MOH PC games.
-
-
ChrisB.Jan 9, 20051
-
-
RobertU.Oct 23, 20060I thought this was a good game until the singapore sling level where you meet the aussie guy.......he gets in the way of you when he gives you that charge thing so that you cant go up the stairs! So now I have to go and spoil the experience by getting the cheats.
-
-
MichaelR.Nov 10, 20075Its a decent game and a great addition to a collection of WWII video games.Not mind blowing but it has its moments
-
-
TimD.Nov 10, 20039Amazing!!
-
-
ErnestP.Nov 13, 20036It is a cool game because you can play 2 players in game mode....but other then that it is just an Ok games....it is not worth spending the money on it.
-
-
JonathanB.Nov 16, 20038Great game but a little to short.
-
-
DanS.Nov 24, 20036I loved MOH Frontline and was equally psyched for this one. Not only did this game take a long time to get into, but it was over before I blinked. THe shooting is not accurate (I.e. when you hit someone in the head, they don't drop). Save your money for Max Payne 2 if you want to play a FPS.
-
-
LiamB.Nov 26, 20037Way too short and easy.
-
-
AT.Nov 27, 20032I loved the frontline but hate this one. Graphics are terrible, levels extreamly easy, and the weapons are very unrealistic. Come on, why do I have to shoot some one 5 times with a 30-6 rifle?
-
-
ManuelR.Dec 23, 20039I loved it because its got better graphics than the last 1, its got cool levels, though its too short!!!!!!
-
-
70Feels a bit like Michael Bay's Pearl Harbor in that an attempt to make an epic WWII Pacific Theater experience results in a product with brilliant touches mixed with mediocrity.
-
On retreading the levels enemy attacks become predictable puppet shows, with mad-eyed soldiers lining up to get killed exactly where they did many times before. It's the kind of repetition more commonly associated with lightgun games these days. [Christmas 2003, p.109]
-
You can, in practically one extended sitting, blow through the entirety of this dumbed-down, bloodless, sanitized version of America's hard-fought victory. [Dec/Jan 2004, p.88]