- Studio: Warner Bros. Pictures
- Release Date: Aug 27, 1999
- Critic Score
- Most active
- Publication
- Most clicked
-
A beautiful, sad, spiritual story with joy and delicacy, visual chops and emotional depth.
-
75It was the adult in me that wept when the movie ended. Take the kid and have a good time.
-
A film that parents can confidently and with pleasure take their little ones to see - but which is not quite a good movie.
-
As subtle as a cinder block crashing on your head.
-
58Somehow the elements do not add up to by anything especially memorable.
-
54Whenever Voight steps to the forefront, A Dog of Flanders is poochy-keen; alas, the rest of the time it's doggedly dull.
-
50Two of its youthful actors, although adorable, are not skilled enogh to carry their parts.
-
50There are times when watching this film is like a near-death experience.
-
50It can be treacly -- but in a crude way, it makes its point.
-
40This is a movie for younger children -- they won't notice that the children deliver their lines with all the conviction of an airline flight boarding announcement.
-
40Difficult to swallow.
-
40This Dog won't hunt. Although well crafted and handsomely mounted, pic lacks sufficient sizzle.
-
38A mongrel of a movie.
-
30Brodie assembles a grab bag of themes formulaic to films about poverty.
-
30Limp direction, laughable production values, accent-heaving acting and dialogue and more lumps than three-day-old oatmeal.
-
25What a disaster -- a dog.
-
25If you've been longing to see the worst family entertainment of 1966, A Dog of Flanders may be the movie for you.
-
20Full of meaningless tragedies left unjustified by the absurdly optimistic ending .. (an) intolerable story.
-
15There were only two other people in the theater where I saw it, and they left within the first 10 minutes. I should have followed them out.
prev
next
Page:
- 1
There are no user reviews yet.