- Studio: Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation
- Release Date: Jul 31, 2009
User Score
5.2
out of 10
Mixed or average reviews- based on 25 Ratings
User score distribution:
-
Positive: 11 out of 25
-
Mixed: 6 out of 25
-
Negative: 8 out of 25
Review this movie
-
Your Score10 out of 10
-
Please sign in or create an account before writing a review.
-
-
Submit
-
Check Spelling
-
Characters remaining: 5000 out of 5000
- User score
- Most active
- By date
- Most helpful
- Most Clicked
-
JonathanB.Aug 2, 200910Very funny. My son and I laughed from beginning to end. Good clean fun for all.
-
-
Nov 9, 20103The protagonist tanks his grades because he does not want to be perceived as a brainiac. The movie itself does not fake being dumb. It is. The acting is abysmal, the script genuinely idiotic and the, let's say "laughs" can be numbered on the fingers of one hand. Worst of all - they totally wasted Andy Richter - a genuinly funny guy.
-
PatriciaM.Aug 1, 20091This is a terrible film. Do not take your kids. The characters are exceedingly poor role models as are the parents. How on earth do films this bad get greenlighted? Do not waste your money.
-
-
ChadS.Aug 1, 20095
-
-
EvanH.Aug 1, 20090Daniel S. must be a 8 year old kid, within this movies target ages of probably 7 to 11. This movie for me was one that I walked out of.
-
-
BenjaminHAug 10, 20092Honestly, I'd rather just pull out an old copy of Spaced Invaders and show that to the kids than this. And I just might, I miss that movie.
-
-
DougHAug 10, 20098This movie was hilarious. We took our kid twice in one weekend and he laughed his head off both times. Ignore the lame CGI aliens. Who cares about bad CGI anyway? The jokes are hilarious and the cast has a lot of charisma.
-
-
MikeSAug 6, 20091Who the F cares if there's aliens in the attic? THis has E.T rip off written all over it. I hope those five year olds enjoy because not very many others will.
-
-
AlanAug 3, 20097It is what it is. If you went to see it and you don't have young kids, it's your fault! I have two young children, they liked it, I laughed quite a bit. A much better movie than many and not as bad as the butcher job they made out of Harry Potter and the Half Blood Prince- which was a snooze fest.
-
-
kgmAug 4, 20093
-
-
DanielS.Jul 31, 200910AMAZING! Great movie, soo funny! really good acting... specially for Ashley! she was one of the best! the movie is a really family movie! excellent!
-
-
Apr 22, 20124Wasn't a great movie. It was mostly dull and the acting was never great. A bit of a flop to be honest.
-
Apr 16, 20114This film is as lifeless and generic as a corpse. It tries so hard to be funny that it becomes very distasteful. The humour won't even appeal to kids, the plot is generic and the acting is poor. Don't watch.
-
Apr 26, 20110Unfunny, unoriginal, unnecessary. These are the three words that would describe this trash that I wouldn't call a movie. Seeing this is the same as torturing yourself.
-
Apr 26, 20126I expected it to have a dumb story and be unfunny, but it turned out to be somewhat funny and amusing. The acting and story are slightly above average.
-
May 4, 20125I think it was okay but it you might love it... if you were five years old maybe. Really bad acting and really bad story line and overall a okay movie. Alien's in the Attic 5.7/10
prev
next
Page:
- 1
-
70The movie is awfully close to a video game with its own specific rules, but its characters are appealing and funny, "Aliens" doesn't have a mechanical feel that drags down most video-game movies.
-
60Performances are unremarkable but acceptable pretty much across the board, and the vocal talents -- particularly Thomas Haden Church as the belligerent Tazer and Josh Peck as the lovable Sparks -- are well cast.
-
42Like those mild old Disney comedies of the '60s and '70s, it seems perfectly content with being a harmless distraction.