Metascore
54 out of 100

Mixed or average reviews - based on 39 Critics

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 20 out of 39
  2. Negative: 5 out of 39
  1. Smart, satisfying action entertainment that is also a perceptive work of considerable artistry.
  2. 75
    All classic and airtight, and handled by Richet with economy and a sturdy clarity of action; he doesn't go overboard with manic action scenes.
  3. 75
    Smart, entertaining update.
  4. 75
    For those with a high tolerance for violence, Asssault on Precinct 13 is a thriller that actually thrills.
  5. Matches a dingy urban setting with a compelling situation and throws in an ensemble of interesting characters who become even more interesting under stress. This emphasis on character -- in a sense, the movie's underlying humanity -- is what especially links it to the 1970s.
  6. 75
    For what it is, Assault on Precinct 13 delivers. It's not great art, but, for B-movie fans and those looking for a mid-winter jolt of energy, it's good fun.
  7. Reviewed by: Aaron Hillis
    75
    Strikingly shot with some wicked hand-held virtuousity, Assault is rivetingly suspenseful in how it toys with the morals of good guys flip-flopping to the dark side (and vice versa).
  8. One of this enlightened B-movie's many pleasures is French director Jean-François Richet's handling of atmosphere and setting. Shot almost entirely at night in a blinding snowstorm, the crime drama is an intriguing remodelling of a classic film noir.
  9. This remake is considerably different and, for once, the changes have not hurt the film.
  10. The 1976 John Carpenter original has been reworked enough to give the urban thriller a distinct flavor of its own, and stars Ethan Hawke and Laurence Fishburne provide enough gravitas to keep things involving.
  11. Reviewed by: Pete Vonder Haar
    70
    It doesn't surpass the original, but neither does it disgrace its lineage.
  12. It's simply an astringent action flick that uses the wounded sensitivity of Ethan Hawke and Fishburne's witty hauteur to give the shoot-'em-up scenes some juice.
  13. 70
    A surprisingly credible action flick.
  14. Reviewed by: Richard Corliss
    70
    The differences between the two Assaults--the new one's pretty good, the old one near great--are of tone, style and perspective.
  15. Reviewed by: Joe Leydon
    70
    In an era when similar genre pics increasingly resemble videogames, musicvideos or glossy commercials, the blunt, brawny simplicity of helmer Jean-Francois Richet's storytelling style seems positively novel.
  16. It's no classic, but you don't need to be a cultist to get in on the tawdry fun.
  17. Less suspenseful than the original but more ethically nuanced, politically pointed, and violent.
  18. In a preamble that sets up Hawke's character, the jittery hand-held camera and grainy palette establish the look and feel of a '70s movie, thus paying homage to the Carpenter version, which, frankly, had more suspense.
  19. Reviewed by: Claudia Puig
    63
    Serviceable, occasionally compelling but often formulaic.
  20. 60
    A slicked up, perfectly watchable update of a movie that was just about perfect on its own bleakly seedy terms.
  21. Reviewed by: Staff (Not credited)
    60
    A smart script, edgy acting and a gradual accumulation of suspense set-pieces makes for a decent popcorn high.
  22. Volatile yet fairly lunkheaded.
  23. 50
    By playing it safe, the new Precinct leaves the audience sorry and restores thirteen to its place as the unluckiest number.
  24. It's all energetically filmed, but I miss the cool, modest clarity of the first version. Bigger isn't always better, even at the movies.
  25. The big shift between Carpenter's B-movie and filmmaker Jean-François Richet's comic book-style remake is that instead of a troop of bloodthirsty gang members encircling the precinct, the bad guys here all look like good guys.
  26. 50
    Disappointing for a number of reasons. For one thing, it's silly. For another, it's not always silly enough to be diverting.
  27. It's a run-of-the-mill action film that falls short of the 1976 original - and, for that matter, the 1959 western "Rio Bravo," which inspired the first film. The characters run out of energy and personality long before they run out of bullets.
  28. 50
    Excitably puppyish homage.
  29. 50
    Retains every hooky, marketable, and superficially attractive element from its source material while losing everything that made it special.
  30. It's good for a silly laugh, this stuff. And maybe this movie will draw renewed attention to Carpenter's eminently better movie.
  31. Aims to be loud, dumb fun, only it takes itself too seriously to offer anything approaching a good time.
  32. The main thing this "Assault" lacks is a point. Mr. Carpenter's film still resonates with the political paranoia and social unease of the era. Mr. Carpenter's cynical refusal to distinguish clearly between good guys and bad guys feels freshly unsettling, while Mr. Richet's "modernization" looks like something we've seen a hundred times before.
  33. 40
    Still breaks the first and only commandment of remakes: Thou shall at the very least do justice to the original, or thou shall not be made at all.
  34. Whatever spark the newer Precinct 13 has comes from its supporting players.
  35. 33
    Hampered from the start by the numbingly formulaic additions by screenwriter James DeMonaco ("The Negotiator"). Toss in needlessly fussy visuals and a climax that is hilariously out of whack, and you've got an excellent excuse to stay home and watch the original.
  36. 30
    It's never wise to try to one-up a classic.
  37. 30
    Pulp needs a pulse -- without one, it's DOA. No matter how hard some of its actors work to resuscitate it, Assault on Precinct 13 is as lifeless as a corpse on a slab.
User Score

Generally favorable reviews- based on 40 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 16 out of 24
  2. Negative: 5 out of 24
  1. The only scene worth a damn in this ghastly remake is the very opening one, featuring Ethan Hawke close to his best. However, as the film drags along you will slowly be treated to an increasingly hopeless array of actors (including the wonderful anti-talents Ja Rule and John Leguizamo) who blather non-stop about things neither relevant nor interesting. For some reason plans that would be obvious to any airhead trapped in the protagonists' position are called 'smart moves' by Byrne (who is barely given anything else to say or do). Dennehy utilises his talents in saying 'those are Bishop's men' constantly. A pointless romantic sideplot is brought up and dropped along with an equally pointless drug addiction sideplot. Also, it seems like the movie was recorded with no director of photography, as almost the ENTIRE film is completely shot in varying shades of blue and black, with some of the absolute shoddiest camera work this side of a 'found-footage' picture. Often action scenes will be incomprehensible due to unnecessary close-ups and shaky movement, and other times it will be so dark that it is impossible to see. With so much wrong with Assault on Precinct 13, it's a mystery how it was even considered to be worth people's money. There is no reason to watch this. Full Review »
  2. Bill
    2
    terrible film, completely unbelievable storyline, one dimensional characters, unimpressive action sequences its got the lot. Go see 16 blocks instead. Full Review »
  3. GrahamM.
    7
    What is good and redeeming about this film is the atmosphere and mood. Feels almost like it could be a horror film. Some of this film has the atmosphere of and could remind some of the game Resident Evil 2. Full Review »