- Studio: Rogue Pictures
- Release Date: Jan 19, 2005
- Critic Score
- Most active
- Publication
- Most clicked
-
80Smart, satisfying action entertainment that is also a perceptive work of considerable artistry.
-
75All classic and airtight, and handled by Richet with economy and a sturdy clarity of action; he doesn't go overboard with manic action scenes.
-
75The movie rips and roars.
-
75Smart, entertaining update.
-
75For those with a high tolerance for violence, Asssault on Precinct 13 is a thriller that actually thrills.
-
75Matches a dingy urban setting with a compelling situation and throws in an ensemble of interesting characters who become even more interesting under stress. This emphasis on character -- in a sense, the movie's underlying humanity -- is what especially links it to the 1970s.
-
75For what it is, Assault on Precinct 13 delivers. It's not great art, but, for B-movie fans and those looking for a mid-winter jolt of energy, it's good fun.
-
75Strikingly shot with some wicked hand-held virtuousity, Assault is rivetingly suspenseful in how it toys with the morals of good guys flip-flopping to the dark side (and vice versa).
-
75One of this enlightened B-movie's many pleasures is French director Jean-François Richet's handling of atmosphere and setting. Shot almost entirely at night in a blinding snowstorm, the crime drama is an intriguing remodelling of a classic film noir.
-
75This remake is considerably different and, for once, the changes have not hurt the film.
-
70The 1976 John Carpenter original has been reworked enough to give the urban thriller a distinct flavor of its own, and stars Ethan Hawke and Laurence Fishburne provide enough gravitas to keep things involving.
-
70It doesn't surpass the original, but neither does it disgrace its lineage.
-
70It's simply an astringent action flick that uses the wounded sensitivity of Ethan Hawke and Fishburne's witty hauteur to give the shoot-'em-up scenes some juice.
-
70A surprisingly credible action flick.
-
70The differences between the two Assaults--the new one's pretty good, the old one near great--are of tone, style and perspective.
-
70In an era when similar genre pics increasingly resemble videogames, musicvideos or glossy commercials, the blunt, brawny simplicity of helmer Jean-Francois Richet's storytelling style seems positively novel.
-
70It's no classic, but you don't need to be a cultist to get in on the tawdry fun.
-
70Less suspenseful than the original but more ethically nuanced, politically pointed, and violent.
-
63In a preamble that sets up Hawke's character, the jittery hand-held camera and grainy palette establish the look and feel of a '70s movie, thus paying homage to the Carpenter version, which, frankly, had more suspense.
-
63Serviceable, occasionally compelling but often formulaic.
-
60A slicked up, perfectly watchable update of a movie that was just about perfect on its own bleakly seedy terms.
-
60A smart script, edgy acting and a gradual accumulation of suspense set-pieces makes for a decent popcorn high.
-
58Volatile yet fairly lunkheaded.
-
50By playing it safe, the new Precinct leaves the audience sorry and restores thirteen to its place as the unluckiest number.
-
50It's all energetically filmed, but I miss the cool, modest clarity of the first version. Bigger isn't always better, even at the movies.
-
50The big shift between Carpenter's B-movie and filmmaker Jean-François Richet's comic book-style remake is that instead of a troop of bloodthirsty gang members encircling the precinct, the bad guys here all look like good guys.
-
50Disappointing for a number of reasons. For one thing, it's silly. For another, it's not always silly enough to be diverting.
-
50It's a run-of-the-mill action film that falls short of the 1976 original - and, for that matter, the 1959 western "Rio Bravo," which inspired the first film. The characters run out of energy and personality long before they run out of bullets.
-
50Excitably puppyish homage.
-
50Retains every hooky, marketable, and superficially attractive element from its source material while losing everything that made it special.
-
50It's good for a silly laugh, this stuff. And maybe this movie will draw renewed attention to Carpenter's eminently better movie.
-
40Aims to be loud, dumb fun, only it takes itself too seriously to offer anything approaching a good time.
-
40The main thing this "Assault" lacks is a point. Mr. Carpenter's film still resonates with the political paranoia and social unease of the era. Mr. Carpenter's cynical refusal to distinguish clearly between good guys and bad guys feels freshly unsettling, while Mr. Richet's "modernization" looks like something we've seen a hundred times before.
-
40Still breaks the first and only commandment of remakes: Thou shall at the very least do justice to the original, or thou shall not be made at all.
-
38Whatever spark the newer Precinct 13 has comes from its supporting players.
-
33Hampered from the start by the numbingly formulaic additions by screenwriter James DeMonaco ("The Negotiator"). Toss in needlessly fussy visuals and a climax that is hilariously out of whack, and you've got an excellent excuse to stay home and watch the original.
-
30It's never wise to try to one-up a classic.
-
30Pulp needs a pulse -- without one, it's DOA. No matter how hard some of its actors work to resuscitate it, Assault on Precinct 13 is as lifeless as a corpse on a slab.
-
30Lousy remake.
prev
next
Page:
- 1
User score distribution:
-
Positive: 16 out of 24
-
Mixed: 3 out of 24
-
Negative: 5 out of 24
-
2
-
Bill2
-
GrahamM.7