- Studio: Miramax Films
- Release Date: Aug 3, 2007
- Critic Score
- Most active
- Publication
- Most clicked
-
88If one were to fuse the literary sensibility of Jane Austen with the fanciful imaginative license of "Shakespeare in Love," what would emerge would likely be the charming tale Becoming Jane.
-
80An ersatz "Pride and Prejudice" in all but name, Becoming Jane is a finely tooled Brit-lit costumer that, like Anne Hathaway's flawless accent as the young Austen, lacks only that final convincing 5%.
-
75The way all of this plays out is acted warmly by the principals, and Eigil Bryld's photography (of Ireland) makes England look breathtakingly green and inviting. The director, Julian Jarrold ("Kinky Boots" and the TV version of "White Teeth") is comfortable with the material, and it is comfortable with him.
-
75Instead of trying to make Austen's life entertaining by pretending it was just like her work - as in the dull recent French movie "Molière" - Becoming Jane has a more astute appreciation of how Austen, or any fiction writer, works. There's a bit of stealing from life, lots of exaggeration, some wish fulfillment, mix-and-match character assembly.
-
75Anne Hathaway's Jane is headstrong and clever, balanced and true.
-
75Hathaway's proven charms work magic here.
-
75Becoming Jane has a burnished feminine sadness, and the director, Julian Jarrold, gives it a creamy-dark visual flow.
-
70Hathaway's exuberance and dramatic range are fitting for this portrayal of the celebrated literary figure.
-
67But if the notion that Austen was more reactive than creative in her writing is troubling, so is the idea that she needed Lefroy to make her into a great writer. "Experience is vital," he tells her. We should be glad this guy never got his paws on Emily Dickinson.
-
67It's an enjoyable period romance. Yet, ultimately, the unique magic of Austen so beautifully caught in 1996's "Emma" is missing.
-
67It's movie-making as match-making.
-
63Where the film goes wrong is in its attempts to cling too firmly to "Pride and Prejudice."
-
63We can't quite shake the feeling we've seen this all done before, and better.
-
63With so many good Austen adaptations out there (the Keira Knightley Pride & Prejudice, the Colin Firth Pride and Prejudice, Emma Thompson and Ang Lee's splendid Sense and Sensibility), Becoming Jane seems a bit flimsy by comparison.
-
63Jane Austen deserves better than to be subordinated to her own creation, the spirited Lizzy Bennet.
-
63There are enough similarities between the movie and "Pride and Prejudice" that one could be forgiven thinking this screenplay is Austen lite.
-
63Movies about artists play fast and loose with truth, but this is a hoot.
-
Becoming Jane turns into a presentable Harlequin romance, with hurdle after hurdle succeeded by an eleventh-hour turnaround.
-
60As the proud, independent young author, Hathaway is both subdued and alluring--it's her most mature performance. The movie goes down easy, but there's a thin line here: is this an homage or a parasite?
-
60Once you admit that the Jane Austen depicted onscreen bears scant relation to any person named Jane Austen, living or dead, the film fulfills its purpose.
-
The solid cast and honest Austen scholarship make Becoming Jane fitfully entertaining. But it's hard for the film to escape the shadow of Austen's superior talent when it filches so much from her books.
-
50Its weaknesses are clumsy plotting and a less-than-satisfying ending.
-
50Feels like one of those misguided high-school-teacher exercises in making literary history sound contemporary.
-
50Becoming Jane isn't just a soap opera - it's a soft-soap opera.
-
50A bearable period chick flick with a self-congratulatory "realistic" conceit.
-
50The screenplay's pseudo-Austen tone is so consistent that its lapses into modern romance-novel fantasy threaten to derail the film.
-
50I'll stipulate that in Austen's time spinsterhood was a fate to be strenuously avoided. And being a woman writer was by no means an easy path either. Yet, she embraced it, and the immortal results more than justify a hard choice this film never really explores.
-
Austen comes off here more as stenographer than writer. Worse, the movie has Tom Lefroy as her condescending guide.
-
50So I expect the Janeites who love the author will feel themselves ill-served by the film, which appears to have even less basis in fact than "Shakespeare in Love." As for the rest of us, the question is simpler: Is it worth the eight bucks?
-
50This never rises above a date movie, but it's functionally literate.
-
50The film tries to squeeze Austen into one of her novels, and the peg doesn't fit.
-
In fictionalizing the story of Austen, the filmmakers didn't go far enough. Becoming Jane attempts to please the purists and the dreamers, but only results in disappointing both.
-
40Becoming Jane would have been more honest if it had been called "No Sex in the Country."
-
40It's neither very original nor very convincing. "Shakespeare in Love" did something similar by casting its writer protagonist as the hero of a story he himself might have written, but Becoming Jane lacks that movie's wit and playfulness.
prev
next
Page:
- 1
User score distribution:
-
Positive: 11 out of 14
-
Mixed: 2 out of 14
-
Negative: 1 out of 14
-
MarF.10love it. It's so sad to think that Jane Austen wrote in her novels the happy ending she could't have in real life.
-
SarahB.4
-
ChadS.6