- Studio: Warner Bros. Domestic Television Distribution
- Release Date: Sep 27, 2000
User Score
7.5
out of 10
Generally favorable reviews- based on 44 Ratings
User score distribution:
-
Positive: 37 out of 44
-
Mixed: 1 out of 44
-
Negative: 6 out of 44
Review this movie
-
-
Please sign in or create an account before writing a review.
-
-
Submit
-
Check Spelling
- User score
- Most active
- By date
- Most helpful
- Most Clicked
-
CCH.Jul 2, 20012Very few funny moments. Big disappointment. With all the critical acclaim, I expected a halfway decent movie. Instead, I got 90 minutes of BO-RING. The characters are not funny - just pathetic losers. I actually began to feel sorry for the dogs, whose only purpose is to win shows and make money for their owners.
-
-
DerekW.Jul 6, 20020Unlike spinal tap, I couldn't connect with any of these characters. While they're all odd, I never really cared about them; and just found their ongoing disfunctional interactions painful to watch. Got this movie from the library, and based on the creases in the tape, it doesn't look like anyone made it to the end. (Myself included.)
-
-
GilC.Jun 23, 20010
-
-
EileenAug 29, 20020It sucked It's the worst movie I have ever seen in my life. You people who give it tens are insaine because it SUCKED ASS.
-
-
ChapinS.Jul 6, 20012Why does everyone think this movie is so funny? The jokes are cliche and the script is the same as "Waiting for Gufman" except the scene is different. I had a couple of chuckles but no belly laughs. Another film pointing to the sad state of American cinema today.
-
-
TedB.Jul 16, 20014Boring and unfunny. Waste of a very good cast.
-
-
70Just isn't as fresh, focused or uniformly funny as "Waiting for Guffman."
-
78It's got enough hilarious moments that, all in all, the film's bite is as toothsome as its bark.
-
75When it's funny, Best is hilarious.