SummaryIn a future of high-tech possibility soured by urban and social decay, detective Rick Deckard hunts for fugitive, murderous replicants—and is drawn to a mystery woman whose secrets may undermine his soul. [Warner Bros.]
SummaryIn a future of high-tech possibility soured by urban and social decay, detective Rick Deckard hunts for fugitive, murderous replicants—and is drawn to a mystery woman whose secrets may undermine his soul. [Warner Bros.]
Blade Runner is a cold, bold, bizarre and mesmerizing futuristic detective thriller that unites the British-born director of Alien with new box-office dynamo Harrison Ford for results that are as impressive as any film that's exploded through a projector so far this year.
This movie is great in any version...I don't miss what has been cut from the new version. The overall effect is so beautifully wrought, a few details aren't going to bring things crashing down.
Blade Runner is a neon-soaked masterpiece of the sci-fi movie world, deserving every bit of its 10 out of 10 rating. This film, directed by Ridley Scott, is not just a classic of the genre; it's a work of art that has left an indelible mark on cinematic **** visual and artistic brilliance of Blade Runner is immediately apparent. Its iconic cyberpunk aesthetic, characterized by rain-soaked streets, towering cityscapes, and dazzling neon signs, remains unrivaled. The attention to detail in crafting a dystopian future that is both bleak and mesmerizing is nothing short of **** it's not just the visuals that make Blade Runner a masterpiece. The film explores profound themes that elevate it to the status of art. It delves into the nature of humanity, morality, and identity, all against the backdrop of a world where artificial intelligence blurs the line between human and **** the heart of Blade Runner is the enigmatic character of Rick Deckard, portrayed by Harrison Ford. Deckard's journey as a "blade runner," tasked with hunting down rogue replicants, is a compelling exploration of what it means to be human. The film challenges us to question the essence of life and what separates us from the very creations we seek to **** haunting and evocative soundtrack by Vangelis adds another layer to the film's artistic depth. It weaves a sonic tapestry that resonates with the soul, enhancing the emotional impact of each scene.Blade Runner is a film that has influenced countless works of science fiction and continues to inspire filmmakers and artists to this day. Its legacy is a testament to its artistry and its ability to transcend the boundaries of its **** conclusion, Blade Runner is a neon-soaked masterpiece that transcends the sci-fi genre to be considered a work of art. Its striking visuals, deep philosophical themes, and enduring impact on cinema make it a perfect 10 out of 10. It's a film that not only stands the test of time but also defines the very essence of cinematic artistry.
The grafting of 40s hard-boiled detective story with SF thriller creates some dysfunctional overlaps, and the movie loses some force whenever violence takes over, yet this remains a truly extraordinary, densely imagined version of both the future and the present, with a look and taste all its own.
Blade Runner is a rare science fiction movie so full of material that pages can be written about it without scratching the surface. A review like this can provide little more than an overview. A detailed exploration of the movie, its style, and its mysteries requires dedication that only someone immersed in Blade Runner lore can provide. Currently, the film is available in the United States only in the director's cut. Warner Brothers, however, has promised an exhaustive box set next year with multiple versions. It will be interesting to see whether those editions offer new insights or expand upon the film's already rich tapestry.
What remains is a great Vangelis score, astonishing production design, Hauer's career role -- and a movie that deserves its cult reputation despite an unloving heart. [11 Sept 1992]
There may be little point in deploring Blade Runner's lack of entertainment value. The production values, a reported $30 million worth, are nearly the whole show. They are impressive, to be sure. [26 June 1982, p.D6]
As before, the movie is more impressive for its finely detailed vision of Los Angeles as a futuristic slum than for its story, acting, or message. It's all downhill after the first few eye-dazzling minutes. [2 Oct 1992]
Are replicants just like people? Why do they act so weird? We essentially get a barebones noir/action film with this somewhat interesting background that is never properly fleshed out. I wish that the film paid as much attention to its characters as it does its visuals. What we are left with is a run of the mill chase flick with one romance that has aged very poorly.
Excruciatingly boring. Less dialogue than Castaway. Slower than 2001. Less plot than Coffee and Cigarettes. Uninspiring acting. The only reason this film has a non-zero score is the effects, but that's not a good enough reason to watch this one.
Production Company
The Ladd Company,
Shaw Brothers,
Warner Bros.,
Blade Runner Partnership,
Michael Deeley Production,
Ridley Scott Productions,
Scott Free Productions