Metascore
56 out of 100

Mixed or average reviews - based on 26 Critics

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 11 out of 26
  2. Negative: 2 out of 26
  1. 88
    Bottle Shock is more than the story. It is also about people who love their work, care about it with passion and talk about it with knowledge.
  2. Reviewed by: Stephen Farber
    80
    This intelligent, affectionate, beautifully acted movie gives crowd-pleasers a good name.
  3. 75
    It's a winner. And not just for oenophiles. Director Randall Miller, who co-wrote the script with his wife Jody Savin, keeps the plot brimming with spirit and wit.
  4. 75
    Beautifully shot by Michael J. Ozier, the dominating taste in Bottle Shock is Rickman's beautiful performance as a snob - a snob who is secretly open to being delightfully surprised.
  5. 75
    A charming comedy-drama that's surprising true to the events that inspired it.
  6. Reviewed by: Claudia Puig
    75
    It's the kind of feel-good movie whose resolution is evident from the start, being based as it is on a true story. But that doesn't make the journey any less interesting.
  7. Reviewed by: Ty Burr
    75
    Low budget, self-distributed, awkwardly charming, it's the kind of midrange Hollywood entertainment that's supposed to be extinct in this modern age. It makes you want to support your local vintner and your local moviemaker.
  8. 70
    Just around the halfway point, something unexpected happens -- the movie actually gets good. You can chalk that up to the delightful Alan Rickman.
  9. Reviewed by: Robert Koehler
    70
    Wine lovers won't just sip but guzzle a lot of this down, and the same effect that sun-dappled days and sex in California had on "Sideways" operates here.
  10. Whatta movie: booze, unhappy French people, Alan Rickman and really cool pickup trucks.
  11. 67
    Bottle Shock never quite connects. And considering the more recent transformation of Napa, the movie's triumphant ending rings a bit false.
  12. 60
    I found myself in a tug-of-war between enjoying Bottle Shock as entertaining fluff, and thinking that there might be a more serious, gritty, complicated story lurking behind the grab-ass soap opera.
  13. Reviewed by: Dana Stevens
    60
    So why did I feel such affection for this scruffy, hokey little movie? Maybe it's the same logic that applies to wine-drinking itself: Sure, a great claret would be ideal, but an OK rosé is better than washing down your dinner with water.
  14. 58
    Trouble is, it's too rambling and digressive to feel focused, yet too calculating to feel as observational and natural as a good Altman flick.
  15. Wine may be sunlight held together by water, as Galileo said, but Bottle Shock is held together only by Alan Rickman.
  16. 50
    Bottle Shock often feels out of place on the big screen, but it would probably play a lot better as a weekly half-hour TV show.
  17. A great story - and a true one, more or less - Bottle Shock nonetheless fails to deliver much in the way of entertainment.
  18. Reviewed by: Jason McBride
    50
    For all of its intermittent, crowd-pleasing charm, oenophiles (and cinephiles, for that matter) might be better off putting their money toward a good bottle of Robert Mondavi.
  19. 50
    Bottle Shock wastes that intriguing bit of history and some seductive Napa Valley settings on a bland script that's part period piece, part underdog fable.
  20. Reviewed by: Michael Ordona
    50
    The soul of the grape, that thing that elevates a wine to greatness, proves here as elusive on screen as in the bottle.
  21. 50
    Bottle Shock is unable to figure out what kind of movie it wants to be, and flops around between madcap comedy and rousing drama. To borrow a wine-snob term of art, it lacks structure.
  22. Unfortunately, Miller never finds the right balance, so while there are some sweet notes, the pileup of clichés ultimately leaves a slightly acrid aftertaste.
  23. Reviewed by: Robert Wilonsky
    40
    The movie should have been more like Rickman: sparkling and light, with just a hint of acid. Instead, it's a huge gulp of vinegar.
  24. Stuff the cork back in: This wine movie was sold before its time.
  25. Reviewed by: Reyhan Harmanci
    25
    This schlocky period piece doesn't do the pioneering Northern Californians justice. The script is overwritten to the point of parody.
User Score

Mixed or average reviews- based on 22 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 9 out of 18
  2. Negative: 5 out of 18
  1. MarkC.
    10
    For a lover of the idea of a man or woman's dare to dream, I loved it. I am young hopeful winemaker from Oregon and that movie gets me every time. Its a beautiful story. It is Hollywood and it can be critiqued if you want to look that far in to it. But for me it is more of the overall message and the secret appeals of living life true to your heart. Loved it. Full Review »
  2. PaulL.
    2
    Glad I didn't pay for theater tickets on this one. Characters were one-dimensional caricatures for the most part; no depth or complexity. Story had great potential, but fell short. Funny how shiny all the cars were after driving down the dirty country roads in France. And the shack where the love scene happened in Napa was not a believable scene - if the architecture were real she'd be a constant distraction to field workers with the lack of privacy, her person and property would be unsecure, and she'd have serious problems in inclement weather. Full Review »
  3. CarlitoD.
    6
    Starts slow and ends corny but everything in between is nice. Don't expect greatness and you'll not be disappointed.