- Studio: Miramax Films
- Release Date: Jul 25, 2008
User Score
5.4
out of 10
Mixed or average reviews- based on 33 Ratings
User score distribution:
-
Positive: 19 out of 33
-
Mixed: 5 out of 33
-
Negative: 9 out of 33
Review this movie
-
-
Please sign in or create an account before writing a review.
-
-
Submit
-
Check Spelling
- User score
- Most active
- By date
- Most helpful
- Most Clicked
-
SebZ.Oct 5, 20087Emma Thompson is absolutely amazing and the story of forbidden love and loss of innocence is beautifully told.
-
-
BobbieAug 10, 20081Beautiful scenery. As for the rest of the movie it was a waste of time. No character development. Yes, we understand the mother was overbearing and the children hated her. So why not leave! Just awful.
-
-
DavidW.Aug 1, 20085Brideshead was an ITV tv series, not BBC, as assumed by Peter Rainer of the Christian Science Monitor. Hay, imagine it, little old UK has more than one TV station, who would have thought??
-
-
BradKAug 10, 200810The performances are spot on and the design and cinematography are reason alone to see the film.
-
-
DuragoAug 8, 20080Awful and boring. A waste of time.
-
-
TanyaMAug 8, 20085
-
-
WaughmongerSep 30, 20086If only Evelyn Waugh had been born 50 years later, so he could have been around to take advice from "Jackson" on plot development and "Bobbie" on characterization. That aside, the film is a disappointing adaption of a book that is structurally better suited to a television serial, as demonstrated by comparison with the classic ITV version.
-
-
JayH.Jan 8, 20096Talky but exquisitely produced. Excellent costumes, art direction and cinematography. The acting is good as well, the director has a good style.
-
-
ChadS.Aug 11, 20085
-
-
ScottS.Aug 11, 20081Choppy and disjointed, and painfully long.
-
-
CarolA.Aug 7, 20082This movie was an abomination. It was soooooo long and boring. The story made absolutely no sense. It went on and on and could have ended a million times. Just a waste of money and time.
-
-
pascaladolphejeanJan 16, 20095Although the production values are generally good, there is a clobber-you-over-the-head quality to the screen adaptation and some of the performances that make the film far inferior to the mini-series. Marginalizing the theme of old-world Catholicism in the lives of the characters was also a major mistake. At best, this version is a watchable costume drama, and not much more. Too bad.
-
-
MatthewM.Jan 31, 20099Fantastic period piece. A beautifully tragic story where religion, dying victorian values, social ambition, and a vastly changing world in the early 20th century are at odds.
-
-
RobertI.Mar 1, 20096Workmanlike, lush, but lacking tooth. Is our generation simply more insipid than the original, or addicted to Technicolor? Give us 8 more hours, in black and white.
-
-
MauriceAug 14, 20089May be not as great as the TV series, but it is still a very good movie. Great performances, particularly Emma Thompson. Beautiful cinematography and art direction.
-
-
FantasyAug 14, 20080Someone gave this a perfect score of 10 like in Gone With The Wind? OK my score is zero because this is a snoozefest of epic proportions. There is nothing to like about this movie as the story is disjointed and way too long. Boring.
-
-
JacksonAug 19, 20080Terrible long drawn out movie. The story went nowhere. Can't believe anyone liked this trash.
-
-
60Although it has its involving moments, the watered-down Waugh fails to make any kind of lasting connection.
-
80Offers lush and compelling drama drawn from Evelyn Waugh's beloved novel. Purists may blanch at the screenplay's changes to the source material's narrative fine points, but its spirit survives intact.
-
70The remarkable thing about Jarrold's movie is how much of the book it manages to capture.