- Studio: Universal Pictures
- Release Date: Jan 11, 2002
User Score
6.7
out of 10
Generally favorable reviews- based on 32 Ratings
User score distribution:
-
Positive: 24 out of 32
-
Mixed: 3 out of 32
-
Negative: 5 out of 32
Review this movie
-
Your Score10 out of 10
-
Please sign in or create an account before writing a review.
-
-
Submit
-
Check Spelling
-
Characters remaining: 5000 out of 5000
- User score
- Most active
- By date
- Most helpful
- Most Clicked
-
AndrewC.Feb 1, 20025I understand the fact that this movie had fantastic fight scenes, however, it still does not make up for the rest of the 2.5 hours. I felt that this film lacked in many aspects. Issues that I'd rather not get into.
-
-
AadhaarV.Feb 8, 20039A truly stunning movie. One of the best films I have seen in a long time.
-
-
MattW.Nov 5, 20025This film would have been appreciably more entertaining had the beast had some semblance of reality.
-
-
J.A.Jan 19, 20028A stellar genre exercise and well worth seeing. Easily the best French-period-costume-drama-martial-arts-horror film ever made. A little overlong, but so was "Fellowship of the Ring." It was still great, and so is this.
-
-
JohnT.Oct 20, 20029It far exceeds anything put out in the USA in the past year. Great all around movie.
-
-
MikeburwellDec 27, 20029One of the best movies we saw in 2002 and we see about 1-2 a week. everything is over the top, and that is why we see movies it's escapism at its finest. some people say it was unrealistic, gee folks it's entertainment, if i want reality i'll go to my boring old job!
-
-
RossW.Jan 27, 20029This movie rocks! The fights are soo cool and stylish. Though some think it was a bit long and so was the story, however I thought they were just right.
-
-
RyanM.Feb 2, 20021An everlasting bore of a violent mythic mess.
-
-
PeterSMar 23, 20028Along with "Amelie" helps prove that French cinema is really getting serious. Simply brillant cinematography and fight scenes. Great if you want a movie to get wrapped up in without taking it too seriously.
-
-
MarioB.Nov 24, 20033As a huge fan of multi-genre films, particualrly action/horror, I can say without hesitation that this was pure, utter crap. Some much potential was ruined by sloppiness on every level of the production. There's not one interesting moment.
-
-
MylesK.Mar 2, 20030Man o man, nobody could finish this movie, it was waaaay too long and the flow of the movie was ruined every 5 mintues. The script was awful, it jumps from someones friends being dead, to inviting someone to dinner two words later. It was a waste of my money, guess that's why it didn't last long in the theaters.....
-
-
Carlh.Apr 18, 20038The scenery was great, I liked the jumpiness from one thing to the next. The little dog at the end needed to be eaten by the monster. Well done brothel scenes and peasant blouses were a plus.
-
-
WilliamG.Jun 1, 20058
-
-
MichaelF.Jan 16, 20027The action sequences are incredible, but the story loses itself by trying to add a couple of twists that really don't do anything good for the film. The fight sequences are great but the film is way too overlong.
-
-
ArthurR.Jr.Dec 10, 20028This was a fantastically entertaining movie. Wish there could have been future movies with Fronsac and Mani. Throws everything and a brothel at you. Actually, the brothel scenes could have been cut out as it undermined the courtship of Fronsac and Marianne. Fronsac should have figured out where the animal was kept much sooner than he did. Mani should have survived.
-
-
RichardAug 27, 20027It's the dawn of the French Revolution and everybody knows kung fu. There's a courtesan who's working for an unlikely boss. The movie has about seven false endings and I'm still not sure what the damn thing was about. Definitely not boring, though.
-
-
MichaelR.Nov 28, 200310I enjoyed it a lot. I really don't see where some of the complaints came from.
-
-
JohnR.Jul 22, 20037It was a bit long, but I really enjoyed it. It's just a fun movie; there isn't a whole lot of substance there, but it's undeniably cool.
-
-
CalmelsP.Dec 20, 20052
-
-
Jan 19, 20129good film but way too long, they could have definitely edited it down and it would have been just as good. the fight scenes were excellent, the acting alright. it had an interesting story, and you don't need to know that much about France at that time. All in all it's a good movie, watch it on a rainy weekend. 94%
-
Nov 23, 20119Sorry, the movie was excellent. I liked the cast with Vincent Cassel convincing and the movie was fresh, uptodate covering an interesting historical topic. OK sometime very much Hollywood- like exagerating, but I love historical movies as there r not enough anyway. Good movie, worth watching
-
Mar 30, 20120This is movie is a disgrace. No idea what is going on, which made it incredibly boring. This movie wasted my time like no other. Stay away and i mean stay away.
prev
next
Page:
- 1
-
75I would be lying if I did not admit that this is all, in its absurd and overheated way, entertaining.
-
50It's mindless, which is rarely true of French cinema, dull, which is rarely true of Hong Kong films, and portentous, which shouldn't be true of any film about a man-eating dog.
-
30An exuberantly garish French movie.