- Release Date: May 25, 2007
User Score
4.8
out of 10
Mixed or average reviews- based on 86 Ratings
User score distribution:
-
Positive: 39 out of 86
-
Mixed: 8 out of 86
-
Negative: 39 out of 86
Review this movie
-
-
Please sign in or create an account before writing a review.
-
-
Submit
-
Check Spelling
- User score
- Most active
- By date
- Most helpful
- Most Clicked
-
WoodersonMay 28, 20072Rapidly descends into arch absurdity. A little restraint by the lead actor or opening up to a more cinematic feel might have helped.
-
-
halbOct 5, 20076
-
-
KayB.Oct 9, 20071hello? hello? are you kidding me? where are the bugs? two crazy lonely people that can't face reality alone. don't we have enough of that in our day to day lives.
-
-
FrankJun 1, 20072Very slow and pointless. Terrible beginning, middle, and end. Not even worth seeing for free.
-
-
TrentS.Jun 1, 20078
-
-
KennethS.Jun 4, 20079For anyone who has ever been around a person on the edge of sanity this was a very chilling portrayal of the descent into madness. A great real-life horror film with fantastic acting and direction.
-
-
M.V.Jun 4, 20070
-
-
BrookeWOct 1, 20072Previews for Bug made the movie seem like a thriller about a virus that causes insanity or delusions
-
-
BobCOct 9, 20077
-
-
TylerG.May 25, 200710Great horror film one of the best of the year by far one of the best ever, go see this movie, it has great acting and it's overall a great experience.
-
-
JoM.May 28, 20071
-
-
JSmithMay 28, 20070First movie in a long while that I was tempted to walk out on. This flick is for only those people who like to watch wack-o people doing their wack-o thing.
-
-
BillC.May 31, 20075
-
-
BrandiJ.Jun 3, 20070
-
-
RicardoC.Jun 3, 20070Don't waste your time with this piece of nothing.
-
-
JRJun 4, 20070The worst movie ever! I will be asking for a refund on this movie. Someone must've owed a favor to let this movie hit theatres!!
-
-
KayannS.Jun 7, 20070This movie made absolutely no sense whatsoever please do not waste your precious time (which its so not worth) and money to see this senseless film. By the way there were no BUGS in the movie...and a total of seven characters. Wow this is the first and worst ever movie for me.
-
-
PooponSep 26, 20079
-
-
KennedyF.Feb 22, 20089Tense and totally engrossing. Amazing performances.
-
-
AliciaS.Oct 24, 20078An awesomely creepy look at how delusion and paranoia can spread. Unbelievable acting. The first half is a little slow, but it becomes more and more creepy as it builds up to a very powerful end. As a Psych major, I ate it up. I have never seen anything else to even begin to compare it to! Unique and clever. A must-see for anyone interested in the human psyche.
-
-
Jo-anB.May 27, 20079What a great acting job. I really unique movie Think Ashley Judd out did herself; what a contrast to her past movies. Harry Conick is not quite as believable, but I really liked Michael Shannon...it was nice to see a newcomer in the mix.
-
-
GraemedarkMay 28, 20078Not the average slasher/horror film many may be expecting... there were several walkouts at the screening I attended (all chatty teenagers with too-active cell phones, I'll say). This is basically an intense, psychological arthouse film, more potent and sophisticated than the teen fare we've been inundated with lately. Definitely for the adventurous cineaste.
-
-
FrankvMay 28, 20072Distasteful is all that I can say. WHY would Ashley Judd make play a role as a drugged-up, alcoholic, lesbo? Is this a good career move? It was certainly misrepresented in the trailers as a sci-fi horror movie, which it is not. Virtually everyone coming out of the movie wanted a refund. I even saw someone coming out warn away someone who was buying a ticket for the next showing.
-
-
GeorgeH.May 29, 20070
-
-
AW.May 29, 20070This movie has no redeeming value... it is clear that it was made for the stage and was probably a decent enough piece for the theater, but it dies a painful and annoying death on the screen. The theater was full when it started and half the people walked out along the way... I kept waiting for it to turn the corner, however, perhaps mercifully the credits started to roll.
-
-
PhilO.May 30, 20075
-
-
BobJ.May 31, 20070the most appealing part of the movie were the preveiws before it, not even flashing some breasts makes the movie watchable
-
-
RichardB.May 30, 200710Its not the gory gross out torture movie that the current horror fans seem to want, but its a movie with great acting, very original, and really "gets under your skin."
-
-
ChadS.Jun 1, 20077
-
-
PaulK.Jun 15, 20077This definitely takes a long time to get where it's going, but the end of it is payoff worth the wait. A good video pick for the fall/winter.
-
-
MarthaP.Jun 2, 20075There is a lot to like in this gritty, claustrophobic, sometimes funny, horror movie. But the writing lacks coherence and logic. The political rants are not grounded. Implausible tragedy and madness, granted, are hard to write well.
-
-
JonathanH.Jun 3, 20075
-
-
JimSJun 4, 20071
-
-
BeakBeakJun 4, 200710Bug was a good movie. Not what I expect, but good. I think most people who didn't like this movie expected a run-of-the-mill horror flick. Well it wasn't one, sorry you retards don't understand anything beyond Van Helsing.
-
-
TomYJun 5, 20070It tries to present two sides of a story that leaves the viewer in a state of stupendous wonder. Instead, they leave thinking "why should i care?!?!"
-
-
RobertRSep 22, 20077Bug is stupendous. It
-
-
SamK.Sep 28, 20075
-
-
MartinZ.Jan 18, 20083
-
-
JenCNov 20, 20071that was the biggest waste of my time. What is the deal with the bugs, are they really there or are the people just delusional? And was it really necessary to light yourself on fire? The only part that sparked any emotion is me is the pity i felt for Ashley Judd's character, that she needed to be loved so bad that she was willing to put up with psycho path bug boy. Lame.
-
-
SuziP.Oct 12, 200710I love this movie it totally tore my heart out at the end!
-
-
BillB.Oct 17, 20078Even though I was bored through most of the movie, and the ending wasn't very brutal, or surprising, I still liked this movie. It is not based on a formula, and it is memorable. What more can one ask for?
-
-
MWDec 12, 20078
-
-
DWillyMay 26, 20073
-
-
syzygyMay 27, 20074By its denouement, it was shrill. Friedkin turned tone deaf two-thirds of the way in, and I'm growing here for compliments. The leads are admirable with decent material, but the tiring focus on Judd and Shannon's descent into self-destruction is anemic.
-
-
AutumnM.May 28, 20070This is the worst waste of time and money I have ever encountered...I was sorely tempted to leave half-way through the show.
-
-
J.J.M.May 29, 20078
-
-
MarkMay 31, 200710
-
-
BeckyG.May 31, 20070Absolutely the worst movie ever made, ok, maybe not ever made. I too wanted my money back as did just about everyone in the theater. Why would such a talented actress to this to herself. I love scifi, but this was definitely not that. A huge disappointment. Run far, far away. Don't even recommend spending money to rent it, as it will be out on video soon enough.
-
-
MelissaD.May 31, 20071
-
-
D.MartinezJun 14, 20070Unbelievably bad movie! Total waste of money, horrible story, you name it. Probably in the top 10 worst movies of all time.
-
-
OhWhenJul 15, 20070
-
-
MikeF.Sep 26, 20070worst movie of the year. It's watching two mildly retarded people talking in a hotel room becoming more and more paranoid. The plot makes no sense. This is not a thriller nor a horror. It is not intense nor provocative. It is ridiculous, slow, and confusing.
-
-
luluf.Dec 13, 200710Blew me away! Starts off slow. I actually looked at the CD blurb to see if I had picked up a drama rather than a horror flick. But just hang on. Let the movie steep you like a bag of tea in hot water. The scorch is coming. Hang on! Loved it. Would like to see more filmmaking of this caliber.
-
-
Nov 25, 201110This film is a huge **** It starts off interesting and ends perfectly and it shows just how far 2 people can go into madness. I think the leads were great and played their roles perfectly. I really liked this film.
-
Nov 6, 201010**** great. Utterly mis-marketed. Michael Shannon gives a spellbinding performance that will stand the test of time with some of the great characters of the last 20 years.
-
Jan 16, 20126The plot is interesting but its rather confusing as well and will probably require a second watch or even a third to really understand it. The acting is amazing though and the cast is severely underrated imo. Michael Shannon plays his part perfectly. Its well worth the watch imo.
-
Apr 6, 20125
-
With his (Friedkin) vigorous camera compositions and a talented cast, he manages to straddle a wickedly fine line between taught portrayal of paranoia and parody of paranoia.
-
40A ranting, claustrophobic drama that trades in shopworn paranoid notions, William Friedkin's overwrought screen version of Tracy Letts' play assaults the viewer with aggressive thesping and over-the-top notions of shocking incident, all to intensely alienating effect.
-
80Has the feverish compression of live theater and the moody expansiveness of film. The mix is insanely powerful.