Metascore
37 out of 100

Generally unfavorable - based on 30 Critics

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 3 out of 30
  2. Negative: 12 out of 30
  1. A delicate film - not flimsy, but fragile - that holds together on the strength of Efron's physical presence and performance.
  2. 70
    The vehicle may get a little jacked up along the way, but its passenger arrives in style: The kid's a star.
  3. The byplay between Efron and newcomer Tahan as his brother has a warmth and intimacy that establish the film's tone. The performances carry the film.
  4. Reviewed by: Aaron Hillis
    60
    This handsomely shot melodrama has a twist too peculiar to dismiss as some two-bit Nicholas Sparks weepie.
  5. Reviewed by: Dennis Harvey
    60
    Religious overtones, however, could make this the rare mainstream feature that connects with the faith-based entertainment market.
  6. 50
    Charlie St. Cloud is primarily a vehicle to prove the actor can do more than dance and sing. It's more of a demo reel for Efron than a movie. His predominant fan base, though, won't mind a bit.
  7. Reviewed by: Claudia Puig
    50
    The movie tries to capture the crushing weight of loss, but between the insipid pop tunes and the repetitive shots cutting away to a lighthouse on a scenic outcropping, it feels more like a film version of a condolence card.
  8. 50
    The movie's central gimmick isn't enough, and when more supernatural twists that don't play by the movie's own fantasy rules kick in, it lost me.
  9. 50
    One thing that defies debate: Zac Efron is going places as an actor of value. But he deserves better movies than Charlie St. Cloud.
  10. 50
    Guilt, grief and the struggle to move on are big themes, but unfortunately, director Burr Steers and his script writers aren't interested in exploring them.
  11. Reviewed by: Vadim Rizov
    50
    The surprises really do surprise but often because they're remarkably stupid and poorly explained.
  12. 50
    The film is memorable mainly for attractive people sailing and smooching against an attractive backdrop. There's no urgency behind all the preening.
  13. The surreal thing is, Zac Efron can't do despair.
  14. Reviewed by: Mark Jenkins
    40
    This ode to "moving on" from grief packs so little genuine emotion that it will touch only the most susceptible of viewers.
  15. Though it was directed by Burr Steers, Charlie St. Cloud feels more like a misguided collaboration among Nicholas Sparks, M. Night Shyamalan and Billy Graham.
  16. Cue those weepy violins. Indeed, you get everything you'd expect from this mostly saccharine melodrama.
  17. Though the soundtrack comes on kind of heavy, the cinematography (by Enrique Chediak) has a beautiful clarity. Yorick's skull or not, Charlie St. Cloud is no Shakespearean drama, but the film should prove to be another solid stepping stone for Efron on his way to a long adult career.
  18. For now, Efron remains an unrealized dream and Charlie St. Cloud an unrealized movie, though judging from the "ooohhs" and "awwwws" from the audience, for his core tween-girl fans, that's more than enough.
  19. Director Burr Steers milks them dry, like an overeager farmer at milking time, which is a paradox since this is the wettest picture of 2010, what with the sea spray and Efron's tear ducts and the general metaphysical mist.
  20. Charlie St. Cloud, like its star Zac Efron, is a gorgeous, unblemished thing. Both would be much improved with a tiny flaw or two.
  21. 38
    It has no pulse, no apparent breath.
  22. 38
    Clumsily incorporates elements of "Ghost," "The Sixth Sense," and "Field of Dreams."
  23. Reviewed by: John DeVore
    38
    Ultimately, the reason Charlie St. Cloud loses its momentum is because a love triangle between a grieving man, a beautiful woman from his past, and a spectral shade is just too strange.
  24. It's more like a shelved episode of "Touched by An Angel." The sappy script is a disservice to the naturally effervescent Efron, whose character is so mopey he makes Robert Pattinson seem like a song-and-dance man.
  25. The film doesn't just fail, it actually gets sillier by the minute.
  26. 30
    The scenes in which Charlie plays catch with the ghost of his Red Sox-happy brother are only the most mawkish in a movie whose every element is calculated to set a 12-year-old girl's heart thumping.
  27. 25
    Some bad movies should carry a leper's bell to warn off ticket buyers. Such a contagion is Charlie St. Cloud, a load of mawkish swill starring Zac Efron (bereft of the talent he showed in "Me and Orson Welles").
  28. 25
    A maudlin and unintentionally hilarious romantic weepie.
  29. What "serious" means for young actors, as we know from Miley Cyrus's "The Last Song," is maudlin, and Charlie St. Cloud is no exception.
  30. 20
    You are not, in a movie like this, supposed to think too much; you are supposed to be transported beyond skepticism on a wave of pure, tacky feeling. Instead, in this case, you drown in sentimental, ghoulish nonsense.
User Score

Mixed or average reviews- based on 24 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 1 out of 7
  2. Negative: 4 out of 7
  1. I could have given 2 more points if "Charlie St. Cloud" knew what morale it was going to present. Guess it didn't do its homework...
  2. It has good acting, but the story is very shallow. The unpredictability is common here. The lesson that you could've learned from this is missing.
  3. Zac Efron gives all his dramatic acting talent (which isn't much) and tries really hard to save this clear rip-off of the lovely bones. Sadly it fails worse than I described om the first sentence. I give this movie 15%. Full Review »