- Studio: Lionsgate
- Release Date: Apr 17, 2009
User Score
6.9
out of 10
Generally favorable reviews- based on 142 Ratings
User score distribution:
-
Positive: 101 out of 142
-
Mixed: 11 out of 142
-
Negative: 30 out of 142
Review this movie
-
-
Please sign in or create an account before writing a review.
-
-
Submit
-
Check Spelling
- User score
- Most active
- By date
- Most helpful
- Most Clicked
-
OrthoSSep 27, 20090It took me exactly 10 minutes to figure out that I did not want to waste 90 minutes on this turd. Set aside the fact that the movie defies the laws of physics
-
-
Nov 26, 20112It was a rather basic sequel that does nothing to establish itself from the previous film and it was actually pretty disapointing. I expected far better.
-
Oct 14, 20120The worst movie I've ever seen in my whole life. There's no script, story or real action and the attempt to embed a false comedy makes this movie a shoddy work. Awful, disappointing, baffling, uneven. 0.
-
lsApr 20, 20093An hour and a half of my life I will never get back.
-
-
zackSApr 20, 20094I just got back from the movie maybe 30 minutes ago so here is my review... I never wanted to walk out on a movie before EVER! but this movie made me want to. Dont get me wrong there are funny parts but its like a funny part LONG DULL NOTHINGNESS and right before i want to leave another funny thing repeat... If someone offered me to see this movie for free i would still feel ripped off.
-
-
RobBMay 4, 20092
-
-
ChrisHSep 14, 20092This is quite possibly the perfect example of self-indulgence utterly ruining what should have been a solid sequel. I did not expect a realistic story, but this was simply absurdity without merit.
-
-
JMountainSep 9, 20092
-
-
DanielTFeb 2, 20100Ugh... maybe my way of thinking or preferences to movies made me hate this film. The number one reason (though there are A LOT of reasons) I hate this film is the way it is filmed. The shaky, every-changing camera doesn't focus on just one thing, and forces your mind to digest this crap.
-
-
MichaelLOct 14, 20093Awful movie! Not even close to as good as the first one. They really had no script and just stole stuff from the first one to make this one. Not a good idea.
-
-
WilliamMOct 18, 20092
-
-
BryanPApr 19, 20093Horrible movie, I love to watch Jason Statham but come on this movie is ridiculous. The first crank was awesome with a great ending, but Hollywood could not leave well enough alone, because the want money. The premise was the worst. On a good note their were some funny parts.
-
-
kgmApr 20, 20090Utter, utter garbage. This movie has no heart and that isn
-
-
RaySApr 26, 20093The producers have left behind all pretense of anything happening being grounded in reality. They lost me at the Godzilla style fight with big foam head caricatures of two characters in the movie. This movie is just a dumping ground for every stupid idea they could come up with. Considering people also look at traffic accidents, people will watch this movie too.
-
-
JimOMay 10, 20093
-
-
billoSep 22, 20090Anyone who gave this more than a zero is a mindless moron on crank.
-
-
ZackSSep 7, 20092The only movie i have every walked out of. I even asked for my money back. Didn't get it. If i can't get my money back can i get my hour back?
-
-
[Anonymous]Apr 27, 20090I really don't tend to be extreme but this is 100% the worst, most stupid movie I've ever seen and usually I can enjoy stupid movies. It's 0 out of 10 at the most, seriously.
-
-
averycSep 17, 20094
-
-
60Proof that you can make good movies based on video games, as long as you don't bother making a video game first. Juice us up for Crank 3D.
-
50Follows the same formula as the first, with one difference: They've managed to ramp up the action and vulgarity beyond the insane heights of the original.
-
10Benefits of the first film's ancillary gross-out will jolt "Voltage" like a speedball shot to the groin, until word of mouth spreads like an STD.