Metascore
30

Generally unfavorable reviews - based on 17 Critics

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 1 out of 17
  2. Negative: 8 out of 17
  1. Reviewed by: Steve Simels
    30
    If you accept the film on its own brain-damaged level, there actually are laughs to be had.
  2. At the end of 83 unmerciful minutes, audiences will be exclaiming, "Dude, I can't believe I sat through that movie!?" Stick to the trailer.
  3. An almost chuckle-free mess, so amateurish and lame that the cast often has that embarrassed look you see on dogs given ridiculous haircuts.
  4. Any civilization that can produce a movie this stupid probably deserves to be hit by famine and pestilence.
  5. Reviewed by: Cody Clark
    0
    None, repeat, none of this is funny.
  6. The definition of aiming low is when the John Hughes film you're ripping off is ''Weird Science."
  7. 0
    In the real audience with which I watched it, the only laughs were from kids under eight or nine, mostly at hilarious "hooter" jokes.
User Score
7.4

Generally favorable reviews- based on 180 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 81 out of 97
  2. Negative: 12 out of 97
  1. EmmaP.
    Sep 22, 2001
    10
    THIS MOVIE IS MY FAVORITE ONE! I never had so much fun in my life watching movies and I hate dumb comedies, so this movie is just Sweeeeeeeet dude!
  2. RahulD
    Apr 20, 2008
    0
    I don't see why people enjoy this. It was the worst comedy I have ever seen. If you want to watch a "stupid" but funny comedy, try I don't see why people enjoy this. It was the worst comedy I have ever seen. If you want to watch a "stupid" but funny comedy, try Zoolander or even Harold and Kumar. Full Review »
  3. MatthewR.
    May 19, 2010
    0
    I will never get those 84 minutes of my life back. Awful, really awful.