- Studio: Columbia Pictures
- Release Date: Apr 2, 2004
User Score
6.7
out of 10
Generally favorable reviews- based on 166 Ratings
User score distribution:
-
Positive: 123 out of 166
-
Mixed: 20 out of 166
-
Negative: 23 out of 166
Review this movie
-
-
Please sign in or create an account before writing a review.
-
-
Submit
-
Check Spelling
- User score
- Most active
- By date
- Most helpful
- Most Clicked
-
EddieK.Apr 3, 20042I'm probably not the best critic out there, but from my honest opinion, this is the worst movie of the year. Action was mediocre at best and cinematics was okay. Nothing great, nothing special. Hope you don't waste your money and time like I did.
-
-
TargillF.Apr 4, 20044Despite the high marks, Hellboy is full of plotholes from the first frame to the last. The only performance that makes this film watchable is that of Ron Perlman, who quite possibly is the first genre actor who might deserve some acting accolades for playing tortured men under makeup.
-
-
StasZ.Apr 7, 20041I give it a 1 because this movie is still better than Daredevil. Nevertheless, everything in this movie makes it a painful waste of time. Silly jokes, bad directing, bad screenplay, horrible dialogues, you name it. A complete disaster in today's movie history.
-
-
RoyMay 2, 20041
-
-
GerronKOct 3, 20043This film, while has some redeeming factors (like its cool use of makeup) is a horrendous movie that is shockingly horrible. It suffers from any kind of logic and is so horrible, I can't believe I'm awarding it 3/10!
-
-
JustMeApr 20, 20041
-
-
SeanM.Apr 9, 20041
-
-
ZybardJul 30, 20044Boring. Selma Blair's character was like an annoying bug bite that, when combined w/ Hellboy's pathetic unconditional and unwarrented love for her, there was little time left for an actual plot.
-
-
JimP.Aug 30, 20050Utter pap! The acting was so wooden it was unbelievable!
-
-
JimT.Apr 24, 20044I don't know what the excitement was about. A cookie-cutter comic book adaptation with a supposedly humorous/emotional element spliced in. A big disappointment. The monsters and special effects would be impressive if we hadn't seen them 100 times already.
-
-
HellboySucksApr 27, 20041
-
-
PeteA.Apr 9, 20043
-
-
KelR.May 15, 20043What in the world was happening in this movie? It was just a jumbled mess of confusion. Plus the movie was well beyond unrealistic, not to mention just about satanic. Don't watch this garbage, not even at the dollar movie.
-
-
AndrewS.Aug 11, 20043This movie was dissapointing to say the least. The story was weak and the characters were uninteresting.
-
-
SimbaSep 25, 20040Shockingly bad.
-
-
fabioNov 29, 20044You can't make a Hollywood movie without a love story (it's a way to bring girls in theaters?) - a (dark) horror/paranormal comic book turned into a (bright) fantastic movie...that's not good.
-
-
May 28, 20120I tagged along with two friends who wanted to see this. I apologized for laughing. Then they too started laughing. Then we walked out. The ticket guy asked how the movie was and i farted.
-
50Standard-issue superhero movie -- except that writer-director Guillermo del Toro, taking his cue from "Hellboy" comic book creator Mike Mignola, brings a wicked sense of humor to this particular monster mash.
-
70Has more than enough across-the-board appeal to attract mainstream auds unfamiliar with source material.
-
75Directed by Guillermo del Toro with a colorfully kinetic visual imagination that seldom lets up.