Metascore
40 out of 100

Mixed or average reviews - based on 19 Critics

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 5 out of 19
  2. Negative: 6 out of 19
  1. 38
    You can't blame John Cusack for jumping at the chance to play Igor.
  2. 30
    Pixar this isn't, but neither is it "Mary Shelley's Veggie Tales." If only.
  3. Reviewed by: Robert Abele
    30
    One of those fever-pitched computer-generated whizbangs in which every character spits out lines like a caffeinated Catskills comic.
  4. Reviewed by: Justin Chang
    30
    With its belabored gags, misfired pop-culture references and garish visuals crammed together like so many disjointed body parts, this manic kidpic cranks up the annoy-o-meter early on and rarely lets up.
  5. One of those non-stop jabbering cartoons in which most of the lines sound like the spontaneous riffs from a couple of comics sitting around a diner.
  6. Reviewed by: Robert Wilonsky
    0
    So bad it's scary.
User Score

Generally favorable reviews- based on 34 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 15 out of 20
  2. Negative: 4 out of 20
  1. I want to like it so much, but it wasn't funny and its computer animation let me down and it had a hit and miss premise that let me down and the voice performances were boring. I give this movie 27%. Full Review »
  2. giren
    5
    Worth to watch. But not smart enough to be an animated movie on this era.
  3. 6
    Muy original poder hacer una historia con el eterno secundario del Dr. Frankenstein. QuiĆ©n no ha visto siempre a Igor como un personaje diverttido, que nos recuerda al Jorobado de Notre Damme. Muy divertidos los personajes secundarios, el gato immortal y sobretodo el cerebro. Full Review »