1. IzaakV

   10

   I love this movie. The mere fact that they brought it out just for more 'jurassic park action' is good enough for me.

   • Helpful? 1 of 2 users said Yes.
2. MovieLonely94

   8

   it wasn't as good as the first movie, but it beats the second movie in just one shot and its an entertaining sequel in the series after the visuals were the great saving grace.
   
   rating: 8/10… Expand

   • Helpful? 0 of 0 users said Yes.
3. TheQuietGamer

   7

   While it's not as good as the first movie it's still a blast to watch and brings back memories of the first one, I was really happy that they brought back Dr. Grant, if you like the first movie you may be a little disappointed with this one, but it's still an enjoyable movie.… Collapse

   • Helpful? 0 of 0 users said Yes.
4. Halfwelshman

   4

   The Lost World wasn't a terrible sequel, and neither is Jurassic Park III. It inherits the drawbacks of the series thus far - criminal under-development of characters and a script that leaves a lot to be desired. The effects are still fantastic of course,and there's enough action here to keep event the most ardent dinophiles entertained. My main problem with Jurassic Park III is that without Spielberg in the director's chair, the film lags behind it's predecessors in terms of quality. Clearly all the film's budget went on the admittedly fantastic looking Spinosaurus, but unfortunately this means a lot of the rest of the film looks a little cheap. There's no hiding where the money ran out, as there is a multitude of scenes in confined spaces, most which appear to be ill-disguised studio sets. Essentially, Joe Johnston has ripped away the Jurassic Park series' blockbuster crown and replaced it with the rather less regal B-Movie paper hat, which is rather tragic.… Expand

   • Helpful? 0 of 0 users said Yes.

See all 70 User Reviews