Advanced Search Beta »
Basic Search Fields
Kiss the Girls
User Score
7.4 out of 10

Generally favorable reviews- based on 7 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 5 out of 7
  2. Mixed: 2 out of 7
  3. Negative: 0 out of 7

Review this movie

  1. Your Score
    10 out of 10
    Rate this:
    out of 10
  1. Submit
  2. Check Spelling

  3. Characters remaining: 5000 out of 5000

view
per page
  1. FrankO.
    Feb 15, 2006
    7
    Morgan Freeman shines as Alex Cross in this adaptation of a James Patterson's thriller novel. Ashley Judd is good as 2nd character..movie was too long but plotline kept it going.
    • 0 of 1 users said yes
  2. AndrewM.
    Nov 29, 2004
    5
    Kiss The Girls is not a good film, nor is it a bad film. It is something of a Libran film, symbolised by scales. On one side of the scales we have the good aspects of the film, on the other the bad. And, like all true scales when used correctly, both sides balance perfectly. Taking a closer look at the scales, we notice that representing the ?things done well? side is Mr Morgan Freeman, for yet another typically solid performance. Along side him the beautiful Miss Ashley Judd, for the professionalism and quality she brings to every role, not just this one. Keeping them company we have a talented cinematographist, incisive screenwriter (who's relatively wasted here) and of course, a superb novelist. On the other side of the scales representing ?things done not-so-well?, keeping the union in harmony, is an inconsistent director, sloppy editor and ignorant producer(s) who have not the faintest inkling for the atmosphere and structure of the novel. In my belief, errors that plagued the adaptation of Along Came A Spider have unfortunately tainted this one too. Hopefully James Patterson will have the desire and means to avoid a third disappointment....… Expand
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  3. kill9015
    Mar 9, 2012
    8
    this film may be a bit old but it was still good, the actors were brilliant but that is expected by Morgan Freemon. the plot is clever but you can tell what is coming in the film (well if you have a brain) and this does sort of wreck the film this is why more score is not higher. i thought it was a developed film with good actors and good plot
prev next
Page:
  • 1

Critic Reviews

All reviews »
Metascore
46 out of 100

Mixed or average reviews - based on 17 Critics

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 4 out of 17
  2. Mixed: 10 out of 17
  3. Negative: 3 out of 17
  1. Washington Post
    Reviewed by: Rita Kempley
    70
    A solid second film from director Gary Fleder ("Things to Do in Denver When You're Dead"), it's sure to set pulses racing and spines tingling. Too bad it's at the expense of the dignity of young women everywhere.
    Read full review
  2. Austin Chronicle
    Reviewed by: Russell Smith
    40
    It's diverting enough, and intermittently suspenseful, but also strangely empty and decadent in a way that truly merits that overused term.
    Read full review
  3. Chicago Sun-Times
    Reviewed by: Roger Ebert
    88
    David Klass, the screenwriter, gives Freeman and Judd more specific dialogue than is usual in thrillers; they sound as if they might actually be talking with each other and not simply advancing plot points.
    Read full review
See all critic reviews »