- Studio: Paramount Pictures
- Release Date: Dec 17, 2004
User Score
6.6
out of 10
Generally favorable reviews- based on 141 Ratings
User score distribution:
-
Positive: 99 out of 141
-
Mixed: 13 out of 141
-
Negative: 29 out of 141
Review this movie
-
Your Score10 out of 10
-
Please sign in or create an account before writing a review.
-
-
Submit
-
Check Spelling
-
Characters remaining: 5000 out of 5000
- User score
- Most active
- By date
- Most helpful
- Most Clicked
-
Oct 23, 20116"A Series of Unfortunate Events" is a decent kid-block buster with a average story line with a monotonous tone. But as always, its Jim Carrey (the veteran actor) the saves the screen.
-
AlisonHJul 5, 20056The movie wasn't bad - but the books are much better! I hope the next book in the series (due in the fall) makes it onto the book reviews portion of metacritic.
-
-
DanK.May 3, 200510Very good indeed!!!
-
-
MikeT.May 7, 200510
-
-
JoshWMay 7, 20053Great performances from the actors, great sets, beutiful cinematography and a story line that was beyond ridiculous. Not that there is anything wrong with a ridiculous script, just as long as it isn't boring too.
-
-
GaborA.May 11, 20053Another episode of Jim Carrey single handedly ruining a movie. Unfortunatly, even withou him this would have been a mediocre effort at best.
-
-
AmandaJ.May 14, 200510I love this movie it is the best movie ever i love it i always laugh my head off.
-
-
T&LS&BMay 15, 20052This movie SUCKS! Count Olof is supose to be scary not Stupid And Funny! s
-
-
EugeneW.May 17, 20050When I sat thought this movie I wished I had followed the instructions given at the very beginning by Jude Law the narrator. Its very good advice and well taken. That is you should stop viewing it immediately and go do something else. I also must say that children may actually enjoy it but as an adult I found it dull and lacking.
-
-
MaxP.May 21, 20057Jim Carrey delivers a stunning performance amid a mediocre (i.e. terribly predictable) plot. Many of the subplots seem severely underdeveloped, but all-in-all: worth the cash.
-
-
LisaS.May 22, 20057The Movie seemed old fashon but had a good plot .You never knew what would happen next!
-
-
CarinaV.May 27, 200510I think this movie was awesome!! I'm so glad Jim Carry played Count Olaf! Jim Carry made the movie outstanding! Even if they used someone else it still would have ben great! I was flabbergasteed @ the end because I finally say the movie! I am a big fan of the book the 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th, 5th, 6th, 7th, 8th, 9th, 10th, and the11th book! I can,t wait untill the 12th and 13th come out!!!!
-
-
TimidFerretMay 29, 20052How dull, it's like watching paint dry, plenty of money has been thrown at it but to little effect, I was expecting excitment put only found boring monologues, if you suffer from insomnia then this is the movie for you.
-
-
CodyK.Jun 11, 20057I’ve never read the books…. and never plan to. That said, I enjoyed the movie. Jim Carrey delivers a ridiculously clever performance that balances out the stark and gloomy setting perfectly. One of the most unique and quirky children’s movies I’ve had the pleasure of seeing.
-
-
PatC.Jun 14, 20053It's not just Carrey - nearly the entire cast overacts their parts. Sunny is the only interesting character in this clumsy pretentious effort.
-
-
AdamKJun 24, 20050
-
-
MeganM.Aug 5, 20059In my opinion, you can't judge this movie just by reading the books. I feel they did a very good job sticking to the general storyline of the first three books in the series. Darkly humorous and exciting to the end, audiences may enjoy this movie more than critics.
-
-
JessicaKAug 17, 20059It was relley good but i liked reading it more, its beacause it was longer.i cant wait until the second movie comes out. i cant wait 4 the 12th book either!its gonna be so good (i hope).
-
-
StephanieRAug 27, 200510This is my favourite movie! The books are good and so is the movie! The only problem is that Jim Carrey made Olaf likeable! But Emily Browning and Liam Aiken were amazing! Kara and Shelby Hoffman were so cute as Sunny! A must see!
-
-
toms.Sep 26, 20050At no point in this movie did i think it was good.
-
-
MaddieS.Sep 27, 200510I agree totally with Stephanie R. This film is one of the best I've ever seen! Added to the fact that Liam Aiken was in it and he is one of the most gorgeous boys on the planet, second only to Dan Radcliffe. I know a lot of the words and it's great fun saying them along with the characters.
-
-
V.F.D.MemberOct 31, 20058
-
-
GeraldineJ.Oct 31, 20050Ring This movie was great, and it couldn't have been better. Movie one is this great, and I can't wait for the really great next movie. None of the parts in this movie sucks.
-
-
bookreaderDNov 7, 20058The books are the best i am on the 11 and it is great i am about to finish it and i hope if there is a nother move it should be in line and klaus should have glasses.
-
-
JasonK.Nov 14, 20058The movie Series of Unfortunate Events I thought was pretty cool. It had all the charactors, but the one thing I did not like about the movie was that Klaus did not wear glasses.
-
-
JohnR.Dec 4, 20055Jim Carey, like Robin Williams, is best when constrained by the director. Brad Silberling gives him his head and what could have been a super movie turns second-rate. A send-up of a caricature of a grotesque. Your initials may be JC but this film is not all about you.
-
-
KakalinaL.Mar 20, 20069I I only like this movie because of all the little funny things in it. It really cracks me up sometimes!
-
-
FábioN.Jul 4, 200610This beauty production it's definily good,isn't a amazing adaptation but still diserve our atention.
-
-
DanielleP.Jul 14, 200610Iit was realy good you should make a nother movie. I know a lot over people that want you to make a 2nd movie.
-
-
SeanP.Aug 20, 20063It was dull and lacking exictment and out of order to the books.
-
-
DanielH.Oct 15, 20061It was the single worst book turned into a film I have ever seen. It put me off reading the books for a week!
-
-
GenesisM.Dec 28, 200610The movie was great. The characters were brave and they understand their situation. They know how to fight.
-
-
AndrewM.Apr 12, 20079Having not read the books I entered the movie without knowing what it was about. I was immediatly blown away by the production and the wit of the writer. I enjoy Jim Carry and think of him as a genious when it comes to bringing life to characters. Loved the story, loved the characters and really enjoyed the beautiful art production. Have got it out again and again.
-
-
EdS.Dec 22, 20049Great casting, acting, storyline (without reading the books beforehand), and the greatest of all is the art direction/cinematography. What an eye candy! This one's a keeper, as compared to the boring Potter movies.
-
-
BarryR.Dec 26, 20047
-
-
anonymuosjuniorDec 20, 20042Nothing like the BOOK.
-
-
[Anonymous]Dec 18, 20049Absolutely Hilarious.
-
-
HPGIRLhugeLemonysnicketfanDec 18, 20044Although it had a witty plot I feel it was a huge disapointment to people WHO REALLY READ THE BOOKS and an insult to lemony snicket himself. I found everything went wrong and I feel the same about HARRY POTTER#3 with all due respect HPGIRL.
-
-
BillyE.Dec 17, 200410What a rush!!! I'd take this over Harry Potter anyday. Fast paced and visually enchanting. Sunny is a riot and Jim Carrey is prefect for the multi-character Count Olaf. DON"T MISS THIS ONE!!!!!!!
-
-
JenniferS.Dec 27, 20049I knew that I would like the movie as soon as I saw the poster. The only thing that would have made it even better is if Tim Burton was the Director.
-
-
AlexaB.Dec 27, 200410Its great fabulous actors, and the plot was good!
-
-
DanaM.Dec 22, 20046A bit disjointed. Done in the manner of Harry Potter movies with overdone visuals. Entertaining certainly but hard to figure out the mystery, even after the ending. A lot of questions left unanswered, but of course that is what sequels are for, and this movie defintely steers you towards a sequel.
-
-
DaliaF.Dec 23, 20049This film was surprisingly good. it is the first PG i have seen that has actually been good. Altough slightly predictalbe, it is funny, good story line (although slightly erratic), great acting and the scenery is great.
-
-
RobertADec 22, 20048Yes, i definetly enjoyed this more then the first to Harry Potter movies. this shorter style of movie making is a better way to do it. 3 books in 1. i unfortunetly liked it.
-
-
SamanthaS.Dec 26, 20049Has everyone forgotten that movies are often just supposed to entertain the audience? I only read the first book in the series. I am 42 and frankly I found this movie quite entertaining, in a good-creepy way.
-
-
DaveDec 20, 20047Meryl Streep's performance is alone worth the price of admission
-
-
MartinL.Dec 29, 20049AWESOME movie!
-
-
BiancaDec 27, 200410How can you say that it is a 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8, or a 9. It is going to go far like Harry Potter!
-
-
AaronL.Dec 20, 20045Although it was somewhat enjoyable to see parts of the Lemony books come to life, it was a huge error to combine three books into one movie. The film is jumbled, out of order from the books, includes many scenes not in the books, and never takes the opportunity to explore all the characters. For fans of the books, this adaptation is a great disappointment.
-
-
JackandLynnDec 24, 20042This movie, while not absolutely horrible, was not worth the admission price at the theatre. It was geared towards children, and as adults, we found ourselves bored and wondering when it would be over!
-
-
MartinG.Dec 28, 20048Having read a couple of the books, it seemed to have caught the atmosphere. The sets are stylish, and the performance of the Hoffman twins excellent. If you don't know the books, it will leave you a bit confused, but entertaining nevertheless. Producers seem to have left their options open to a second film, but unlike the books, there was an implied satisfactory end.
-
-
WillH.Dec 23, 20042Absoloutley abissmal!!!!!!! Dont go and see it because you would rather pour acid in your eyes!!!!
-
-
MichaelD.Dec 23, 20048
-
-
GeorgeT.Dec 15, 20049It's very good and interesting. If you like solving mysteries you'll love this. Although it could have been a bit better by giving Klaus glasses and Count Olaf could have been more evil.
-
-
BarneyTheDinosaurDec 17, 20047This movie is superb.
-
-
G.M.D.K.Dec 19, 20047Funny, enjoyable, gloomy. But lacks spirit of the book by making 3 books to 1 movie of 107 minutes. I'd take Harry Potter rather than this.
-
-
ChadS.Dec 20, 20047
-
-
michaelrDec 30, 20049I loved the kids and Carey. The visuals were very striking and inventive. Alittle disjointed, since it was a compilation of three stories, but overall very well done.
-
-
KenH.Dec 30, 20049Being a jaded 40+ father dragging their kids to another bad holiday movie, I was surprised how much I loved this movie. A visual spectacle and an entertaining story. Better than any of the Harry Potter movies for sure.
-
-
LucilleJ.Dec 31, 200410A great film in every department!
-
-
KyleAJan 1, 20057Surprisingly not bad--it's very entertaining. Even if you are not thrilled by the storyline, the visuals are sure to astound.
-
-
calbJan 4, 200510This is the best its so different to any other film i've seen thats why its so good.
-
-
StefanS.Jan 6, 20057I am a German, saw the film in original version in a sneak preview. I did not understand every word but the acting of Mr Carrey made it a nice adventure and only for that its enough to watch that movie.
-
-
palinaC.Jan 7, 200510I really enjoyed the movie. I am giving this movie a 10 because i love the books. I'm also a BIG FAN!
-
-
MattF.Jan 8, 20058
-
-
shawnsJan 9, 20059I am still VERY Srprised how awesome this film was ....Largely in part to this AMAZING trio of young actors I highly recommend this film ( take it from me I HATE JIM CAREY but this was a great film.
-
-
DamianP.Jan 12, 20053It looked good, the acting was excellent, but the story was dull and flawed. Maybe it deserves a higher score on its merits as a childrens movie, but I'm not a child.
-
-
JackN.Jan 13, 200510I luved it, especially jm cary was funny.
-
-
[Anonymous]Jan 14, 20053
-
-
DanielleJan 15, 20051I can't believe how horrible the movie was. Anyone who is a fan of the book series should not go see this movie. Jim Carey was the worst possible actor they could have gotten to play count Olaf becuase Olaf is supposed to be scarey not funny. I am completely dissapointed and it's a shame that this movie ever came out. Sorry.
-
-
AndreaC.Jan 15, 20053This movie gets a three rating only.
-
-
AubreyJan 16, 20055I read the books before i watched this movie and I was disatified with where the events where placed in the movie i mean they took half of the 1st book and put it at the end...honestly you should have at least put the events in the right order...other than that the movie was pretty good!
-
-
MaxC.Jan 18, 200510A Wonderful movie! I enjoyed this movie very much. Even the end credits were absolutely wonderful!
-
-
EmilyJan 28, 20058I think it was a really good movie because it was funny but also when you think about it, it is really sinister and creepy. I liked the cleverness of the children and how surreal it was- making it more like a nightmare. I havn't read the books so I wouldn't know how accurate it is but I would say it's well worth watching!
-
-
napoleondynamitefanJan 28, 20054I think that they books are so0o0o00o0 much better than the movies because, the movie was only 3 boks in one movie.
-
-
farhanaza.Feb 1, 20050I hate this movie. i hate it. It's soooooo gross and it is very hard to understand the things that are said yet.
-
-
PaulW.Feb 6, 20050I found that this movie was so boring that I actually fell asleep in the theater, my girlfriend had to nudge me to wake me up when it was over.
-
-
KevinY.Feb 7, 20052I have only walked out of one movie in my life, Caddyshack 2. Jim Carrey gives a very Jackie Mason like performance. A beautiful movie to look at so members of NORML might enjoy but I want 107 minutes of my life back.
-
-
jaunitoFeb 19, 20055
-
-
lizkMar 14, 20055It was a nice moive because i read all the books so i understood it, but when i asked my dad if he liked it he said it had to many holes and it made him feel like he would not like the books! please do not see it if you have not read the books and if you have prepare to be dissapointed!!!
-
-
MatthewB.Mar 29, 20059I think this movie was spectaculor. The three children were perfect for the role. My only problem with the movie is that jim carrey played count olaf which is supposed to be an evil part not a funny part but he was ok it would of been nice if he were more eviler though!
-
-
DavidH.Apr 5, 20050So bad, it's unfortunate.
-
-
AngeloG.Apr 5, 20057This is a good but stupid movie. It has Klaus without wearing glasses and the glasses are a BIG part in book 4 that will be in part 2 and violet is younger then Klaus in real life. and Emily Browning (violet) isn't even hott!!! In conclusion, the characters suck!!!
-
-
LauraDApr 16, 200510Very funny movie Great interpretation of Jim Carrey. Baby Sunny is the funniest character. The soundtrack is spectacular!! The plot is not so banal as it may seem. But it may not be the kind of movie you would expect after the trailer and by Jim Carrey and Meryl Streep.
-
-
KlausF.Apr 23, 20059I loved it! It was smashing! The only thing was Count Olaf was supposed to be Evil, and Klaus didn't have glasses. If they make a continued movie, how are they going to make it without Klaus's glasses?
-
-
JohnG.Apr 27, 20052
-
-
Oct 17, 20106It was a little better than Ok but it isn't the first kids film I think of when I'm feeling nostaligic. The children are quite weak and I'd prefer to read the books. The whole thing did the job but it wasn't anything to rant and rave about.
-
Oct 18, 20109its not the exact kind of Harry Potter you're looking for, but this movie relies on Jim Carrey's hilarious peformance as the villian and it will please moviegoers of all ages.
-
Oct 23, 201010
-
May 7, 20118A great series of books turned into a pretty good movie. I imagine that it would be difficult for such amazing books to be turned into a good movie, as it always is, but this movie was very well done.
-
Jul 7, 201110
-
Aug 27, 20116
-
Nov 20, 20114Cramming 3 books into 1 short film isnt a good idea, Especially when Lemony Snicket books are filled with countless details that the film left out. The cast was good and Jim Carrey is at his best in this film. I was a huge fan of the books and I was excited for this film but it was just a major disapointment.
-
Jan 1, 20125It was decent but the huge flaw of this film is that they tried to cram 3 books into one short film and they left out so much because of it as well. Jim Carrey was amazing in it and he was perfect for the part imo and he definently made it worth watching for him alone. It was ok but not as good asit could have been.
prev
next
Page:
- 1
-
100Exceptionally clever, hilariously gloomy and bitingly subversive.
-
60Devolves into a repetitive comedy that squanders a hugely talented cast.
-
80Pretty charming. Audiences may like it more than critics, but everyone should agree it's one of the most wickedly stylish movies of the year.