Metascore
42

Mixed or average reviews - based on 19 Critics What's this?

User Score
5.0

Mixed or average reviews- based on 27 Ratings

Your Score
0 out of 10
Rate this:
  • 10
  • 9
  • 8
  • 7
  • 6
  • 5
  • 4
  • 3
  • 2
  • 1
  • 0
  • 0
Watch On
Score distribution:
  1. Positive: 4 out of 19
  2. Negative: 3 out of 19
  1. A wild ride through nonstop visual effects yet a warm wallow in the cinema of the dumbed-down.
  2. Reviewed by: Ellen Vanstone
    63
    This good movie could have been great if writer Akiva Goldsman had been able to -- or been permitted to -- dump the boundaries of the TV source altogether.
  3. Reviewed by: Darren Bignell
    60
    Though there's an obvious, admirable effort to supply character development and plot twists, the set-work and special effects - both stylish and stunning - tend to dominate.
  4. The picture is a relentless blast of color and movement that's based on the old TV show, but boils down to a supercharged version of old-time Saturday-afternoon movie serials.
  5. Reviewed by: Dennis Harvey
    50
    A pic that provides one hour's decent, eye-filling ride, then crashes and burns amid some of the worst writing since ... well, since scenarist/co-producer Akiva Goldsman's last effort, "Batman & Robin."
  6. Reviewed by: Tom Meek
    50
    About the only thing that is lucid, in the malestrom of wham-bam effects, is the set-up for a sequel.
  7. Reviewed by: John Krewson
    10
    Dream up a plot incorporating time travel, genetic mutation, cyberjargon, and saving the Earth -- all the worst and most boring elements of science fiction. Finally, type up a list of bad jokes, space-talk, and semi-tough tag lines; label it "script."

See all 19 Critic Reviews

Score distribution:
  1. Positive: 3 out of 6
  2. Negative: 2 out of 6
  1. Dec 30, 2013
    9
    A very good Si-Fi movie !
    Good for the all family, good story, just a little long.
    It's not the best film ever made but would deserve to be
    A very good Si-Fi movie !
    Good for the all family, good story, just a little long.
    It's not the best film ever made but would deserve to be more known
    Expand
  2. Mar 20, 2012
    6
    I saw this when I was 14 or 15 so my review definitely doesn't have a lot of credibility. I liked the movie enough to watch it a few times,I saw this when I was 14 or 15 so my review definitely doesn't have a lot of credibility. I liked the movie enough to watch it a few times, but I do remember most of it being cheesy and predictable. Although to give it more credit, the original was extremely cheesy, what would you expect from a 50s show? I felt the story needed to be more centered around one issue, but it felt random. But perhaps it was doomed from the start. The main premise is that they are lost in space and they have lots of adventures. So, perhaps this should have been a show and not a movie. This film is decent, that is the best way to describe it. Gary Oldman is wonderful as usual, great character. Collapse
  3. Mar 14, 2013
    6
    I'll be honest when I say I actually liked this movie. I know it gets allot of bad reviews from allot of people, and I understand and agreeI'll be honest when I say I actually liked this movie. I know it gets allot of bad reviews from allot of people, and I understand and agree their opinions. But, I enjoyed at and found it entertaining. As long as you don't take it too seriously and enjoy it for what it is then it can be fun. Overall: It's a crap movie, but I still enjoyed regardless of all its flaws. Expand
  4. Jan 11, 2012
    3
    It's hard to know where to start with this mess of a movie when almost everything is so horribly wrong. The writing is absolutely appallingIt's hard to know where to start with this mess of a movie when almost everything is so horribly wrong. The writing is absolutely appalling ("Within these eggsacks lives a monster race of spiders!"), the direction is non-existent, the plot flails around at random, and the effects are incredibly dated. However, most of all, what truly makes Lost in Space a wretched experience, is the cast. Oftentimes the robot (simply named 'Robot') has more emotional depth than the human characters. William Hurt and Matt LeBlanc put on embarrassingly awful performances, and being the two male leads, this is unforgivable. Lines are just lackadaisically read in standard middle-shots no matter the scenario. Gary Oldman brings his usual A-grade ham, and Jared Harris uses a bizarre cartoon-character like speech pattern for his role. The film is not offensively bad, but most certainly is not worth the two-hours of its running time. Expand
  5. Mar 22, 2015
    2
    1. youngest daughter set to squeal.
    2. ham rape.
    3. monotone performance from William Hurt. 4.underdone monkey pet set to squeal. 5.
    1. youngest daughter set to squeal.
    2. ham rape.
    3. monotone performance from William Hurt.
    4.underdone monkey pet set to squeal.
    5. continuity issues of internal story logic.
    6. Mr. Robinson's goodbye to his wife "goodbye wife" before possible death clearly overdubbed post production.

    7. constant dead eyes from cast apparently director had no cattle prod.
    8. "robot forget logic use your heart" Will to robot, a child prodigy of time travel is so temporary stupid he doesn't know software is built on logic.
    Expand

See all 6 User Reviews

Trailers

Related Articles

  1. The Best and Worst Time Travel Movies

    The Best and Worst Time Travel Movies Image
    Published: March 23, 2010
    We've traveled through the history of cinema to uncover the best and worst time travel movies -- as well as everything in between. Where do your favorites stand?