- Studio: Universal Pictures
- Release Date: Sep 18, 2009
User Score
5.5
out of 10
Mixed or average reviews- based on 22 Ratings
User score distribution:
-
Positive: 11 out of 22
-
Mixed: 4 out of 22
-
Negative: 7 out of 22
Review this movie
-
-
Please sign in or create an account before writing a review.
-
-
Submit
-
Check Spelling
- User score
- Most active
- By date
- Most helpful
- Most Clicked
-
AngelicaCSep 21, 20098
-
-
JessEOct 14, 20098I liked the movie. I don't know what everyone else is butt hurt and complaining about.
-
-
ChadS.Sep 20, 20097
-
-
SethB.Sep 20, 20091Syrupy and stupid and boring. Not the actors fault either. At the end of the movie when one character starts that slow clap and others join in right at the climax of the movie I just wanted to kill the producer. Such recycled garbage.
-
-
AdaMOct 17, 20094
-
-
aprilhOct 6, 200910Sorry folks.. But I about 30 other people in the showing all Loved the movie.. which included about 10 men. Everyone of us walked out saying we loved the movie.. Lucky I don't think much of 'Critics' reviews.. If I did, I wouldn't see 3/4 of the movies I do go watch..
-
-
KevinSSep 18, 20090Movie should be renamed to "Nothing Happens". What a bore!
-
-
CarolynL.Sep 18, 20091the whole self-help guru thing is not even believable . The movie is dumb and the actors are less than good or engaging . Eckart does the same thing as he did in Thanks For Not Smoking and Aniston does the same mannerisms in every movie .
-
-
ElaineCSep 19, 20098Definitely the ubiquitous "chick flick," it's still very enjoyable if the viewer sees it with absolutely no expectations of pathos and drama. It lives up to its promise--the co-stars are very easy on the eyes and deliver a sweet little love story.
-
-
Apr 17, 20113A tropical bird released into the Pacific Northwest would end up just as dead as this turkey. It started off looking like a thought-provoking and promising film. Then the writer either got bored or lazy or both, and it all turned to slapstick and kitsch.
-
Feb 17, 20113My mate and i gave up half way, the lead actor wasn't meant for the role and he didn't seem to have any form of chemistry with jennifer anniston.Anyways, i wasted 20 minutes watching the movie and wouldnt want to waste anymore minutes writing anymore word in my review.
-
63Although the film begins promisingly, it proves to be little more than a soap opera.
-
50Eckhart has even less chemistry with Aniston than he did with fellow narcissist Catherine Zeta-Jones in 2007’s "No Reservations," going soft and gooey only when he and Martin Sheen, as Burke’s father-in-law, share a big cry.
-
50An incredibly lazy movie -- but not an unbearable one, thanks to Aaron Eckhart's charm.