Metascore
58

Mixed or average reviews - based on 34 Critics

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 16 out of 34
  2. Negative: 1 out of 34
  1. Less a biography than an essay on theatrical illusion and the changing nature of comedy. Love it or hate it, you've never seen anything quite like it.
  2. 100
    Less a conventional biography than a performance film - one that stuns and delights.
  3. 100
    Actually moves, whisking the audience on a funny, sad and extraordinary journey through a singularly compelling moment in American pop culture.
  4. Jim Carrey's performance is an impersonation on the level of genius.
  5. 88
    What is most wonderful about Man on the Moon, a very good film, is that it remains true to Kaufman's stubborn vision.
  6. Reviewed by: Sarah Raskin
    80
    This Andy has "Oscar" written all over it.
  7. Reviewed by: Richard Schickel
    80
    Just gives us Andy, the pop postmodernist, and permits us to make what we will of him, which is a fascinating activity.
  8. 75
    Carrey's amazing transformation in Man on the Moon does justice to Kaufman's undefinable talents and his peculiar outlook on entertainment.
  9. Carrey gives an otherworldly, possessed performance as Kaufman.
  10. A fascinating, sometimes profound curiosity.
  11. Reviewed by: Mike Clark
    75
    A movie of moments whose ultimate legacy may be to get Carrey out of formula comedies forever.
  12. It offers no special insights into its subject, it doesn't connect on any higher level, and it left me feeling vaguely dissatisfied and let down.
  13. 67
    Strictly texture, a romp over the surfaces of Andy Kaufman's life with not much insight into its core.
  14. 63
    Unsuccessfully attempts to fathom Kaufman's lunatic sensibilities, supplying scant psychological insight into what made the outrageous comic tick.
  15. It's not that the movie is bad; it's merely uninspired and relatively clueless about Kaufman.
  16. Reviewed by: Jay Carr
    63
    Remains a frustratingly opaque study. There's something missing, namely Kaufman.
  17. Reviewed by: Chuck Stephens
    60
    The sort of sick humor even Andy Kaufman would have recognized as well beyond the pale.
  18. 60
    You won't forget the way Carrey transcends mere impersonation to find the roots of Andy's torment.
  19. Reviewed by: Tom Keogh
    60
    Jim Carrey is magnificent as Kaufman.
  20. Reviewed by: Janet Maslin
    60
    What is missing here, though it might have been the first thing expected from an ostensible film biography, is an answer to the simplest question: Who was Andy Kaufman, and how did he get that way?
  21. Reviewed by: David Ansen
    60
    Forman's decision to stick to the surface is probably, in the end, a wise one. Kaufman always wanted to keep us guessing, and this movie respects his wishes.
  22. 60
    Though it suggests intriguing ideas about the nature of performance, humor, ambition, and the consumption of spectacle, the movie only superficially explores them.
  23. Though Man on the Moon is lost when it comes to Kaufman's inner life and motivations, it offers a detailed account of his career.
  24. 50
    Milos Forman's film is a series of incredible simulations that never quite cohere into a movie.
  25. If this movie is a pedestal, it is far too tall and wide for a performer of Kaufman's stature.
  26. Reviewed by: John Hartl
    50
    Carrey's performance, and Forman's lively attempts to ask serious questions about the nature of comedy, keep it interesting. Certainly it's never dull.
  27. Unfortunately for Man on the Moon, Kaufman is definitely a person more interesting to hear about than to experience, an acquired taste few will be tempted to acquire.
  28. All credit to Carrey, whose one-man performance is almost enough to redeem the movie.
  29. It would seem the purpose of this movie, if not to deify, is to define -- and in this it fails miserably.
  30. 40
    Too conventional to capture Kaufman's insanity and too haphazard, too shapeless, to recapture Kaufman's energy in any meaningful way.
User Score
7.4

Generally favorable reviews- based on 48 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 16 out of 17
  2. Negative: 0 out of 17
  1. Jan 26, 2015
    8
    I enter the film while being literally oblivious of who is Andy Kaufman, as far as I know, the film is mostly famed because it hitherto hasI enter the film while being literally oblivious of who is Andy Kaufman, as far as I know, the film is mostly famed because it hitherto has been Jim Carrey’s most Oscar-worthy performance, yet being blatantly snubbed again after his drama venture in Peter Weir’s THE TRUMAN SHOW (1998, 8/10).

    So in my case, the film is a dedicative portrait of an eccentric entertainer whose ideology of performance is all about entertaining himself and treat his audience as a receptacle of his sensational idiosyncrasy and excruciatingly manipulative fabrications disguised as parody or mockery. Yet, during his short life-span (Andy passed away in 1984 at the age of 35), this methodology makes him a unique figure in the canvas of American comedians (although he would never condescend himself as a “comedian”).

    keep reading my review on my blog, google: cinema omnivore, thanks
    Full Review »
  2. May 27, 2014
    7
    While as a whole, Miloš Forman created an almost mawkish depiction of the enigmatic Andy Kaufman, with all the cliché's of a biographicalWhile as a whole, Miloš Forman created an almost mawkish depiction of the enigmatic Andy Kaufman, with all the cliché's of a biographical film. Jim Carreys almost uncannily identical portrayal of Kaufman, is not even an adaptation of the person, but a translation, something that' s seldom seen from palatable or even capable biographicals. It is his magnum opus, and the Academy Awards I think failed to recognize his comedic talent. Though the Golden Globes didn't, as they are more fair. Full Review »
  3. Dec 16, 2013
    6
    Ok movie right here. Jim Carrey kills it, however, the rest of movie feels as though it's missing something, like something feels a little offOk movie right here. Jim Carrey kills it, however, the rest of movie feels as though it's missing something, like something feels a little off (which I guess is appropriate). Full Review »